- as the title indicates, women have been there since the dawn of computing
- computer referred to a person that did calculations, and it was usually a woman.
- is sitting on your ass on a comfortable chair in front of a computer instead of running around caving in skulls really masculine or feminine?
Ada Lovelace
Submitted 2 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/d868a7bf-5f1e-4b7b-a7ef-0991197efd56.jpeg
Comments
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
The origins of computer programming are also intertwined with textiles, as the first punch card programs emerged as part of weaving in the early 1800s (Jacquard looms).
Also interesting: trans people in addition to cis women are historically associated with textile production in many cultures. Trans programmer socks = modern day trans weaver.
xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
IIRC back when “computer” is a person rather than an object, it was a woman’s job.
hexabs@lemmy.world 2 months ago
So it was always an object?
python@lemmy.world 2 months ago
it was OOP even back then
Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 1 month ago
And even when computers started to come around, data entry was still largely female dominated. It wasn’t until late ron that it became a male dominated space. Largely due to the takeover of video games, which were in America heavily marketed towards only boys and not often marketed towards girls.
applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
whats really funny to me is people make this claim, but any good study that looks for differences finds none or that women are very slightly better at math and spatial reasoning
Azzu@leminal.space 2 months ago
Wait you’re telling me that women are better? So that differences between the sexes exist?
sbeak@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
No, the point is that there isn’t, and experiments that do show a slight difference are probably due to experimental error, biases, sampling differences, etc.
Simply being either a man or woman does not make you better than another.
Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Lovelace
On the subject of lace, making it is very intricate and quite mathematical too
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 months ago
I can’t help but feel that we aren’t even close to matching the intelligence of women.
mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Well obviously for you if username checks out…
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 months ago
Hooray for the Lady who might have written the first algorithm! She needs more attention.
Other: Charles Babbage (sp?) and the Analytic Engine: perhaps our first real computer. Imagine a steampunk world where all our devices were powered by huge mechanical chunks and chonks.
I saw a video of a constructed Analytical Engine (they couldn’t manufacture the parts to the specs required in Babbage’s time) donated to a Computer History museum by an early Microsoft exec. Didn’t find it on a quick search, but it’s a huge thing driven by a physical crank.
call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
This woman wrote computer programs before computers existed. Fucking mind-blowing.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 months ago
I can’t imagine a more advanced mind. I mean, maybe Einstein, but we have proof of her discoveries and they’re not at all abstract in the contemporary world! (I mean, they kinda are, but you get what I mean.)
Zerush@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
cockmushroom@reddthat.com 2 months ago
Turns out she even caught the world’s first bug and wrote its second en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Note_G?wprov=sfla1
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 months ago
honestly, drawing patterns only uses “calculus” and “trig” because those are the arbitrary names given to the thought processes that blend the proper melding of mind to motion
sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Isn’t that also true of the word “mathematics” as well?
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 months ago
yep
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Whenever I hear someone slopping that “adage” out, I silently note that they’ve no idea how many of the Apollo astronauts returned home safely. (It rhymes with “female mathematicians”, btw.)
glimse@lemmy.world 2 months ago
(It rhymes with “female mathematicians”, btw.)
…The male mathematicians? Retail statisticians?? Detailed staff positions???
kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
All of them, the answer is all of them. Follow me for more English hacks!
Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 months ago
Been seeing these shorts of a dude who does tie dye shirts, but he does hella math to know how fold the fabric up and get gnarly geometric shapes and mandalas. It’s like damascus steel, but with trippy colors.
fiveze@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I wonder if this is what they were referencing: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-level_task “…the finding that men perform [the water-level task] at a higher level has been robustly confirmed.”
HereIAm@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I assume for the college level students it’s who can mark the level of the water most accurately? I certainly hope all of them would at least mark the water line horizontal to the ground
burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 2 months ago
I love these pseudo intelectual arguments that try to explain human behavior. It’s a fact that there are biological differences between men and women, that is obvious. But people love to pull sophisticated pseudo scientific arguments that rest in very weak premises, which often ignore the many other factors (for example social and political) that also influence the outcome this argument is trying to explain.
So, this women are bad at spatial awareness so they are bad at math. How do we objectively validate the premise in the first place, without taking into account biases that can influence that very premise, like social, nutritional and political factors? Are math skills only influenced by spatial awareness or are there other factors that influence math skills?
So this argument is actually a subjective prejudice but worded in a way that seems to be scientifically valid. One consequence of the enlightenment is that we started to try all the time to disguise a subjective prejudice with an objective truth. After that we had eugenics, (pseudo-) scientific race theory and all kinds bad justifications, but the truth is that people want to exploit other people, and they think that coming up with moral and scientific explanations for this exploitation makes them sleep better after making numerous atrocities during the day.
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 months ago
The intent of the post, sure. Women and men are equally capable of anything.
But absolutely nobody creating sewing patterns is sitting down and going “alright the integral of e to the x dx is…” Or remembering their laplace transformations.
Melobol@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
I love over-complicating things… but Calculus in a sewing pattern sounds really strange.
Unless… it is like for a space suit where you need to be accurate? Or making something for a form fitting hard surface?
Wren@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Quilters would like a word.
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Only if you want clothes that fit
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
I imagine people are using the calculus to analyze knitting patterns and stuff. Not the knitters themselves.
Fondots@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Fun fact, the space suits used in the Apollo program were made by Playtex
DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Well there is a lot of calculus involved in making patterns like body ratios or wool to knot ratios if you put knitting into sewing.
pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I’m not saying I couldn’t see cases where I would seriously consider using calculus in a sewing pattern, but it’s really not used in sewing pattern creation basically ever unless someone already knows it and had a very specific use case. I suspect the OP meant “calculations” or something similar and mis-typed.
Source: I still remember a fair amount of calculus and I sew
Seleni@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Of course they don’t mean women pull out a calculator, a notebook, and start doing calculations, anymore than when a person throws a ball at a target they pull out some graph paper and start calculating parabolic arcs and all that shit. They’re saying we do it instinctively, and if we’re good at doing it instinctively then we can do it intellectually.
Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 2 months ago
Do you think “mental calculus” means people are doing derivatives in their heads?
It doesn’t. It’s also not what was meant by the author of this post when they used the word.