You can tell that you live in a society that’s about to totally collapse when you see signs like this.
Only boomers can use this bench. Meanwhile, they're trying to get rid of their own property taxes.
Submitted 2 weeks ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/2ebdf694-fcc6-46d2-b381-38a33523b748.jpeg
Comments
obvs@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Or what? You get a ticket if you’re not old enough? If you have a problem with not enough benches for everyone, maybe just make more benches? Not like they are expensive.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
$1500 plus installation and ongoing cleaning and maintenance, plus each one probably adds to insurance.
Better use of tax revenue than hiring another cop, though. In fact they could afford more benches if they fired a couple of cops, that would be a good trade.
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Or suggest they don’t spend money they don’t have on flock mass surveillance cameras
Kissaki@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
“Oh, sorry, I didn’t see the notice. Maybe it should be more obvious.”
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The anti-property tax propaganda is from the real estate hoarding corporate owners. As usual, these anti-tax wingnuts latch on to “why should I pay property tax (insert selfish reason here)” when the real reason is the real estate hoarding companies don’t want to pay property taxes on all the properties they’ve hoarded and are likely sitting empty. The same properties they used to price people out of homebuying, the same ones they used to increase rent super high because you can’t afford a home and will own nothing.
And of course anti-tax wingnuts don’t care that property taxes pay for schools, police, fire services,etc. (ain’t got no kids so why should I pay for school? My house has never burned down. Who needs cops when I got a Smith and Wesson?) and those things will still have to be paid for via some kind of tax, so in the end they still pay but the absentee owners get a huge tax break.
TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Whats the age are you considered a “senior”? I got the handicap part already, so thats nice…
(it actually sucks, but I make the best of it)
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
4th year of highschool
TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yeah yeah yeah you’re technically correct :)
11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Jokes on you. Fewshman year of highschool was the best 6 years of my life.
Kissaki@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
If my job role is senior that counts, eight?
TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
In my book… Yes.
/Sr Engineer that almost a senior, this is like inception shit! I need a pizza delivery guys, ladders, and firefighters STAT!
mrmisses@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think it’s 55
TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Dang almost there… Where do the years go eh?
CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
This is so ridiculous I hope it’s fake.
TransNeko@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s America… I’m sure it’s not only real but enforceable with jail time.
Generica@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’m Gen-X and we usually get dumped in with the Boomers here in the US. However, ours was the first generation to get fucked. Like all those golden pensions of yesteryear dried up and disappeared as soon as we began entering the job force. So those a little older than us are kickin’ back enjoying 70% of their retirement pay or whatever, often with health insurance (as opposed to Medicare), and we’re stuck with shitty 401Ks that yield not only less assets but less secured assets because you can easily go through your entire benefits before you die, as opposed to the pension system. And, of course, our retirement today doesn’t typically come with any auxiliary benefits such as healthcare. Plus most of us are simultaneously assisting our elderly surviving parents and adult children simultaneously!
CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Plus most of us are assisting our elderly surviving parents
I keep seeing this with people I know, including my spouse and myself. We have spent our entire marriage so far taking care of old family members. Why us? Because my wife is literally the only competent person anyone in her family knows. And she’s very caring and compassionate.
Or she was. None of the elderly people we have supported have been nice or easy to care for. My wife got tired of feeling used. We have decided that we are no longer an unpaid skilled nursing service and therefore we are the most heartless people to have ever existed. It has not been popular but there aren’t yet laws demanding we take care of them.
My family, on the other hand, is more organized and generally heathier. But i have still explained to my parents that they had better have a plan, because we aren’t it.
And I wonder, how many other genx and millenials have made this same decision? How many will sleep on the Boomer-only bench?
magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Your generation was also one of the few to literally fucking try nothing.
Say what you will about boomers, they had the civil rights movement, they had the ant-war movement. You don’t get a Kent state without pissing off the right people. Don’t get me wrong, they all became fucking turncoats at 25 when they fucked off to daddies company, but for a split second they did something that mattered.
Between the civil rights movement and the post-9/11 anti-war movement there was barely any fucking political action here in the states. The only thing I could think of was the LA Riots, and a huge chunk of you assholes spent it praising “roof Koreans.”
The only bit of youthful rebellion your generation had was manufactured and sold to you by your parents generation via music videos pre-packaged by one of three major record labels, and delivered by a cable channel owned and operated by viacom. Fucking VIACOM.
Y’all where a bunch of fucking posers who said “good enough”, because yall collectively thought what came next would be your kids problems and not yours.
jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
We got gay marriage, can you edit that into your revisionist history
jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
We DIDN’T swing massively fascist despite the Skull and Bones crowd doing their best to wag the dog
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Looks like a private sign posted on private property. Can be ignored.
lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
At least add pregnant women so you’re not a complete dick.
But honestly, fuck this noise.
Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Pregnancy is a disability
trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Surely, that sign is more expensive than any sort of additional maintenance cost from people using your bench…?
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I doubt this is about bench maintenance and more about giving and excuse to chase homeless people and kids away from the area. In other places they just use bench designs that are uncomfortable or make it impossible to lay down.
poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
It also mentions citizens so presumably they can chase away anyone who doesn’t look like a citizen
trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Ah, well that’s just fucking lovely. So, presumably they’re legally required to put a bench there, but they would also rather not have anyone actually exist there…
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Where I live they also have housing exclusive to 55+ so it’s much cheaper since there’s a smaller market for them.
Ruins the housing economy and then holds some that’s only available for themselves for cheap while they downsize for a massive nestegg.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 weeks ago
It is generally cheaper where I live because towns have to build affordable housing and it is considered more acceptable to have poor elderly people than poor people with children.
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
The 55+ areas where I live are generally little rancher communities or apartments, some are low income type apartments but many are also luxury type apartments.
I could understand if the apartments or ranchers were built with accessibility in mind like shower bars and taller toilets, etc.
But mostly it’s just because they don’t like screaming children playing in the neighbourhood.
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
it should be more acceptable to be poor and childless than to drag someone into thw world without a way to support them.
spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Is it a problem that the 55+ housing lowers prices of other housing in the area, or that seniors are selling their old homes and actually keeping the money from the sale?
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
In the area I live in there’s a lot of places 55+ so it limits the amount of housing in the city available to working class people and those trying to raise families, increasing their housing prices. The community has a lot of old folks.
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Wait, so we’re supposed to have walkable cities and towns to minimize vehicle use, but we can’t also have the equivalent of handicapped parking for the folks that need it most?
I’m not sure what’s infuriating about this. It’s exactly the same principle as handicapped parking, and there should be more of these.
Yeah, ideally you’d have enough benches around so that everyone can cop a squat as needed/wanted. But let’s be fucking real here, a healthy, able bodied person in their twenties or thirties isn’t going to need a seat as often.
Also, fuck that boomer stupidity. We’re supposed to make a world that allows our elderly to have freedom of access and personal mobility. Idgaf what empty headed shit you have against actually baby boomers, we are all going to get old, die, or die before getting old. It’s about fucking supporting each other when we’re in need. Today’s boomers? Well, you’ll be them in fifty years and looking back at this and think “holy fuck, I wish I had a place to sit before trying this next block” this shit helps you, your mother, your uncle, and eventually your kids.
Gtfo with your ablist, ageist shit
pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
What a reactionary zealot response.
This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.
I’ll explain it with a comparision of the language used.
The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: “Priority seating. Please stand for seniors, pregnant, or handicapped people”.
Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.
The language used in this sign: “Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only”
Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you’re not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs. Pregnant women? Who cares, they’re not old and they’re women.
This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it’s embedded into every aspect of US society without most people even noticing because they’ve never seen different.
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Handicapped citizens is a term used to be neutral in most places, nor exclusionary for non citizens
pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
If it was a “senior and handicapped priority” seat it’d be fine, but literally not letting anyone else sit on it is messed up.
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
How about put the bench there, and then if people are using it to the point the disabled and elderly can’t use it, add the sign. I get what your saying comparing it to handicapped parking, but IMO it’s a false equivalent. I’ve personally never seen a parking lot that was handicapped parking exclusively and people park there cars and can leave them there for hours as opposed to sitting on a bench for ~5-10 minutes at a bench and since you are physically present, you can get up of someone needs the spot more.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Many boomers are struggling to make ends meet
Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 2 weeks ago
You mean “ends seat?”
tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
In my town benches are the recreational place for teenagers. What are teens/young people supposed to do?
mrlemmyhimself@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Spend their parents money or get fucked
tigermountain@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You do realize that one day you too might be a senior citizen or handicapped, right?
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
What if they’re a homeless boomer? An unmovable object means an irresistible force.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’m disabled, but I’ll gleefully cut the sign down and piss all over it in broad daylight. Anybody tries to stop me and it becomes a piss-coated harpoon. Every day if necessary, until they get the message.
That level of petty bullshit goes right back where it came from. I’m not at all opposed of going lower than my opponent - wtf are they going to do, try to get public and legal support for harassing a disabled person? Lmao
melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
What about the younger handicap’s? Are they all screwed because of those stinking Boomers? One day in the distant future we’ll need to do something about those Boomers. /s
BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The point is to create a rule that they can selectively enforce.
tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Kids don’t play outside anymore. Also Why are there kids outside!!!
Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 weeks ago
Gen X is elderly now, too.
starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Are you saying only boomers can be disabled?
Bazoogle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
They’re saying it’s absurd to try to stop anyone from using a public bench
svdasein@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think we may have bigger fish to fry these days; billionaires love it when little people fight amongst themselves. It’s high comedy because in the mean time they’re well on their way to owning everything.
pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I disagree wholeheartedly. This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.
I’ll explain it with a comparision of the language used.
The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: “Priority seating. Please stand for seniors and handicapped people”.
Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.
The language used in this sign: “Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only”
Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you’re not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs.
This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it’s embedded into every aspect of your society without most people even noticing because they’ve never seen different.
svdasein@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I don’t disagree with you. My point is simply that in the US right now there’s a concerted effort to keep the citizenry in a frenzy of angry finger pointing to distract us from the fact that we are being robbed blind by the “Epstein class”. The issues are real, but these are relatively small issues in comparison. Those folks pay actual money to keep us doing this shit and it works. In the US we have a desperate need to understand that this is engineered, and the engineers are laughing their asses off at the screaming rabble.
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
You’re not wrong… But the crossover age range of the vast majority of billionaires and seniors is a damned circle, it’s both a class and age thing simultaneously. Boomers are usually defined as those born between 1946 and 1964, so that age range would be 62-80 as of 2026.
And that ignores the much larger number of them that are under a billion but still well on their way up towards it. In practicality, there’s little difference between 100 million and a billion despite it being 90% less.