Wrong decade bro…
Still hiding today
just sayin
Submitted 3 weeks ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/1d545153-1750-4897-90c2-d78a9ee7da3e.webp
Comments
CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hux@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
ZeroCool@piefed.ca 3 weeks ago
That’s an awesome idea and I’m stealing it! Future me is going to love this, because there’s no way I’m going to remember I set up this reminder.
Greystripeycat@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
Meh. Leaving out the rest of the date. August 29, 1997. Why does everyone worry about the clankers(sarcasm, just in case you’re sensitive) and not about the rich fuckers already controlling everything including those death panels they went on about. I wonder if the clankers would actually be more compassionate than what we have now. I’ll be dead within the decade, doubt I’ll find out.
Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’ve always thought that AI will figure out that the tech bros and Epstein class are morons and take them out. I don’t see how a truly intelligent being can come to any other conclusion
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The problem is that something being highly intelligent or sentient doesn’t mean it will think in the same way as us. The alignment problem isn’t just about trying to make something good instead of evil, but also about trying to make something that shares our idea of how morality works (or that it even exists) in the first place, and that thinks in the same way that we do.
zarathustrad@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Well, it’s a conflation of threats.
It’s not really AI, and it’s not what is in control, but it is enabling the increased consolidation of wealth coupled with the increased ability to defend that wealth with a smaller and smaller concentration of people (surveillance+robotics/drones+LLM aided automation). So, real threats, wrong response as usual.
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
We’ve had this conversation.
Ten years ago I wrote a blog piece about the notion of computers gaining sentience. One of the problems is we don’t actually know how to define or test for sentience (id est, consciousness or self awareness). For most of human history, it was so clear to us whether or not we were engaged with another human being, sentience seemed intuitively obvious.
I get a little into the bushes about qualia (such as the quality of the hue of red rather than it’s composition as #FF0000) but even that concept is functionally shallow, and only serves as a way to differentiate human intelligence from non-human intelligence.
We’ve seen bigots use this kind of notion to argue, say, that Chinese people don’t think the same as western folk, or more recently that neurodivergents don’t think the same way as normal people.
ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Bro, last time I saw the word qualia I was reading James Pustejosvky’s generative lexicon 15 years ago. Yeah I remember arguing with my professor and leaving my masters degree behind…good (?!) Times.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
that neurodivergents don’t think the same way as normal people.
Isn’t that the definition of neurodivergent?
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Coincidentally, I happen to be watching families at play through a chain link fence at the moment.
eurodyne@piefed.world 3 weeks ago
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
How this effect was created before computers is crazy. The movement while disintegrating is so good.
100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
Crispy McConnor
I like my human beings like I like my steaks: charred
DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
1997
Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 3 weeks ago
Geometric rate?
andMoonsValue@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Geometric sequences are real, basically exponential.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
For anyone interested:
save_the_humans@leminal.space 2 weeks ago
Its like exponential, but discrete.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 weeks ago
Squared, cubed… Ya know; geometric shaped multiplication.
Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That was 5 minutes ago. I am not dead yet
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
yet
alekwithak@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Everyone knows Judgement Day was successfully postponed until July 25, 2004.
lagg_mine@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
AI will kill us differently than skynet, its not really the AI, its the capitalism
20cello@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Epstein time
echodot@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Is the nukes come flying in you just shout “is there a seahorse emoji”
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 weeks ago
If Skynet was based on today’s “AI” I don’t know how it would be the same threat. Like bad, sure. But also reaaaaaly dumb at the same time.
Nurgus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Skynet in the films is pretty dumb. It wastes resources in infiltrators who blend in by looking (and talking) like Arnold Schwarzenegger
zarathustrad@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Worked in California.
fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 weeks ago
Like the current US administration
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 weeks ago
Skynet took on the whole world and more or less won, the us can’t beat Iran…
KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 3 weeks ago
And all we get are data centers.
Rooster326@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
At a geometric… rare?
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Pretty common way of expressing exponential growth
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression
metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 3 weeks ago
Except geometric means the exponent is fixed, i.e.
f(x) = x^2
f(x) = x^3
…
f(x) = x^n
where n is a constant, while exponential means the exponent is the variable, like
f(x) = 3^x
meleethecat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
He’s a terminator, not a mathinator.
prettybunnys@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Thank god he wasn’t a burninator
affenlehrer@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
In the German version he tells John and Sarah that his brain is based on a neutral net
kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Aren’t all computers mathinators?
silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk 3 weeks ago
Geometric rate is pretty fast. It doesn’t have to be exponential to be scary.