I wish I had $66k. Could squash my wife’s student loans with that.
It's great to see a politician that's progressive and Not a Millionaire.
Submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to workreform@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/05499a1b-1aad-45c1-b98b-743af88fed5d.png
Comments
tanisnikana@lemmy.world 1 month ago
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 1 month ago
AOC has argued for student loan cancellation for all and free college education for all. She and Bernie Sanders have put forth proposals to do just that. They’re just fighting an uphill battle.
Mac@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Didn’t Biden start implememting that? Or am i misremembering
tanisnikana@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I hope she gets that golden email, I really do.
nonentity@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.
Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.
Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“Financial Obesity” should be more of a common term when talking about those who should have a date with a guillotine.
I approve
nonentity@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
A blunt edge with guardrails at 9.8m•s^-2^.
BillyClark@piefed.social 1 month ago
I seem to recall this was from a few years ago. At this point, I wouldn’t hold it against her if she’s made more money. Big name politicians can make extra money through things like speaking fees and book deals. Honestly, I’d be surprised if any famous politicians aren’t taking speaking fees. Plus, her salary is $174,000/year according to Wikipedia.
I like to at least pretend in my head that I’d be an ethical politician were I ever elected (a job I would never actually want), and if somebody offered me a speaking fee that was sort of the average amount a politician might get, I think I’d still be able to convince myself it wasn’t a bribe.
The_v@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Most elected positions don’t pay enough in the U.S. today. This is expecially true in state legislature where most politicians start before attempting a national run. The only people who can afford to run for underpaid positions are either independently wealthy or corrupt. For example let’s look at some of the most corrupt states in the U.S.
Texas - state senators & representatives $7,200 salary and $221/per diem when in session.
Louisiana- senator and representatives $16,800 + $178/per diem and $6000 slush fund.
Utah - state senators and representatives $0 salary and $301/per diem.
Nevada - State senators and representatives $0 salary and $130/per diem.
This lack of pay for positions is deliberate to keep “working class” out of government. It lead to open corruption and conflict of interest being normalized.
Eldritch@piefed.world 1 month ago
Initially politician wasn’t supposed to be a career. It was a side hustle you did after planting and after harvest. Which exains some of the session schedules you see today that seem odd.
I’d argue that we need to get these offices back to being what you do outside your day job again. Whatever that means in modern society. However, if were going to make the mistake of letting it remain a career path. We do need to pay accordingly. While codifying actual laws against graft. Not just unenforceable “norms”.
chisel@piefed.social 1 month ago
And then they like to put up measures to increase their salary from $5k to $25k, as if that’ll let your average Joe run and isn’t just a handout to the already wealthy scum currently in office. Bonus points when they also try to increase the term limit at the same time.
onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah I remember during one of Bernie’s presidential runs it was some sort of “gotcha” from the right that he made about $1M in a year. Like… okay? He’d be pretty fucking dumb if he didn’t make that at a bare minimum from his popularity.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
She’s one book deal away from joining Obama on Martha’s Vineyard
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Anyone have a link to the actual disclosure document? This doesn’t seem to pass the smell test. She’s making a salary of $174k per year and has been in Congress for 7 years. I wonder if this excludes retirement accounts like 401ks and IRAs. That would make sense. But I would expect her to have at least $100k in a retirement account by now. I mean she did go from working as a bartender to being a member of Congress. That kind of jump in pay usually lets one really up their retirement savings at least.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
She needs to keep a home in both DC and NYC, two of the most expensive cities for housing. That will eat up a LOT of income. She also has student loans to pay.
She has a relatively high paying job, and this is as far as she’s gotten. Imagine the average college graduate, who is probably making far less that $100k annually.
Student loans are crushing our economy, and thousands more students graduate every year with the same millstone around their necks, and our children economy. It is a National Security Threat that will only grow worse with time. Student loan debt makes EVERYONE susceptible to bribes, espionage, and corruption.
beastrabban@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Are 401ks subject to disclosure? Also, 175k isn’t that much when you live in DC. I know that’s a joke to a lot of people, but DC is crazy expensive.
Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“She doesn’t have the mountain of ill-gotten personal wealth required to understand the commoners and their struggles.”
taiyang@lemmy.world 1 month ago
She… she has 66k in bank accounts? I hope they’re at least in CDs or high yield savings; although I guess she gets a pension.
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
CDs? Compact discs?
limelight79@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Certificate of Deposit, a type of savings account that generates higher interest than a regular savings account.
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Speaking of wealth and politicians, by the time Trump’s tax records were finally released after years of court battles, the public had moved on to other things and paid virtually no attention to the masses of inconsistencies - which would be prosecuted as tax fraud if other people did them.
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
She’s not perfect, but she is at least coming from a place where she is aware of the challenges facing regular people. If everyone in congress was like that we’d be in a much better situation.
SoloCritical@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Just imagine how much more money she could have if she just took AIPAC money!
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Or did obscene insider trading like Dan Crenshaw, who took office the same year.
manxu@piefed.social 1 month ago
Sooo… Big fan of AOC and Hogg, but the original tweet (I know, I am showing my age here) doesn’t value-judge the holdings, just lists them.
I would have been horrified if she’d had the numbers of a Mitch McConnell or Nancy Pelosi. The current Congress and Administration show very clearly why having people with lots of money run the country is a terrible idea.
luokaton@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
maybe the response was addressing comments to, and not the original tweet?
manxu@piefed.social 1 month ago
Fair enough
Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I certainly hope AOC continues to work for the people and not turn into a greedy bastard.
bdb@lemmy.4d2.org 1 month ago
But still votes to arm Israel
flandish@lemmy.world 1 month ago
she’s a good start, would get there if she would please come out against israel’s genocide. probably career suicide but…
gotta look again to see if she’s come out anti israel. if so, she’s got my votes.
vairse@lemmy.world 1 month ago
She’s against funding Israel nbcnews.com/…/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-will-now-o…
flandish@lemmy.world 1 month ago
win!
tanisnikana@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Also did you get your phone out of the toilet yet? Should prolly do that soon.
Avicenna@programming.dev 1 month ago
Actually some idiot previously made fun of her for just this. Some people really deserve to be fiddled by daddy Trump all their life
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
MAGA wants it both ways. On one hand, they want to accuse her of being a corrupt millionaire, but when she proves that’s a lie, they make fun of her for not making more money.
LavenderBreton@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
You don’t mean the sexual way, right? No one deserves that, regardless of political views.
Avicenna@programming.dev 1 month ago
We are not talking about just voting for Trump though this is someone who made fun of a politician for not being rich. I won’t have any sympathy for such a person. Nevertheless my original intention was the British slang usage of the word, i.e trick someone to get money. But I am also ok if they get groped by him occasionally.
SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 1 month ago
If you believe that I would like to invite you to go watch some pro wrestling with me.
Zacryon@feddit.org 1 month ago
I think a society should be judged by its “lowest” members. If those are living well, everyone else will likely live a good life as well.
Might get there faster if politicians would have to live on minimum wage alone.
InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
I have 0.000000% issue with elected officials at the federal level having investments in the stock market.
So long as it’s done in a way that can reasonably guarantee they aren’t manipulating the market, doing insider trading, etc. This includes things like investing in mutual funds (with caveats obviously) amongst other options from publicly accessible financial services firm.
ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I am pretty confident there’s no such guarantee. Source: the last 250 years of American politics.
InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
I am pretty confident that there’s no way you read “reasonably guarantee” and understood it correctly.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They made Jimmy Carter give up his peanut farm.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Nobody made him, he felt it was the ethical thing to do. He gave the money to a third party to invest, and they botched it. When he left the presidency, he found out he was nearly bankrupt.
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
No, I disagree. Elected officials shouldn’t have investments in stocks at all, period. Nor should they be multimillionnaires or richer.
InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Fascinating. How do you envision that working? And what do you currently do to support this being a possibility?
whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
disclosed
Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You don’t think Trump’s SS cronies are looking for any and all reasons to off her? Tax evasion or financial fraud would be fucking PERFECT for them to get rid of her
whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I’ll have you know I quite like AOC but she’s still a politician and she sure as shit isn’t dumb. She has money somewhere she would be stupid not to. To be clear this is also not a bad thing. I would expect her to have money she’s been in politics long enough.
rayyy@piefed.social 1 month ago
The Republican and Democratic parties have placed targets on AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani because they aren’t on the oligarchs side.
leavemealone@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
" these dead shall have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom to oppress the people—and that government of the oligarchs, by the oligarchs, for the oligarchs, shall not perish from the earth."
Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Indeed and there are plenty of ill informed dumbshits that will vote against her.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 weeks ago
And the rest of us are on their side, and it’s time to start throwing our weight around.
It starts with elections. The only reason the Establishment guys are paying attention is because the DemSocs are winning primaries, even against entrenched incumbents. Even worse, those that have been elected are far more effective that the average elected loser, and those wins have tended to be on the side of the Citizens.
They’re doing everything right, they’re succeeding, and they are gathering followers FAST.
No wonder the incumbent losers are panicking. They’ll eventually accept it, and get on board. Except the MAGAs, they should be panicking.