that’s kinda understandable tbh
Bluesky
Submitted 4 weeks ago by LodeMike@lemmy.today to [deleted]
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/8dcc2656-d90d-4250-bc91-40a48fdd3e5a.png
Comments
Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You’re right and I hate it. The rich and powerful should have fewer protections. Not more
Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Everyone should be protected from having their consent violated, regardless of how despicable of a human they are. Human rights extend to all. The right to consent is non negotiable. We should just guillotine them instead. Quick and painless, but gruesome enough to set a good example.
thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
We can’t post videos, but he can spew hatred and lies? And his videos of Trump Gaza? Makes sense.
Akrenion@slrpnk.net 4 weeks ago
He never posts on bluesky. That kind of hatred gets you banned there as well. The standards are there.
sploosh@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Some people get off on toe sucking and porn is produced featuring it. If you put someone else’s face in porn that they didn’t consent to be in you’re on the wrong side of ethics.
Those horrible bastards are more wrong and should be stopped, but nonconsentual porn isn’t right.
jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
We could make a copypasta. Long. Detailed. Horny.
Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I very much dislike moral exceptions
andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
The question is how quick they’re to remove non consensual porn of the rich and powerful.
Middle schoolers are doing this shit to harass each other and it destroys lives. Lots of platforms are pretty negligent.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I think it is fair to say that the two are not the same. The trump thing probably had millions of views. They didn’t have to look hard to find it. Now I agree, they need to do better with moderation that involves kids, especially. Such things should actually be stopped before they are even posted. But I am not going to ding them for taking quick action on something that was brought to thier attention.
inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
The non consensual part would be my poor eyes seeing it but I’m not on Bluesky because it’s a corporate imitation of federation
samus12345@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Is it? I thought it was just an imitation of Twitter. In what way does it even pretend to be federated?
Genius@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
You can spin up your own Bluesky instance
…which is still managed by the Bluesky central server and can’t connect to peer instances without that server.
scoobford@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
How else would you pretend to be federated besides saying you’re federated when you aren’t?
inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
The tech stuff is above my pay grade but essentially my understanding is the code is open source and one could start their own server on the platform theoretically but no one does
Telorand@reddthat.com 4 weeks ago
Don’t hurt the poor fascists’ feewings, y’all!
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
Womp womp, that didnt take long. Only downhill for Bluesky from here on.
vinyl@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Relax they put it back up
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
What does that change? Its about the system and their ability to do so from a central control point. Bluesky was doomed before it started with how it is set up and governed.
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 4 weeks ago
The fact it was taken down tells you everything you need to know about BS.
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 4 weeks ago
To think people are joining Bluesky like it’s totally different to Xitter…
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
The sooner the enshittification happens the more likely they are to learn
Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Its not explicit and it is a public figure AND a current news story. Imo, it seems like poor judgement.
cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Which is probably why the decision was reverted.
rumba@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Its not explicit I could see people going either way on that. I think it’s safe to say few people want to see that and the vast majority don’t want to see it more than once.
it is a public figure AND a current news story. true
Imo, it seems like poor judgement. Probably, but it’s also pretty understandable. Generally how that kind of stuff is handled in media is to report on it, link to it and tell people what’s in the link, let them decide.
DickFiasco@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
How do we really know it was nonconsensual though?
Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Just the doubt is enough to not do it. Unless you ask the same question about the myriad of porn videos which circulate the internet
CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I guess this normalizes foot fetishes. They’re gonna be fucked when people start sexually fetishizing people who are fully clothed in photographs
Banana@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Start?
vinyl@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
What
elfin8er@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Would the fediverse be able to handle something like this differently?
jaschen@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
It just depends on the instance you’re on. The tankie instances, it’s gone.
elfin8er@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Yea, but users on the tankie instances would still be able to see it in their federated feed, right? I think the majority of federated instances would need to all agree to censor it.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
Huh? I can still see it.
CoffeeKills@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It was tho there has to be a line. Feet stuff is literally a fetish.
figjam@midwest.social 4 weeks ago
Well, someone link it already!
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
Per the original article:
Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Wait, you mean to tell me this meme didn’t have the full context included? Am I to believe that I shouldn’t take memes seriously and get into fights on the internet with strangers?!
someguy3@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Newsworthy context?
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
It was playing on a ton of government TVs and no one knew how to turn it off. That leads to some articles.
MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
404media is great as always. Interesting comments about the legality of this.