Submitted 10 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to games@lemmy.world
Link: nitter.net/TeamFortressS2/…/1745157814295617767
Valve is generally supportive of mods (hell, a Portal 2 mod was just released a few days ago) but it seems like recreating Team Fortress 2 was pushing it… Really sad, honestly. I really hope Valve would just strike a deal with these devs and make it official rather than throw away the insane amount of effort they put into re-building TF2.
Portal 2 isn’t an ongoing live online multiplayer game with in game purchases.
He has a point here. TF2 is a F2P game that generates is revenue these days from marketplace and key transactions. If someone were to remake the entire game and it was allowed to release, it would most assuredly damage TF2’s revenue. A mod for Portal 2 has more potential to generate revenue because anyone interested in the mod that doesn’t currently own Portal 2, would have to buy the game.
Is it right to push more gambling based micro transactions in a game that lacks actual support?
If this were any other company people would be raging
The GitHub DMCA report linked in that post seems fake to me. It's unprofessionally written and has many mistakes and inconsistencies across it.
Making a Portal mod is much different than possessing and using the original source code of a game. I don’t understand why they thought they could get away with such a high-profile title as TF.
if there’s one rule to modding valve games, it’s “don’t touch GabeN’s hat and skin sales”. TF2 despite being a real mess and valve’s server being practically unplayable, still brings in millions of dollars of gambling money, and now that CS2 keys are not tradable TF2 keys are in demand for laundering money. of course they are gonna take down a direct remake of their live service game minus all the bots and shitty cosmetics.
Not exactly. Plenty of CS mods give players knife skins and things while on the server for doing things in the server. They only work while in that server, but Valve doesn’t care. Releasing a product that could be mistaken for an official product is not smart though. They just released Counter Strike 2 (which was called CS Source 2 for a long time) so they have to defend their IP from confusion. This isnt likely about money because this wouldn’t hurt that in the slightest. Who had even heard of it before this post? It’s just something they have to do legally.
Seems like they were already planning on stopping the project anyways, Valve’s DMCA just happened to come while they were already deliberating on it:
While we were discussing the project’s future internally recently, we already came to the conclusion to stop the development of the project due to the current state of the code being unusable anymore with s&box’s recent major engine changes, and that we overall moved on from it.
Sadly, this means this DMCA takedown is the nail in the coffin. We cannot bring it back and we’ve hit Valve’s attention, it seems like they definitely don’t want us to use their IP (which is totally fair and legal from them).
I’d be more supportive of Valve if Team Fortress 2 wasn’t a dumpster fire to play in 2024. The game is infested with bots that make anything outside of independently moderated community servers unplayable.
Even Counter Strike 2 has dogshit anticheat despite the boasts that VAC Live was a solution that could surpass Vanguard, to the point where the only good competitive experience you can have is to play on FaceIt or ESEA servers with their own ring 0 anticheat solution.
If you can only have a good experience by installing malware, you don’t have a good experience.
I really should finish building that nvidia jetson based hardware anticheat that’d allow anyone to cheat even in vanguard protected games with perfect accuracy for just ~150$. Ring 0 anticheat’s only use is to spy on you and yet people will continue defending it until someone’s proven just how useless it is.
I don’t play Valorant, but I never heard my friend that does getting pissed at cheaters over there, compared to my friends that play CS2.
I mean TF 2 is 16 years old. They just don’t really support it anymore. I can’t comprehend how it’s still in or close to the top 10 steam games by player count when it’s been dead for years.
It got 14 new maps last year and hit a new concurrent player count record. It’s not even remotely dead.
I just wish Valve wasn’t pulling a Nintendo and not aiding the fans of a game they care about, instead of just sitting on it and claiming they are doing all they can for it.
How long has it been since we were promised a major update after Jungle Inferno? How long since Valve promised community fixes? How long since Valve delayed it with “we’re working hard on making it next update”? How long did Valve say they heard the community loud and clear about the bot crisis?
TF2 is my all time favorite game, but it’s no longer really playable in 2024. Casual servers are infested with bots, and there’s been no major changes to the game since 2017. I wish Valve cared about the game as much as the community still does dozens of years later.
Not all games need to be officially supported forever, tbh.
You can easily run your own server for it, so like UT99 or so, fans can form communities and play.
Basically, I’d rather them put effort into a Team Fortress 3, even though I know that’s of course utopian given we never got an HL3 either.
If they don’t want to support it that’s fine but they should stop releasing new micro transactions then
why do peopoe bot?
To get in-game drops as far as I know.
They most certainly made a decision based on priorities and TF2 wasn’t a big enough one for them to jump on. If there were enough users who would pay clamoring for it, they’d move.
In this game, players must arrange characters and scenes to complete story objectives presented at each level. The challenge lies in figuring out the right combination to achieve the desired outcome. storyteller rewards players for their creative thinking and ability to solve narrative puzzles, offering endless ways to approach storytelling.
Valve seems okay with TF2 mods on the older engine… See tf2classic.com
I feel like the TF2Classic ran into dmca issues earlier in their dev cycle as well.
Is tf2classic any good? I loved tf2, but the bots just made it unplayable
Being a TF2 fan is fucking suffering…
being a valve fan is fucking suffering.
They used to make great games, but they have no need to anymore cause steam brings in $$$$Texas.
Create beautiful harmonies by controlling a group of animated blobs that sing together. In blob opera, you can adjust each blob’s pitch to form unique musical pieces. The game’s goal is to inspire creativity and provide a fun, interactive platform for exploring music.
it’s also important to consider that recreating an entire game like Tunnel Rush Team Fortress 2 would involve legal and intellectual property considerations.
lol did these morons really think they were going to get away with literally trying to steal an IP? ROFL
Life lessons for these people.
This comment would only make sense if they were being indignant about it.
Yeah, how dare they make something enjoyable for the community! Everyone should suffer under valve’s dragging of their feet over TF2 promises.
Everyone should suffer under valve’s dragging of their feet over TF2 promises.
Ah so because Valve isn’t updating the game on an interval you’re ok with that gives them the right to steal IP?
You can make anything you want for the community. But if you do it while stealing an IP then that puts you in the wrong.
It’s pretty simple kid.
When does valve drop everything 3? There must be development for all the sequels working in the background, right?
no I don’t think so. they run steam instead.
Explore musical creativity by conducting a quartet of animated blobs. In blob opera, you adjust their pitch and vowel sounds to create beautiful harmonies. The goal is to have fun and experiment with music, with each blob offering a unique vocal contribution to your compositions.
If I had to guess a real reason why: a new TF game in Source 2, or something similar is in the works at Valve. It may never make it out of pre-production, but it wouldn’t surprise me.
It would surprise me if they did it to capitalize on Overwatch, which would show that Valve leadership can’t make an original idea.
Team Fortress 3? Everyone know that Valve can’t count beyond 3.
And the Lord spake, saying, “First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then, shalt thou count to two. No more. No less. Two shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shalt be two. Three shalt thou not count, nor either count thou one, excepting that thou then proceed to two. Four is right out. Once the number two, being the second number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it.”
Dino Game is a simple but attractive running game built into the Google Chrome browser. With classic pixel graphics and easy gameplay, the game takes players on an endless adventure with the T-Rex dinosaur, dodging obstacles like cacti and pterodactyls. https://dinogame.app/
It seems like it would have been a lot more friendly to have reached out personally first instead of via lawyers initially. Seems like these guys would have been receptive.
Maybe there’s some legal reason they couldn’t, but doesn’t seem like it to me.
how do you know they didnt
I guess I don’t. I would have assumed the team would have mentioned it. Especially if there was communication, but it moved forward to DMCA request anyway (i.e. there was a disagreement or something). But seems like the team would have responded pretty quickly.
But yeah, I don’t know for sure.
Still, it seems way more likely that Valve legal just went straight to DMCA.
There is nothing novel or revolutionary about this. Using the same engine, it tries to recreate the exact same game. They were aware that they were playing with fire, these developers. spacebar clicker
blob opera is a fantastic blend of fun and education, providing an incredibly engaging way to experiment with music.
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Valve are well within their rights here. This isn’t new content or transformative. It’s literally trying to remake the same game using the same engine. These devs knew they were playing with fire. Never come between GabeN and his hats.
Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 10 months ago
My thinking is that it was hot garbage that was trying to milk the TF2 name to grow their own fanbase. And valve didn’t want to be associated with that.
My guess is that Black Mesa looks great, had passionate people who were really communicating and engaging with valve/community, and it felt like a step forward.
Cybersteel@lemmy.world 10 months ago
They got a taste of their own medicine. They should have gotten rid of those low effort, asset swop games on the store then.
Stovetop@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Makes me wonder where thir line is between this and Black Mesa, though.
gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Black Mesa is a remake of a single player game that Valve wasn’t planning on remaking any time soon, more profitable to make it official and take a cut
TF2 actively still makes them sht tons of money, no profit in splitting the fan base
Vespair@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Imo, Trademark. Black Mesa is a concept from Half-Life, but “Black Mesa” to the best of my knowledge wasn’t a registered trademark. “Team Fortress/Team Fortress 2” are registered trademarks however, and that significantly changes the value and functionality of the specific terms.
duplexsystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 months ago
eurogamer.net/valve-gives-black-mesa-permission-t…
Mountaineer@aussie.zone 10 months ago
I’d guess the fine line is “Valve intend to earn money from something official in the future”
Vespair@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Unfortunately it’s not just well within their rights, it’s their legal obligation. The stupid situation that is America means that for them to be able to maintain their claim of ownership on the IP trademark, they have to both actively use the trademark and actively police unauthorized use of the trademark by others. If they don’t, they risk losing the right to claim the trademark, which wouldn’t just mean independents running servers for the game, but also would mean unscrupulous entities could produce and sell merchandise featuring the trademark en masse without having to seek permission from or pay any commissions to Valve.
It’s shitty, but it’s more shitty because of the stupid system we’ve built than because of any intentional malevolence on Valve’s part, imo.
Important caveat: I am not a legal professional and it is entirely possible my understanding of trademark law is flawed, but this is my earnest understanding of the situation.
baggins@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
DMCA has nothing to do with trademarks
yamanii@lemmy.world 10 months ago
No, it isn’t.
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
It being within their rights doesnt make it less shitty. Fuck IP
eskimofry@lemmy.world 10 months ago
We need to change IP and copyright law to add a “use it or lose it” clause for games that have been left to languish for eternity.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 months ago
just result in companies releasing even shittier games just to protect their IPs.
Sorgan71@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Not eternity 95 years.