Bluesky

Comments

• Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Per the original article:

  Update: After this article was published, Bluesky restored Kabas’ post and told 404 Media the following: “This was a case of our moderators applying the policy for non-consensual AI content strictly. After re-evaluating the newsworthy context, the moderation team is reinstating those posts.”

  source

  • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Wait, you mean to tell me this meme didn’t have the full context included? Am I to believe that I shouldn’t take memes seriously and get into fights on the internet with strangers?!

    source
  • someguy3@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Newsworthy context?

    source

    • Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It was playing on a ton of government TVs and no one knew how to turn it off. That leads to some articles.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    404media is great as always. Interesting comments about the legality of this.

    source
• Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  that’s kinda understandable tbh

  source

  • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You’re right and I hate it. The rich and powerful should have fewer protections. Not more

    source

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Everyone should be protected from having their consent violated, regardless of how despicable of a human they are. Human rights extend to all. The right to consent is non negotiable. We should just guillotine them instead. Quick and painless, but gruesome enough to set a good example.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    We can’t post videos, but he can spew hatred and lies? And his videos of Trump Gaza? Makes sense.

    source

    • Akrenion@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      He never posts on bluesky. That kind of hatred gets you banned there as well. The standards are there.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • sploosh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Some people get off on toe sucking and porn is produced featuring it. If you put someone else’s face in porn that they didn’t consent to be in you’re on the wrong side of ethics.

      Those horrible bastards are more wrong and should be stopped, but nonconsentual porn isn’t right.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      We could make a copypasta. Long. Detailed. Horny.

      source
    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I very much dislike moral exceptions

      source
  • andros_rex@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The question is how quick they’re to remove non consensual porn of the rich and powerful.

    Middle schoolers are doing this shit to harass each other and it destroys lives. Lots of platforms are pretty negligent.

    source

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I think it is fair to say that the two are not the same. The trump thing probably had millions of views. They didn’t have to look hard to find it. Now I agree, they need to do better with moderation that involves kids, especially. Such things should actually be stopped before they are even posted. But I am not going to ding them for taking quick action on something that was brought to thier attention.

      source
• inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The non consensual part would be my poor eyes seeing it but I’m not on Bluesky because it’s a corporate imitation of federation

  source

  • samus12345@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Is it? I thought it was just an imitation of Twitter. In what way does it even pretend to be federated?

    source

    • Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You can spin up your own Bluesky instance

      …which is still managed by the Bluesky central server and can’t connect to peer instances without that server.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • scoobford@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      How else would you pretend to be federated besides saying you’re federated when you aren’t?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The tech stuff is above my pay grade but essentially my understanding is the code is open source and one could start their own server on the platform theoretically but no one does

      source
• Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Don’t hurt the poor fascists’ feewings, y’all!

  source
• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Womp womp, that didnt take long. Only downhill for Bluesky from here on.

  source

  • vinyl@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Relax they put it back up

    source

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      What does that change? Its about the system and their ability to do so from a central control point. Bluesky was doomed before it started with how it is set up and governed.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The fact it was taken down tells you everything you need to know about BS.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    To think people are joining Bluesky like it’s totally different to Xitter…

    source

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The sooner the enshittification happens the more likely they are to learn

      source
• Fedizen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Its not explicit and it is a public figure AND a current news story. Imo, it seems like poor judgement.

  source

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Which is probably why the decision was reverted.

    source
  • rumba@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Its not explicit I could see people going either way on that. I think it’s safe to say few people want to see that and the vast majority don’t want to see it more than once.

    it is a public figure AND a current news story. true

    Imo, it seems like poor judgement. Probably, but it’s also pretty understandable. Generally how that kind of stuff is handled in media is to report on it, link to it and tell people what’s in the link, let them decide.

    source
• DickFiasco@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  How do we really know it was nonconsensual though?

  source

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Just the doubt is enough to not do it. Unless you ask the same question about the myriad of porn videos which circulate the internet

    source
• CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I guess this normalizes foot fetishes. They’re gonna be fucked when people start sexually fetishizing people who are fully clothed in photographs

  source

  • Banana@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Start?

    source
  • vinyl@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    What

    source
• elfin8er@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Would the fediverse be able to handle something like this differently?

  source

  • jaschen@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It just depends on the instance you’re on. The tankie instances, it’s gone.

    source

    • elfin8er@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Yea, but users on the tankie instances would still be able to see it in their federated feed, right? I think the majority of federated instances would need to all agree to censor it.

      source
• Lumidaub@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Huh? I can still see it.

  source
• CoffeeKills@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It was tho there has to be a line. Feet stuff is literally a fetish.

  source
• figjam@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Well, someone link it already!

  source