Original article: nvidia.com/…/dlss5-breakthrough-in-visual-fidelit…
Looks like they trained their stuff on instagram posts tbh
Fixed it.
Submitted 13 hours ago by pewpew@feddit.it to [deleted]
https://feddit.it/pictrs/image/ad017607-ee75-4055-a831-280378b23f56.png
Comments
mr_eckneim@feddit.org 3 hours ago
faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 10 hours ago
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
And I am fascinated by the number of people who, after all those years, still have no idea how DLSS and neural networks work.
daannii@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Guess they didn’t realize games have an art style.
Tampering with that by making all games look the same is destructive to the graphic art style.
Booo It’s bad Boooooo
Epp@lemmus.org 8 hours ago
It’s like putting ketchup on a hamburger! If the chef wanted you to have ketchup, he would have put it on their himself. You’re spitting in his face by making changes to accommodate your personal preferences. One size fits all!
daannii@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
I think it’s a bit different.
It’s more like changing a human made painting with AI to make the person look like modern IG “models”.
I think it’s fine to add condiments to food. That’s not really the same as painting over real human art , with AI slop.
MBech@feddit.dk 2 hours ago
That’s like saying “you shouldn’t mod games, 'cause that’s not what the dev intended”. Idgaf what the dev/chef intended, if I like mods in my burger, I’m gonna season it to my liking.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
It reminds me more of that old meme of “if Mona Lisa was painted today”.
hedge_lord@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
It is too… clean? The lighting is too “perfect”. Each object is an idea rather than an image to be interpreted. It conforms to what instagram considers to be realistic.
This is a mirror of human delusion averaged and contorted to gaze into itself, and as such I abhor it.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 hours ago
This video has a neat fhowcase of what’s going on here. So-called “AI” adds detail where there should be none, which makes the faces look like worn-out, but polished leather.
NONE_dc@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
gegil@sopuli.xyz 3 hours ago
I knew that nvidia will at some point make graphics fully ai generated, skipping the rendering.
pewpew@feddit.it 1 hour ago
This is not the case… yet.
Some companies already tried this multiple times in the last two years, the future of gaming is looking bright
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
As an embedded systems engineer, I find VLSI shaders to be a fantastic technology.
Simultaneously, AI code overall is absolute fucking trash.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
I hate how bad NVIDIA has to be in general, because DLSS is legitimately amazing technology. Even the frame gen in DLSS 4 that was pretty rough at first is shockingly good in Borderlands 4 for example. Too bad they’re the reason no one can buy RAM
dellhiver@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
Was watching the Digital Foundry review of this tech. They seemed impressed, the people in the comments were scathing
Everyday I think things can’t get worse. That maybe this will be the breaking point. But no.
The main Resident Evil example is just awful. It’s like an Instagram filter.
It’s worse than that guy who has been going around photoshopping “Ugly” female game characters to make them look hotter.
I hate this reality.
mycodesucks@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Don’t forget that when Sony went back and did the HD remaster, they actually remodeled her that way.
All of the worst people are winning.
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
Jesus Christ
defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip 12 hours ago
Well at least the photoshopping is done by a human.
purrtastic@lemmy.nz 9 hours ago
Digital Foundry are gushing over how amazing this is. digitalfoundry.net/…/nvidias-new-dlss-5-brings-ph…
pewpew@feddit.it 1 hour ago
Yeah sure it looks more “real” but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.
I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 hours ago
How is the removal of shadows considered to be better lighting in any way?
idealotus@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Ehhhh. I saw the text (“The Real Deal” poster on the window in one comparison). There’s still some artifacting, which to me is a deal breaker, especially if I have to DLSS everything instead of selected items.
But I’m also not a game developer, so I don’t know if the modeling differences are worth the tradeoff for something that most people won’t see in motion.
daggermoon@piefed.world 12 hours ago
It looks like dog shit lmao
papalonian@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Eh, the examples shown imo were 50/50 improvements vs downgrades. First few were good, couple looked really bad, then a few good ones again. I suppose it’s subjective. As long as it’s just an option that can be turned off I don’t think it’s that bad.
Sl00k@programming.dev 7 hours ago
I personally think these looked really good IDK why it’s getting so much hate other than “ai bad” complaints
Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
I want to see what this wold look like applied to a character editor but then I never want to see it again.
altphoto@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
chaogomu@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Also, twenty feathers and twenty pounds of bricks both weigh twenty pounds.
Epp@lemmus.org 8 hours ago
You’re so clever. This post is a much bigger accomplishment than adding optional features to hardware. Bravo! Encore!
Do GMOs next. Point out that cultivating traits in bio organics is simply “slop food.” That’ll make them think twice!
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 49 minutes ago
No thx. I’m not too big on the last few generations of gaming anyway but if they’re really going to push their slop like this I’m out fully.