He would want to be remembered this way, and I think we should honor his wishes.
This is art
Submitted 2 weeks ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c00b056b-f358-4eb7-9859-c4b2975aba92.jpeg
Comments
crank0271@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
db2@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Bless you
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Well, better than AI art.
agavaa@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The jury is still out.
kokesh@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The face is too big. Thoughts and prayers
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
has the kirk face size slider dude added this to the suite of choices? because they should
kokesh@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
if this is a troll, then it definitely is a troll king
merc@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
It’s great when art is so bad that it’s hard to tell if the artist is trolling or just terrible.
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Reminds me of the unintentionally hilarious statue of nathan bedford forrest, and for exactly the same reasons.
SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
I knew it was him before I clicked. The resemblance is hilarious :D
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I am utterly convinced that someone in the process of that statues creation either hated the Confederates or Forrest in particular. Also that is the only confederate statue I wouldn’t scrap.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That was unintentional?
edinbruh@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
It’s fucking Frida Kahlo
Rustic_Fry@literature.cafe 2 weeks ago
Damn, shots fired with that portrait
jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
But who won the Pick-4 in Glendale?
TheFlopster@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I can’t bring myself to mock something that someone probably made out of genuine love. It makes me too sad. No matter how much of a piece of shit Charlie might have been.
Mocking it feels like the opposite of empathy. I know how much he didn’t believe in empathy, but as usual, he was wrong. So I’m displaying some. Not for him. But for whoever made this for him.
Rothe@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
If the person who made this genuinely loved Charlie Kirk, then it is 100% they are a bigoted asshole. So you should not feel bad about mocking it in the slightest.
TheFlopster@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I guess I just assumed it was s child. Based on the skill level.
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Some day, they’ll learn what he was. If that doesn’t put an end to any residual positive feelings for him, I don’t have a shit to give about how they take the well-deserved vicious mockery.
CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
I empathise with a will to make art out of genuine passion, but I empathise even more so with the ability to keep your eyes open on wether the result represents your intentions and how to make it to do so.
Like, I’m genuinely frustrated every time i see people compliment a genuinely bad artwork. Yes, no one wants to discourage the artistic tendencies in anyone, as it feels cruel to do so, but damn, are you even sharing your work because of your satisfaction with it, becaure you want to know how to do better, or are you doing so simply to get a cheap serotonine boost, because you know i’m too polite to tell you that your artwork sucks?
tetris11@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Yes, but also
Image
MML@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I could but I honestly think the person who made this is mentally challenged, the text varying in size is usually indicative of a mental disorder.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
or a degree in medicine
0ops@piefed.zip 2 weeks ago
Image