To be honest they think that people plan ahead for something like this…
Why do all the new TVs expect me to have a platform AS WIDE as the fucking thing?? Fucking shit!! God awful absolutely dumb thoughtless design choice
Submitted 1 year ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/38022e74-2a15-45f7-9f4c-f909e4358ba7.jpeg
Comments
Ab_intra@lemmy.world 1 year ago
OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And not have the TV hanging out in space to be knocked over.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 year ago
They don’t expect you to have a stand at all. They expect you to buy a separate wall mount piece and mount it directly on the wall.
Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
they expect you to know the lengh of your own table that’s why they put the lengh on the site, also, the legs are already short, how OP expext the TV to be stable with it even shorter??
MossyFeathers@pawb.social 1 year ago
You can make a stable mount without legs as wide as the TV. I have two 27in, 1440p monitors, which both came with stands that were probably 30% as wide as the monitors themselves. However, the stands were weighted and primarily steel (I’m assuming it was steel anyway) with a plastic shell. A TV doesn’t need a wide base unless the company that made it is cheaping out and refuses to spend the money to make a weighted base.
WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 year ago
If my 75" TV can have a small center stand under it there’s no excuse for smaller tvs to have extra wide stands.
WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I will never mount a TV on the wall. That shits annoying.
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 year ago
How is it annoying? I try to wall mount every TV because then I can move it around or angle it easily and it looks 100x better than hanging halfway off a bedside table.
lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I can’t help you but I love this post.
RangerJosie@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Get a universal wall mount.
Carighan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The wider the TV gets, the more stable a two-feet-at-the-ends design becomes compared to a single central foot.
Plus if you need anything else, VESA mounts are super-standard and you just get whatever you need then use it on every Tv you buy.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Have my tv mounted on a VESA monitor arm.
The sloped design made it a bit hard to attach the plate but it worked well enough.
1337@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I have that same TV (50"). They know what they’re doing
- The TV is so flimsy, I don’t trust it with a narrower stand.
- Making a stand like this means the TVs can have the same stand parts for all sizes.
Tygr@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Stand measurements are right on the box! They expect you to read them. 🤣
VulKendov@reddthat.com 1 year ago
Its recommended that the surface that you put your TV on be a couple inches wider than your TV.
Kerrigor@kbin.social 1 year ago
Only because they made the stand that wide 🙄
wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 1 year ago
because the TV is that wide.
not sure what you expect them to do about it.
scarabic@lemmy.world 1 year ago
A wider base footprint is inherently more stable.
electric@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I actually just bought a Sansui TV that almost wouldn’t have fit the desk but it had 2 sets of places where the legs could be attached, so I just attached them to the inner ones. Welcome change. Not sure how uncommon it is since I’ve only owned like 5 TVs and most just had the little circular base in the middle instead.
The legs being so far out is maybe since manufactures found it to be the most stable places for the skinny leg designs they use now. So yeah, cost cutting measure probably.
glimse@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Putting a giant TV on a tiny stand is not normal… Be mildly infuriated at yourself, not the manufacturer
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You should seek a therapist
scarabic@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Or buy a wooden board. People with large TVs can afford a fence board.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Kitty is probably over in !cats being like “mildly infuriating…. Human is ignoring me for a flimsy idiot box…. And it’s meal time!”
DonPiano@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Nah, it’s orange, so it’s probably not thinking at all.
Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Lasagne
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 year ago
that’s so rude. you realize, of course, that orange cats only have one brain cell each, it looks like it’s shared because that cell is quantum entangled with every other orange brain cell. So it’s not that the one cell gets passed around, rather its that all orange cats are thinking the same thought at the same time.
and it’s usually “i’m hungry.”
Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It’s way cheaper to produce such stands (they can be way less sturdy).
Also stop wide-shaming your perfectly nice 32" cat.
DanteFlame@lemmy.sdf.org 6 months ago
They want you to stop being poor and get better furniture if you want a big tv
MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They think everyone wants to mount them to the wall now, the legs are like the cheapest possible “courtesy” they’re willing to include. It’s super annoying, I really don’t want the thing on my wall with a bunch of wires hanging down
siban@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well put cable management pipes under it to hide them
ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 1 year ago
I’d actually love to wall mount but as a renter, not possible.
Currently living with elderly family and she also won’t have a bar of a wall mount.
guacupado@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m curious what picture you saw that made you think the legs would be any different.
Scrof@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
The cat is not impressed, yeah.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 year ago
you bought a cheap TV on black Friday, what did you expect?
IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 1 year ago
Don’t buy TCL if you want a nice stand included.
Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 1 year ago
No idea but cute cat
pipe01@lemmy.pipe01.net 1 year ago
Chill
scytale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Agree. I’m canvassing for a 65” TV and I need to include the entertainment stand in the budget because it won’t fit on the current one I have for my 43”.
Pistcow@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Usually, It’s to distribute the weight. Cheaper brands won’t put the weight in the base needed.my LG oled came with a massive but narrow base. I mounted to the wall with a pull and tilt mount and sold the base on offer up for $50.
Zellith@kbin.social 1 year ago
If feet at the edge of the tv (done for stability) is a stupid design, what would you do differently?
dan1101@lemm.ee 1 year ago
My 2008 Samsung had a great center stand. My new TCL has those little feet. Solution is spend another $30 or so on a center stand.
DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 1 year ago
Everyone’s talking about it being stable, but what’s the benefit in stability from having the legs a couple of inches off the end compared to having them halfway from the center to the end?
I don’t think it would be worse in any way and it would allow the TV’s to stand on smaller surfaces
Mitchie151@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Centre stands need to be way more sturdy to hold it up. You can buy aftermarket VESA centre stands though if you can’t wall mount it.
alvvayson@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This right here.
The TV comes with the cheapest removable feet, because VESA mounts exist.
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
And considering the cost and relative light weight, are more or less a requirement
IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 1 year ago
Yep OP went with a cheap brand, what did he expect.
orphiebaby@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Samsung and everyone else does it too.
vanontom@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Exactly. I think an aftermarket VESA mount is pretty much required these days for modern TVs, that’s the bad news. The good news is that there are plenty of options (center base, wall, swivel, etc), some very affordable, and they should last for multiple TV generations (check VESA pattern, weight limits).
But I get that these tiny, wide feet can be mind boggling at first, since TVs all used to have center stands for decades. Finally, TVs got too large, the cost savings and stability from two tiny feet won out over the alternative of the large, heavy single center base.