WTF is “beans and toast”? The beans should be ON the toast
Historically love sugar
Submitted 2 days ago by SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to [deleted]
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/74db6369-b233-4879-9860-746b7edb5c62.webp
Comments
Worx@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
Worx@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
Also the queen’s dead now so… yknow
gnutrino@programming.dev 2 days ago
We still have a queen she’s just not the monarch.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 day ago
The real divisive question is where is the cheese? And I’ll try to remain as neutral here as possible.
Do you melt it onto the bread, providing a protective layer and preventing the bread from absorbing too much bean juice, or do you put it on top the beans, like a psychopathic dog molester?
Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 day ago
I’m a psychopathic dog molester
Please don’t take this out of context
What a ridiculous idea to put cheese underneath your beans. Only a demented madman would even consider such an idea. That’s just shitty, ruined cheese on toast…
m4xie@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
beans and toast are the ingredients necessary to make beans on toast.
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 days ago
Do you have a sauce for that claim?
VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 2 days ago
Queueing seems like such a natural thing to do. Is it just a free for all in other places?
match@pawb.social 2 days ago
Here they take your phone number and send you a text when your whatever is ready
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I bring to you, Black Friday: www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEZ3PRPJLws
Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 days ago
No, no, no, no. Like this: youtu.be/agIEa5Z1KrI?t=48
breecher@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
The entirety of Scandinavia: Definitely not.
BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 day ago
English people. The Scottish, Welsh and Irish mostly disapprove of the monarchy. Very few people aside from the English actually like these people. I guess that goes with the territory of being a billionaire family for hundreds of years.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
english people
Oxymoron.
lobut@lemmy.ca 15 hours ago
As an English “whose-a-ma-whats-it”, I feel like a lot of us don’t care much for the monarchy as well. I don’t speak for all obviously. Many of my friends need to keep up with Royal Family drama for some reason.
B1naryB0t@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
And lots of them are just morons on Oxy
aaron@infosec.pub 1 day ago
In terms of overwhelming media coverage think of them as the Brit version of the Kardashians (maybe from a few years back no idea how often the Kardashians are in the news these days).
Other than that I think we probably never greatly reduced the role of our monarchy at the end of ww1, the way much of the rest of Europe did, because at that point we were still global reserve currency and similar to Americans today - things seemed to be going relatively well and we’d just ‘won’ ww1 so why change it? Our coal production peaked around 1921 (iirc), after that the £ began its decline before being bankrupted by ww2. We did alright with a somewhat socialist society until the late 70s, from which point neo-liberalism took over and we have raced rightwards, like the US, and the monarchy needs to go but is the least of our problems.
BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 day ago
We are wistful for the days when our biggest problem was getting rid of kings and queens. Our first order of business is getting rid of bigots and racists. Then we can focus on alleviating the stranglehold of business, which will clear the path for dealing with climate change and investing in our health and education.
TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I know a northerner who is virulently an anti-monarchist. His whole family is.
Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well they haven’t separated either so 🤷🏻♂️
Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 days ago
Whenever I hear "King Charles" I think "Who? That can't be right".
damdy@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Yeah, even me as mostly anti monarchy had some respect for the queen. Not it’s just ‘who cares.’
She did her job very well, and I’m not convinced the enormous benefits outweigh the obligations.
Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 days ago
Yeah, I always found it weird when people would act like they have it so cushy. On a material comfort level, sure, but on basically every other level it sounds awful. You couldn't pay me to put myself or my children through that.
Footballers who get paid a packet and can then vanish into obscurity if they so choose? That sounds like the good life.
Hard pass on the gilded cage thing. I'm no monarchist, so now that the single nationalised granny initiative is over I'm wondering whether we'll keep them. Inertia will probably keep it going for a while yet. Transitioning away from them seems like it'd probably somehow be even more expensive and troublesome than living with them. A bit like trying to totally rid a large building of mice.
Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 days ago
I’d have been very happy to vote for Elizabeth as the first president of the UK Republic.
Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I find your lack of tea inside this diagram to be … disturbing
baatliwala@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Maybe but ants aren’t allergic to sunlight
suswrkr@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
lol @trashfuture UK you seeing this?
rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Try queueing at a pub bar and see where that gets you
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I now have a pint of what seems to be room temperature river water. What’s next?
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
This made me chortle, to my surprise.
Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 days ago
The Brits don’t take stuff to they colony, but away from it. But if ants were sentient they’d call it an empire too, most likely.
NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
I object to this diagram. Ants would almost certainly love a plate of beans on toast too.
CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Does this mean the British are a subset of ants?
NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Well according to this diagram, there are just ants and weak ants. So, yes.
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Indeed.