Currently, only GOG and Itch are still selling this game.
Steam was the first major storefront to refuse to carry Horses, a first-person psychological horror adventure about “the burden of familial trauma and puritan values, the dynamics of totalitarian power, and the ethics of personal responsibility” set on a ranch where nude human beings in horse masks are treated as livestock.
Publisher Santa Ragione said in November that Valve declined to carry Horses because it contained “content that appears, in our judgment, to depict sexual conduct involving a minor.” Santa Ragione disputed that characterization, but an appeal was rejected and the ban stands.
Seems like it’s treading a very fine line…
Kraiden@piefed.social 19 hours ago
I’m assuming they don’t mean a suggestive camera pan, but actually something problematic on screen, in which case, I totally support the ban. Devs were given the opportunity to change it, and they said no. Ban away imho. The fact that this is considered controversial is pretty disturbing to me.
markz@suppo.fi 18 hours ago
It was a child doing pony play, riding a naked adult man-horse. The dev claimed it was not sexual.
This was removed later but it’s the build you send for review that gets reviewed. Other stores got a later version, hence why it passed on those.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 31 minutes ago
Considering there website proudly shows it is banned on Steam I’m sure this was done on purpose for the publicity.
Why did Epic ban it though? They didn’t get the ‘tainted’ preview version and normally love to have games that aren’t on Steam.
cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 18 hours ago
I haven’t heard about the details, what’s your source on that?
As far as I recall, the developer said he didn’t know the actual reason for the ban.
dukemirage@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
What’s CSAM?
REDACTED@infosec.pub 13 hours ago
I’m almost thru the game and I did not notice any sexual conducts with minors
Kraiden@piefed.social 13 hours ago
Yep, I’ve since read some other articles and it seems there’s more to this specific case
Deestan@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
The devs were not told what needed to change even after asking, so they tried to remove anything that they suspected could be taken the wrong way, asked for reconsideration or clarification, but receive none.
KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
This is false.
eurogamer.net/its-extremely-frustrating-and-also-…
They submitted to steam, who asked for a preliminary build of the game (one would assume due to concerns about the content). The build provided included a small child reading a naked man like a horse.
Steam denied the game based on the inclusion of CSAM, and advised the devs directly of this decision in what the devs call “an automated email”, as if steam is out there personally hand writing rejection letters for every failed game out there.
The devs claim to have changed the scene, but it seems that Steam has a zero-tolerance policy on games that feature CSAM. And, I mean, Fair.
Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
Forming an opinion from your made up justification is a sign of poor judgement
Kraiden@piefed.social 18 hours ago
It’s a direct quote from the article you’re commenting on, and that my opinion is based on.
But please, don’t let me stop you from attacking my character instead of my argument