Damn I wanna know this guy’s secret!
the fuckgraph
Submitted 10 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/3f03f485-5905-4dce-84e2-ff69ab222098.webp
Comments
Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 10 months ago
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I was just about to point that out!
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Alpha male
PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 months ago
A striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.
essteeyou@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Would you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?
mkhopper@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Depends on which hand you use.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 10 months ago
The lines are relations. The dots are people.
Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Surprisingly few gay relationships
nomnomdeplume@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s the midwest, so probably a lot in hiding
768@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
1993-1995 as well.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
I am only seeing one!
Scubus@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Nah there’s two, one male one female
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
That one circular chain of people who seemed mostly to agree of having either two gfs or two bfs and never crossing another person in the chain…
mozz@mbin.grits.dev 10 months ago
I kept looking at that too. It's crazy to me that there are only 2 cycles in the graph. It honestly makes me think that either something must be wrong with the data, or it's reflective of some deep principle of math or sexuality (e.g. that people won't fuck around within their close social grouping nearly as readily as they will with people on the outskirts of it).
jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
The authors wrote that they were surprised too and went back to talk to the students and apparently there was an unwritten rule that you don’t date the ex of the new partner of your ex. So if Bob and Alice split up and Alice starts dating Ben, then Bob should not date Ben’s ex Alison.
Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Also feels weird there’s only one same gender connection (female to female) as far as I could see in that whole thing…
Liz@midwest.social 10 months ago
I’ve spotted five cycles.
- The big boy.
- Six member cycle at the top of the big boy.
- Four member cycle with that guy who slept with nine girls.
- A second cycle with that same guy.
- That three way over to the right.
It’s possible there’s more but I’m pretty sure that’s it.
nbafantest@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I find that extremely unlikely to occur. There’s just no way it’s a single link circle.
muzzle@lemm.ee 10 months ago
That circle is just the scientific representation of the old Tom Leherer song!
Schmoo@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
There are 6 people who’ve had gay sex that I could find and all but one of them are bi (or at least bi-curious). That seems like a statistical anomaly.
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
It’s a 90s high school, somewhat rural and religious, according to the article. Either there really were few homosexual relationships there, or the students didn’t want to reveal them.
flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
You think?
I think people feel liberated to say they’re gay these days, so there are much more people claiming to be gay than in previous decades. On the other hand, there’s still a lot of homophobes and also quite some biphobes around, so there’s probably a lot of bi people that present as hetero or even gay.
I’d assume that most people are at least a little bi, and that they’ll try that out in high school even if they later decide they won’t pursue it.
jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 months ago
Not long ago I saw a woman’s profile on tinder in NYC that said “No bi men”. I guess it’s good that she put her phobia right out front like that.
essteeyou@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m surprised to see that a few people have had 5 or 6 sexual partners while in high school.
TheDoozer@lemmy.world 10 months ago
…within the previous 6 months.
EfreetSK@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This is actually very interresting. I always found it hard to understand how some people can have so many sexual partners, and then there are people with very few of sexual partners. I had this theory that there must be some subculture of people who are really into this, date eachother in this group which causes their number to increase abnormally. It was just a silly theory but this sort of supports it?
ricecake@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
If you look at this a little closer, you’ll notice that there aren’t actually that many highly connected nodes.
The big structure is mostly composed of single link chains.EfreetSK@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Hmm you’re right, I thought the big circle was more interconnected. Actually it’s a bit weird that there are basically no crossing lines
petersr@lemmy.world 10 months ago
And that’s even more interesting. As someone who was not part of any of the graph in high school / college, how would a big link of chains play out in real time?
Like “The Mary and Tom met at a party. Next week Tom stumbled into Lucy by the lockers…”
I find it hard to imagine.
rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
I wonder how many lied
essteeyou@lemmy.world 10 months ago
They’d have to lie about who they slept with, and I expect the other person might have something to say about that if it was not true.
I wonder if they verified each claim from both sides.
ICastFist@programming.dev 10 months ago
whether or not the nomination from i to j was reciprocated with a nomination from j to i.
Oh, so there was no bullshit filter
mmuser@lemmy.world 10 months ago
ience_memes@mander.xyz-10839295 They live in their own world…
Freeman@feddit.de 10 months ago
There are 63 dedicated couples, nothing more
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Wow, that’s literally not me.
TheOakTree@beehaw.org 10 months ago
The one guy who got with 9 people… is he a liar or a rizzler?
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
I imagine they has to be confirmed from both sides…
jabrd@hexbear.net 10 months ago
There is not nearly as much gay sex on this chart as I would’ve guessed. Just the one bi girl hookup in the second from the right tree at the top. Actually is that a threesome or do you think they just all screwed at different points in time?
aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Well it is a 20 year old study. Attitudes towards LGBT people were much less accepting back then
Liz@midwest.social 10 months ago
The relationships were from the early 90s. Everyone in the graph is in their 50s or close to it. So everything you said about attitudes is probably just more true.
Lucien@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Why is one ring of the fuckgraph shaped like a prolapsed anus?
sourquincelog@hexbear.net 10 months ago
If you mean top right, it seems like that’s the #1 pussy getter
Lucien@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Being the Midwest, that’s the quarterback for sure
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 10 months ago
some of the subtrees here made me say “wtf is going on here”
mvirts@lemmy.world 10 months ago
A missed opportunity to arrange the graph in an artistic fashion. 😹
muzzle@lemm.ee 10 months ago
That paper is the scientific version of the old Tom Leherer song!
Infamousblt@hexbear.net 10 months ago
This looks similar to my polycule diagram tbh
768@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Did you do the first pic, fossilisque?
fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Nah, that was college lmao
768@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Joker… no, I meant the fuckgraph text
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
For anyone who can’t find them… :D
Image
jballs@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
It’s like the Where’s Waldo of gay sex.
TheDoozer@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s interesting that only one out of the lot of them was (at least within the last 6 months) gay. All the rest with same-sex relations were bisexual (at least within the last 6 months).
Mubelotix@jlai.lu 10 months ago
I might be explained by the fact that it’s a lot harder to find a partner if you are gay and most of them outsource their search