No one who’s actually used Grindr likes that app. It sucks, and not in a good way. It fills its niche, but it is a horrible app and gets worse and worse with every update.
Rant over.
turing completeness
Submitted 7 hours ago by SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to [deleted]
https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/95d71dc8-a018-47e4-9ffb-c22e251e6d9d.webp
Comments
Johandea@feddit.nu 4 hours ago
Darkmuch@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Oh so it’s like all other dating apps.
ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
I read recently they’re all tuned to give you almost perfect matches with people you’ll vibe with for a few dates then end up back on the app
queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
Isn’t that just… every app?
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 4 hours ago
Haven’t used it myself but my mate seems to thoroughly enjoy it.
Why does it suck?
andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Every update decreases the amount of people you can see. Frequent, full page ads that cannot be closed out and will open up a webpage/the App Store as you try to hit the “x.” You’ll “accidentally” hit the $99.99 monthly purchase somehow because everything moves around after your conversations load and have to exit out of the confirmation for that. There are a ridiculous amount of Only Fans and bots. Often the app would rather connect you to people hundreds of miles away rather than the people in your immediate area.
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 6 hours ago
good for him tbh
blave@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
When people ask me what the difference between Reddit and Lemmy is, I can just show them this post
danc4498@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Ok, but would he think the AI bots on grindr pass the Turing test?
Hupf@feddit.org 15 minutes ago
gAI bots, you say?
danc4498@lemmy.world 1 minute ago
lol. It was right there.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Excited to hear New Labour’s position on chemically castrating one of the greatest scientists in history. Perhaps we can get some Guardian Op-Eds explaining why it is both necessary and good to drive the nation’s finest minds to suicide with constant verbal and physical abuse.
infinitebagels@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
This one hits the sweet spot of lazy and true. Passing a Turing test just means you can fake conversation better than the other thing in the room, it does not make you conscious. Call it clever autocomplete, not a soul.
Also, I have no idea who the bottom dude is in the pic, but the Grindr punchline is gloriously tacky. Internet history jokes will never die, thank god.
Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 5 hours ago
The guy at the bottom is literally labeled.
marcos@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
it does not make you conscious
That wasn’t obvious at all until a few years ago.
Anyway, I do think Turing would put as much importance on the Turing test as the meme implies. But it really looked like it predicted intelligence until we got there.
lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 3 hours ago
Fuck the Britains who destroyed his life!
TypFaffke@feddit.org 3 hours ago
Grindr is a non-deterministic Turing machine that might get you laid in linear time.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
Since when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
vodka@feddit.org 4 hours ago
Even the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests.
It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
zaph@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Considering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
I want to update but OP is at 420 ups so I wont be pressing that.
python@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Honestly I’d much rather hear Isaac Asimov’s opinion on the current state of AI. Passing the Turing Test is whatever, but how far away are LLMs from conforming to the 3 laws of Robotics?
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
The laws are not profitable, so why would they implement them? /s