Damn I wanna know this guy’s secret!
the fuckgraph
Submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/3f03f485-5905-4dce-84e2-ff69ab222098.webp
Comments
Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 2 years ago
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I was just about to point that out!
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 2 years ago
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
Alpha male
PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 years ago
A striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.
essteeyou@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Would you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?
mkhopper@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Depends on which hand you use.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 years ago
The lines are relations. The dots are people.
Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
Surprisingly few gay relationships
nomnomdeplume@lemmy.world 2 years ago
It’s the midwest, so probably a lot in hiding
768@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
1993-1995 as well.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 years ago
I am only seeing one!
Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
Nah there’s two, one male one female
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 years ago
That one circular chain of people who seemed mostly to agree of having either two gfs or two bfs and never crossing another person in the chain…
mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 years ago
I kept looking at that too. It's crazy to me that there are only 2 cycles in the graph. It honestly makes me think that either something must be wrong with the data, or it's reflective of some deep principle of math or sexuality (e.g. that people won't fuck around within their close social grouping nearly as readily as they will with people on the outskirts of it).
jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 2 years ago
The authors wrote that they were surprised too and went back to talk to the students and apparently there was an unwritten rule that you don’t date the ex of the new partner of your ex. So if Bob and Alice split up and Alice starts dating Ben, then Bob should not date Ben’s ex Alison.
Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Also feels weird there’s only one same gender connection (female to female) as far as I could see in that whole thing…
Liz@midwest.social 2 years ago
I’ve spotted five cycles.
- The big boy.
- Six member cycle at the top of the big boy.
- Four member cycle with that guy who slept with nine girls.
- A second cycle with that same guy.
- That three way over to the right.
It’s possible there’s more but I’m pretty sure that’s it.
nbafantest@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I find that extremely unlikely to occur. There’s just no way it’s a single link circle.
muzzle@lemm.ee 2 years ago
That circle is just the scientific representation of the old Tom Leherer song!
Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 years ago
There are 6 people who’ve had gay sex that I could find and all but one of them are bi (or at least bi-curious). That seems like a statistical anomaly.
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 years ago
It’s a 90s high school, somewhat rural and religious, according to the article. Either there really were few homosexual relationships there, or the students didn’t want to reveal them.
flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
You think?
I think people feel liberated to say they’re gay these days, so there are much more people claiming to be gay than in previous decades. On the other hand, there’s still a lot of homophobes and also quite some biphobes around, so there’s probably a lot of bi people that present as hetero or even gay.
I’d assume that most people are at least a little bi, and that they’ll try that out in high school even if they later decide they won’t pursue it.
jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 years ago
Not long ago I saw a woman’s profile on tinder in NYC that said “No bi men”. I guess it’s good that she put her phobia right out front like that.
essteeyou@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I’m surprised to see that a few people have had 5 or 6 sexual partners while in high school.
TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 years ago
…within the previous 6 months.
EfreetSK@lemmy.world 2 years ago
This is actually very interresting. I always found it hard to understand how some people can have so many sexual partners, and then there are people with very few of sexual partners. I had this theory that there must be some subculture of people who are really into this, date eachother in this group which causes their number to increase abnormally. It was just a silly theory but this sort of supports it?
ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
If you look at this a little closer, you’ll notice that there aren’t actually that many highly connected nodes.
The big structure is mostly composed of single link chains.EfreetSK@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Hmm you’re right, I thought the big circle was more interconnected. Actually it’s a bit weird that there are basically no crossing lines
petersr@lemmy.world 2 years ago
And that’s even more interesting. As someone who was not part of any of the graph in high school / college, how would a big link of chains play out in real time?
Like “The Mary and Tom met at a party. Next week Tom stumbled into Lucy by the lockers…”
I find it hard to imagine.
rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 years ago
I wonder how many lied
essteeyou@lemmy.world 2 years ago
They’d have to lie about who they slept with, and I expect the other person might have something to say about that if it was not true.
I wonder if they verified each claim from both sides.
ICastFist@programming.dev 2 years ago
whether or not the nomination from i to j was reciprocated with a nomination from j to i.
Oh, so there was no bullshit filter
mmuser@lemmy.world 2 years ago
ience_memes@mander.xyz-10839295 They live in their own world…
Freeman@feddit.de 2 years ago
There are 63 dedicated couples, nothing more
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 years ago
Wow, that’s literally not me.
TheOakTree@beehaw.org 2 years ago
The one guy who got with 9 people… is he a liar or a rizzler?
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
I imagine they has to be confirmed from both sides…
jabrd@hexbear.net 2 years ago
There is not nearly as much gay sex on this chart as I would’ve guessed. Just the one bi girl hookup in the second from the right tree at the top. Actually is that a threesome or do you think they just all screwed at different points in time?
aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 2 years ago
Well it is a 20 year old study. Attitudes towards LGBT people were much less accepting back then
Liz@midwest.social 2 years ago
The relationships were from the early 90s. Everyone in the graph is in their 50s or close to it. So everything you said about attitudes is probably just more true.
Lucien@hexbear.net 2 years ago
Why is one ring of the fuckgraph shaped like a prolapsed anus?
sourquincelog@hexbear.net 2 years ago
If you mean top right, it seems like that’s the #1 pussy getter
Lucien@hexbear.net 2 years ago
Being the Midwest, that’s the quarterback for sure
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 years ago
some of the subtrees here made me say “wtf is going on here”
mvirts@lemmy.world 2 years ago
A missed opportunity to arrange the graph in an artistic fashion. 😹
muzzle@lemm.ee 2 years ago
That paper is the scientific version of the old Tom Leherer song!
Infamousblt@hexbear.net 2 years ago
This looks similar to my polycule diagram tbh
768@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
Did you do the first pic, fossilisque?
fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 years ago
Nah, that was college lmao
768@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
Joker… no, I meant the fuckgraph text
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 years ago
For anyone who can’t find them… :D
Image
jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
It’s like the Where’s Waldo of gay sex.
TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 years ago
It’s interesting that only one out of the lot of them was (at least within the last 6 months) gay. All the rest with same-sex relations were bisexual (at least within the last 6 months).
Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 years ago
I might be explained by the fact that it’s a lot harder to find a partner if you are gay and most of them outsource their search