Feathercrown
@Feathercrown@lemmy.world
- Comment on It's almost here 4 days ago:
Hi, Peter here to explain the meme. In countries with strong weather patterns, the summer months can sometimes reach 100 degrees. By claiming it’s incredibly cold when it is actually still a reasomable summer temperature of 69 degrees (ehehehehe), the poster is eliciting a humor response by pointing out how they perceive the weather as being cold enough for soup (commonly associated with the autumn season) even though it is still a perfectly serviceable summer temperature. Until next time!
- Comment on what are the grievances with the "male loneliness epidemic"? 6 days ago:
It doesn’t help that some people misuse it that way either
- Comment on Coinbase CEO explains why he fired engineers who didn’t try AI immediately 6 days ago:
Because he’s the CEO of Coinbase, what else would you expect someone with that job title to do?
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
I think that argument only really works well if you eliminate gender categories entirely
- Comment on Hollow Knight: Silksong - Special Announcement Stream (starts in 48 hours) 1 week ago:
Suggestion: Walkabout Mini Golf. I was addicted to that thing for weeks
- Comment on Anon thinks there is a bicurious double standard 1 week ago:
Everyone is at least a little jealous, but you can’t remove your partner from the entire populace. Half is a big ask but doable. 100% is just abuse.
The idea that you somehow cannot trust a bi person because they have more potential partners is patently ridiculous. Forbidding your partner from seeing people of an entire gender is similarly ridiculous. I’m not sure what your point is here exactly, but this perspective is certainly sad.
- Comment on Anon thinks there is a bicurious double standard 1 week ago:
Username checks out
- Comment on I could use some serious advice as to whether or not to do this 2 weeks ago:
Yeah IMO more than once would get awkward real fast
- Comment on Worst part about living in Europe 2 weeks ago:
This is why you need aomwthing with tank treads. Like a tank for example
- Comment on Help. 2 weeks ago:
I’m starting to realize how easily fooled people are by this stuff. The average person cannot be this stupid, and yet, they are.
- Comment on Is it safe to assume the guy i went out on a date with, just wants to sleep with me? 3 weeks ago:
(Don’t worry, they weren’t calling you that. It was a commentary on the dating scene.)
- Comment on Is it safe to assume the guy i went out on a date with, just wants to sleep with me? 3 weeks ago:
It’s because nobody on lemmy ever has sex
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
🤝
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
True, I guess immutable wasn’t the right term. It’s mutable, but it’s not really a choice.
I do disagree that banning men is necessarily helpful for the discussion of women’s issues though. Yes, some women’s issues are so far removed from our experience that most male advice wouldn’t be helpful. But I believe there is always value to be found, even-- actually, especially-- from the outgroup. This is the exact rationale for DEI, or at least the one that I find reasonable, which is that having perspectives from people with a wider variety of experiences represented in a space can improve the discussions within it. When done correctly, this improves the experience of the people who the group is “for”. Mixing perspectives with outgroup members like this also improves the mutual understanding between the group’s members and nonmembers, which in this case especially is important. And it allows people to more easily become allies.
What we don’t want is people with a hostile view of the group to be free to participate as much as they want. Maybe banning all men from the community is necessary, or maybe just efficient, to fulfill this purpose. In this case the ban might be worth it, but the loss of external perspectives is a downside and that should be considered here and always.
Like another user replied, there’s a difference between “this isn’t for you” and “you aren’t allowed here”. There aren’t a lot of other public high-quality places to discuss women’s issues, so as a man your options are to:
- Not discuss them, at most trying to understand by watching
- Start your own community for men to discuss women’s issues, which without womens’ perspectives is not likely to go well
- Start a community for all genders to discuss it – maybe I should do this one tbh, although maybe it might be smarter to expand the topic a little
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Very well said
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
You know when conservatives ask why supposedly tolerant groups are actually very intolerant? This is that, but like actually legitimate. It baffles me that these groups can operate like this and not realize the harm they’re doing.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Your example doesn’t really match up because you only mentioned one group and the group shares no logical overlap with the called-out demographic.
I interpreted the original statement as shorthand for white people discriminating against black people and men discriminating against women. Your reading is more grammatically accurate, but less charitable. Given your final paragraph I would encourage you to be more charitable with your interpretations.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
But you continue to reply, so you do have something to add
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Beautiful thank you
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Hey bigbananadealer how much is it for 1 big banana
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
It means that white men have discriminated against them, yes, but it doesn’t rule out the possibility that white women have discriminated against black groups or that black men have discriminated against women groups.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
This is like the least cis dude thing I can think of
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Have a good rest of your day!
I would like to inform you than ending a comment like this to dismiss further discussion as often as you do is not the most healthy or useful practice.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
You added subtext, all they said was…
Determining the meaning from things that aren’t directly stated is LITERALLY what subtext is
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Hello this is the TVA. Your opinion has been displaced from time and must be returned to 1942.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Imagine all the lemmings
Commenting today, oo-ooh-ooh
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
I think if you look above your comment you will find his reasoning
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
We must treat all members of a majority group as oppressors. I am very intelligent.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
I don’t think you interpreted the meaning there correctly
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
They do explicitly allow agender individuals