wtf is this
Robbed
Submitted 3 hours ago by restingOface@quokk.au to [deleted]
https://quokk.au/static/media/posts/y4/pI/y4pImHq9aG7oPIP.jpg
Comments
texture@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
The Wuthering Heights director Emerald Fennell said it was “unfortunate” that a scene showing Margot Robbie’s hairy armpits did not make the final cut, because women in period adaptations are often shown with clean-shaven underarms.
Robbie’s character, Cathy, had “extremely hairy armpits” in the 2026 adaptation of the novel, but “unfortunately the scene that we see them didn’t make it in there”, said the director.
Cathy having unshaven pits “was so important to me”, she said, adding that she often wonders “where are the razors that these women are using?” when watching Jane Austen adaptations.
“They’re all kind of hairless like eels. I’m like: ‘What’s going on? It’s completely mad.’”
I think something pretty normal and understandable that people who are used to drowning in other people’s vocal paraphilias online will immediately and erroneously assume is something sexual.
texture@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
yeah id just assume the hair didnt make the final cut bc patriarchal bullshit. i dont see how this is a shitpost so much as just a shitty thing that happened? i figure we judge and control women’s bodies more than enough day to day that we dont really need it in the shitpost sub. idk, just struck a cord with me this time i guess.
PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Come back to Lemmy @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world
RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
How the hell could they even make a final cut when they didn’t have razors?
evening_push579@feddit.nu 2 hours ago
The door is there dad
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
👑