Link: nitter.net/TeamFortressS2/…/1745157814295617767
Valve is generally supportive of mods (hell, a Portal 2 mod was just released a few days ago) but it seems like recreating Team Fortress 2 was pushing it… Really sad, honestly. I really hope Valve would just strike a deal with these devs and make it official rather than throw away the insane amount of effort they put into re-building TF2.
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Valve are well within their rights here. This isn’t new content or transformative. It’s literally trying to remake the same game using the same engine. These devs knew they were playing with fire. Never come between GabeN and his hats.
Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 11 months ago
My thinking is that it was hot garbage that was trying to milk the TF2 name to grow their own fanbase. And valve didn’t want to be associated with that.
My guess is that Black Mesa looks great, had passionate people who were really communicating and engaging with valve/community, and it felt like a step forward.
Cybersteel@lemmy.world 11 months ago
They got a taste of their own medicine. They should have gotten rid of those low effort, asset swop games on the store then.
Stovetop@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Makes me wonder where thir line is between this and Black Mesa, though.
gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
Black Mesa is a remake of a single player game that Valve wasn’t planning on remaking any time soon, more profitable to make it official and take a cut
TF2 actively still makes them sht tons of money, no profit in splitting the fan base
Vespair@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Imo, Trademark. Black Mesa is a concept from Half-Life, but “Black Mesa” to the best of my knowledge wasn’t a registered trademark. “Team Fortress/Team Fortress 2” are registered trademarks however, and that significantly changes the value and functionality of the specific terms.
duplexsystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
eurogamer.net/valve-gives-black-mesa-permission-t…
Mountaineer@aussie.zone 11 months ago
I’d guess the fine line is “Valve intend to earn money from something official in the future”
Vespair@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Unfortunately it’s not just well within their rights, it’s their legal obligation. The stupid situation that is America means that for them to be able to maintain their claim of ownership on the IP trademark, they have to both actively use the trademark and actively police unauthorized use of the trademark by others. If they don’t, they risk losing the right to claim the trademark, which wouldn’t just mean independents running servers for the game, but also would mean unscrupulous entities could produce and sell merchandise featuring the trademark en masse without having to seek permission from or pay any commissions to Valve.
It’s shitty, but it’s more shitty because of the stupid system we’ve built than because of any intentional malevolence on Valve’s part, imo.
Important caveat: I am not a legal professional and it is entirely possible my understanding of trademark law is flawed, but this is my earnest understanding of the situation.
baggins@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
DMCA has nothing to do with trademarks
yamanii@lemmy.world 11 months ago
No, it isn’t.
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
It being within their rights doesnt make it less shitty. Fuck IP
eskimofry@lemmy.world 11 months ago
We need to change IP and copyright law to add a “use it or lose it” clause for games that have been left to languish for eternity.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 months ago
just result in companies releasing even shittier games just to protect their IPs.
Sorgan71@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Not eternity 95 years.