Original article: nvidia.com/…/dlss5-breakthrough-in-visual-fidelit…
Fixed it.
Submitted 2 weeks ago by pewpew@feddit.it to [deleted]
https://feddit.it/pictrs/image/ad017607-ee75-4055-a831-280378b23f56.png
Comments
NONE_dc@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
krisevol@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
No way. Nvidia is currently the only gpu that do utilize 1440p 500hz oled monitors. Dlss4. 5 is a have charger for high refresh gaming.
daannii@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Guess they didn’t realize games have an art style.
Tampering with that by making all games look the same is destructive to the graphic art style.
Booo It’s bad Boooooo
Epp@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
It’s like putting ketchup on a hamburger! If the chef wanted you to have ketchup, he would have put it on their himself. You’re spitting in his face by making changes to accommodate your personal preferences. One size fits all!
daannii@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think it’s a bit different.
It’s more like changing a human made painting with AI to make the person look like modern IG “models”.
I think it’s fine to add condiments to food. That’s not really the same as painting over real human art , with AI slop.
MBech@feddit.dk 2 weeks ago
That’s like saying “you shouldn’t mod games, 'cause that’s not what the dev intended”. Idgaf what the dev/chef intended, if I like mods in my burger, I’m gonna season it to my liking.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It reminds me more of that old meme of “if Mona Lisa was painted today”.
KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 weeks ago
For realistic maybe but every style would need its own models and parameters to work well, seems like one thing more that will only fit for one flagship game and then realistically not used ever again
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
As an embedded systems engineer, I find VLSI shaders to be a fantastic technology.
Simultaneously, AI code overall is absolute fucking trash.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I hate how bad NVIDIA has to be in general, because DLSS is legitimately amazing technology. Even the frame gen in DLSS 4 that was pretty rough at first is shockingly good in Borderlands 4 for example. Too bad they’re the reason no one can buy RAM
mr_eckneim@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Looks like they trained their stuff on instagram posts tbh
daggermoon@piefed.world 2 weeks ago
It looks like dog shit lmao
papalonian@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Eh, the examples shown imo were 50/50 improvements vs downgrades. First few were good, couple looked really bad, then a few good ones again. I suppose it’s subjective. As long as it’s just an option that can be turned off I don’t think it’s that bad.
Sl00k@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
I personally think these looked really good IDK why it’s getting so much hate other than “ai bad” complaints
dellhiver@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Was watching the Digital Foundry review of this tech. They seemed impressed, the people in the comments were scathing
Everyday I think things can’t get worse. That maybe this will be the breaking point. But no.
The main Resident Evil example is just awful. It’s like an Instagram filter.
It’s worse than that guy who has been going around photoshopping “Ugly” female game characters to make them look hotter.
I hate this reality.
mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t forget that when Sony went back and did the HD remaster, they actually remodeled her that way.
All of the worst people are winning.
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Jesus Christ
defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip 2 weeks ago
Well at least the photoshopping is done by a human.
hedge_lord@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It is too… clean? The lighting is too “perfect”. Each object is an idea rather than an image to be interpreted. It conforms to what instagram considers to be realistic.
This is a mirror of human delusion averaged and contorted to gaze into itself, and as such I abhor it.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
This video has a neat fhowcase of what’s going on here. So-called “AI” adds detail where there should be none, which makes the faces look like worn-out, but polished leather.
YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The examples they’ve shown are so static, I really want to see how the ‘invented details’ warp or phase in and out on fast motion scenes.
purrtastic@lemmy.nz 2 weeks ago
Digital Foundry are gushing over how amazing this is. digitalfoundry.net/…/nvidias-new-dlss-5-brings-ph…
pewpew@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
Yeah sure it looks more “real” but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.
I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
How is the removal of shadows considered to be better lighting in any way?
StellarSt0rm@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yeah i was thinking that, using the comparison tool i was able to see it better and it completely ruined the atmosphere in the first image. The image without DLSS5 looks darker and personally i think it looks better like that, DLSS5 then just completely removes that darkness and makes it look awful.
idealotus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Ehhhh. I saw the text (“The Real Deal” poster on the window in one comparison). There’s still some artifacting, which to me is a deal breaker, especially if I have to DLSS everything instead of selected items.
But I’m also not a game developer, so I don’t know if the modeling differences are worth the tradeoff for something that most people won’t see in motion.
merdaverse@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Now with its own dedicated hardware: the SPU (Slop Processing Unit)
pewpew@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
Apparently you need a second RTX 5090 dedicated just to slopification duty
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
And I am fascinated by the number of people who, after all those years, still have no idea how DLSS and neural networks work.
gegil@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
I knew that nvidia will at some point make graphics fully ai generated, skipping the rendering.
pewpew@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
This is not the case… yet.
Some companies already tried this multiple times in the last two years, the future of gaming is looking bright
altphoto@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Also, twenty feathers and twenty pounds of bricks both weigh twenty pounds.
Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I would try to interpolate your probably real question here, too. And I’m no AI. Unless I missed your point
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 2 weeks ago
No thx. I’m not too big on the last few generations of gaming anyway but if they’re really going to push their slop like this I’m out fully.
krisevol@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
I actually love DLSS 4.5. no other method or gpu can do 1440p 500fps to run my oled monitor, but DLSS4. 5 can and it runs and plays amazing. I won’t go back to 144hz just to play native if i have a choice to do 500fps dlss.
Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I want to see what this wold look like applied to a character editor but then I never want to see it again.
BiomedOtaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Where can I post this ? Seriously I would love nvidia to see this.
vinyl@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
In that comparison pic, the lighting is so off, like with the ai version instantly theres a couple different light sources that illuminate the characters face
Epp@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
You’re so clever. This post is a much bigger accomplishment than adding optional features to hardware. Bravo! Encore!
Do GMOs next. Point out that cultivating traits in bio organics is simply “slop food.” That’ll make them think twice!
faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
Image