Lumidaub
@Lumidaub@feddit.org
- Comment on How long after starting Vitamin D supplements should you notice results? 1 day ago:
Afaik, people in industrialised countries are likely to be vitamin D deficient. However, any vitamin supplements should ideally only be taken if a doctor has told you you do have a deficiency. But I get that this is hard to accomplish in some places and it’s easier to just try on your own so no judgement, just saying.
What makes you think you’re deficient? Because a generally bad mood may just be the expected reaction to the Current Global Situation™.
- Comment on People follow this guy for advice? 2 days ago:
And you propagate his nonsense further. His follower count (read: people who throw money at him) increases every time there’s any coverage anywhere.
Btw, what he’s probably saying is that having just one woman is weak and any real manly masculine man has multiple women doing his bidding. The way he phrases it is specifically designed to farm rage engagement because he’s very good at that.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 3 days ago:
Yep, good thing none of us has done that.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 3 days ago:
Yeah, I read that. I still reserve the right to reject your analogy because I don’t accept it as relevant or analogue to anything. You can’t go “don’t say these things that disagree with me” and expect me to shrug my shoulders and go along.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 3 days ago:
I mean, your analogies that fall apart at the premise don’t really help.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 3 days ago:
Yeah, that’s one way to (not) answer.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 3 days ago:
You start that “analogy” with the binary assumption. That’s where it falls apart.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 4 days ago:
Yeah. So “nearby structures” determine sex, not “size of gametes”. What are they nearby? Possibly nothing.
- Comment on Insulin 4 days ago:
You’d THINK capitalism would cause that to happen, wouldn’t you?
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 4 days ago:
So sex is determined by what structures medical professionals expect to be there.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 5 days ago:
Cool, you’re only now even contemplating what I’ve been talking about for several posts. Ovarian agenesis, Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, anorchia.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 5 days ago:
The spherical cow does exist though, it’s in the teeny tiny slivers in the OP’s post.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 5 days ago:
So it’s not the size of gametes but some secondary structures vaguely involved in the development of structures that are involved in the production of gametes. Did I get that right?
- Comment on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’ 5 days ago:
Thank you for your concern.
- Comment on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’ 5 days ago:
This is still “you’re the minority, better follow the herd, just saying”.
- Comment on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’ 5 days ago:
Tech bros, for some reason always trying to use group pressure as a legitimate argument.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
There’s nothing about the production of gametes in there.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
Let me rephrase that: people without ovaries, uterus, vagina or testes. Nowhere in their bodies. They have a vulva or a penis plus scrotum.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
No that’s not what I mean. People can be born without ovaries, uterus, vagina (but have a vulva). People can also be born without testes (but have a scrotum and penis). They do not possess these organs, they are nowhere in their bodies. That’s what I was talking about in the very beginning.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
Are you then going to answer my question and tell me what size gamete a body without either ovaries, uterus, and vagina, but a vulva, is “organised” around? Or are you going to shift the goalposts further? First it was “size of gametes”, now its “organised around a size” and I still don’t know what that even means.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
It seems like it.
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
So why’re you trying to put it into such a rigid framework if you agree it’s messy?
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
No ovaries, no uterus, no vagina, just some flabby bits between the legs (that may make tummy feel funny when touched gently) - what size is this body organised around?
- Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs 6 days ago:
You mean well but even in humans it’s not that simple (not to mention non-humans who might produce both sizes or switch). People who are identified as female at birth because they have a vulva may lack ovaries (or even the entire reproductive tract). They don’t have any gametes but because of their outer appearance they’re usually socialised as girls and only notice when they don’t start menstruating at some point. I assume it’s similarly possible to be born with a scrotum (and penis) but no testicles.
- Comment on I'm sick of these asterisk-holes 1 week ago:
Of course I do and the answer is engagement farming.
- Comment on I'm sick of these asterisk-holes 1 week ago:
Oooooh 🤩 now I get it 🥳 haha thank you ❤️❤️❤️
/S
- Comment on I'm sick of these asterisk-holes 1 week ago:
To most people, the core value of a meme is not diminished by a random speck of colour on it. If someone’s found a clever way to express something that I agree strongly with, I don’t give much of a fuck if it says “this motherfucking asshole needs to fucking d*e” or “this motherfucking asshole needs to fucking die”.
- Comment on I'm sick of these asterisk-holes 1 week ago:
In a world where people use AI to generate the stupidest nonsense because they don’t want to bother opening an image editor and “it’s just a meme brah”, you expect people to to hunt down “the original” because someone put a dot on a word to farm outrage engagement?
- Comment on I'm sick of these asterisk-holes 1 week ago:
- The bunny has pancakes on a plate and is eating them.
- Ralph appears and his hand is stretched towards a plate that is in front of the bunny. What’s he doing? The bunny had pancakes in the first panel, that’s where we’ve seen a plate before, must be the same plate, he must be taking the plate (from the bunny’s mouth, no less).
That’s what the order of the panels suggests. It’s bad panelling and the images need to be the other way around. It works in a movie but that’s because we can see the movement.
- Comment on I'm sick of these asterisk-holes 1 week ago:
What is happening here? Is Ralph taking the pancakes away?