Wizard_Pope
@Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 1 hour ago:
I never implied it’s too many. I just said I cannot think of a way to use 15 ports (as in my personal setup). Might not have been the most clear but never implied it.
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 2 hours ago:
Fuck’s sake I was just asking what they were using it for that they filled out 15 ports and everyone is attacking me for thinking 15 is too much or something.
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 2 hours ago:
Yeah that was my main thing. It can be done but most people don’t need all of those plugged in constantly
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
Well I am currently using about 5-6 ports on my PC and 2 of those are not really needed. I can imagine using a couple more but certainly not 15
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
I can hardly imagine needing 15 ports at the same time.
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
And you have all those constantly plugged in? I’ probably hate the cable mess
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
Ah I see. So it’s more like plugging in 5-10 things exceeds the limit.
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
With what though? Just curious
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
That would make sense. Didn’t think of it.
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 3 hours ago:
I am just asking what they are doing to need that as I cannot think of anything off the top of my head
- Comment on its actually worse bc ports are counted twice for 2.0 & 3.0 4 hours ago:
Okay but what kind of application is it used for that you exceed 15 ports filled??
- Comment on That's how the world works. 21 hours ago:
If they cannot afford a yard what makes you think they have space to spare inside to grow stuff??
- Comment on What a nice blue and black dress. 4 days ago:
No problem. I know the true colour but looking at the actual image I cannot force myself to see it as blue and black. It always looks white and gold even though that makes no sense if you analyse the image even slightly. It has to be in the light but my brains just refuses to see it that way.
- Comment on What a nice blue and black dress. 5 days ago:
I know I wa stalking about the OG photo. Though to be honest even the edited one does not look completely blue and black to me. I know the dress is blue and black in reality.
- Comment on What a nice blue and black dress. 5 days ago:
I am not colourblind afaik and I could not for the llife pf me see it as blue and black. The lighting just made no sense fpr that to be the case.
- Comment on Horrorposting 6 days ago:
That’s dedication
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Is the Mickey guy gone?
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
I did not even have to check who the OP is
- Comment on Crankin' Hogg 1 week ago:
I am truly conflicted looking at this AI image
- Comment on Can't get better than this 1 week ago:
Bogger range of motion. More desk space. Sturdier build, nicer finish.
- Comment on Can't get better than this 1 week ago:
Well yes but that one is not as good. As I said a new one of those is still selling for arpund 700€. It’s just a better desk.
- Comment on Can't get better than this 1 week ago:
I was so close to getting one of those desks for 100€ used when someone listed it on a used items website (a new one goes for like 700€ or so). Literally saw the add go up the same day. I kept messaging them on the app every 2 weeks or so without any responses.
Then they replied 4 months later telling me the item has already been sold. How? To whom? How did they contact you? The ad was only on one singular website afaik and they had no contact info listed.
I am still mad about it to this day.
- Comment on rules 1 week ago:
- Comment on oopsie poopsies 2 weeks ago:
OP being the piss meme or the one I linked? Bcause Albert’s hand is doing this
- Comment on oopsie poopsies 2 weeks ago:
Yeah sure. But even this has 2 sources you can check (in case you don’t believe it) and there is literally no reason to falsify info on what you have without any check at all claimed to be AI generated imagery.
I believe in such a trivial case the source citation really is not necessary. It’s a god damn meme image.
- Comment on oopsie poopsies 2 weeks ago:
I get it in a way but they do literally 0 work to check. Like the main argument they made for this image is the hands. They look fine.
- Comment on oopsie poopsies 2 weeks ago:
Image is over 15 years old.
- Comment on oopsie poopsies 2 weeks ago:
Fingers are fine and the image is over 15 years old
- Comment on oopsie poopsies 2 weeks ago:
Why the fuck is everyone calling this image AI slop?? It’s been around for ages and does not have any signs of AI making it.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
If you fit. My gf is so much smaller than me (more accurately I am much taller/bigger, she is about average size) that it quite literally dors not work. I can barely kiss her normaly without breaking both our necks during sex.
