Abyssian
@Abyssian@lemmy.world
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to support@lemmy.world | 14 comments
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
You’re also welcome to study if you have a deeper interest in the topic. But I’ll be blocking you, because I don’t deal with bigots. So many of you trolls actually fit that word to completely and yet love to claim it about others. Hopefully you find a bit of self-awareness and notice that for yourself.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
No, they’re not. This is lazy idiocy. You could take any human complaining about any thing they don’t like, replace the thing they actually don’t like with “Jew”, and scream they antisemitic. It’s a pathetic attempt to make anyone who doesn’t like anything look like a horrible monster.
The rhetorical cloth only seems to fit because you cut out the most important part and replaced it with something that would work for the picture you’re trying to paint. It is hollow.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
You seem to be the sort of person who screams at others for cultural appropriation when all you know is the person’s skin color and have no knowledge of the culture in question.
- Comment on "No precedent in American history!" NYT would have defended child labor. 2 weeks ago:
They’ve made so much money they have too much influence to do away with them.
That one guy on the news found a way. I imagine it wouldn’t even take a thousand of us following that lead before things began to change.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Oh for suck sake. Plenty of cultures don’t and plenty of cultures do. Plenty of people lived places where meat was there only reliable source of sustenance.
I can’t stand this lazy, idiot defense of jumping to claiming someone is racist, or homophobic, or right-wing. You’re telling an old black man with the display name “Trump Rapes Kids” he’s using right-wing extremist logic because he’s willing to eat meat but finds it weird and creepy that some people want to fuck the animals. Brilliant.
I’m just going to block you now. Enjoy sticking your dick in a cat or whatever makes you happy and proud of yourself.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Equating a basic necessity to remain alive with getting personal sexual gratification from animals is a view most people in the world would consider strange. Eating meat is historically a normal human activity. Fucking nonhuman animals is not. There is no mysterious conflict in that outside of your own head.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Eating meat is normal human behavior. Fantasizing about fucking nonhuman animals is not.
- Comment on Lemmy > Reddit 2 weeks ago:
That’s crazy talk. “Man/male” and “woman/female” are terms with no set meaning. Anyone can decide which of these meaningless words they feel most fits them, or invent another. If you don’t agree, you’re a bigot.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
So you’re just saying furries are drawn to being a furry because they are mentally ill? And the evidence for that is soley based on a single very small study.
No. I’m trying to provide basic answers to complex questions. You’re more than welcome to study the neuroscience and psychology of human sexuality.
The only thing making me defensive is the connection you’re making between furries (consenting adults) with pedophiles. The latter absolutely should be burned alive and the former are just kinda weird people.
Both have a sexual attraction to things considered immoral. Creating fictional anthropomorphized animals who can speak and consent and drawing characters clearly intended to look and act like children but then claiming they’re really very, very old are both methods of trying to create a fictional scenario where playing out an immoral attraction could be argued to be moral.
Sexual attraction isn’t a thing people really have control of, though it can be influenced by the things we surround ourselves with. While you’re not likely going to “fix” someone who’s sexually attracted to children or animals by not plastering the internet with porn to fit their desires, having that can increase the attraction.
It’s an ongoing debate on whether the attempts to ban all such porn is more beneficial or more harmful, because while having easy access to immoral fetish porn does tend to increase that attraction not having that access as a psychosexual pressure vent could potentially cause someone to go look for a real child or animal instead.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
It’s still so weird to me. Not noting what instance a given post is from or knowing their tribal norms and making a simple comment and having a dozen people call for your death, and all of them feel that’s a sane and normal thing to do. This place becoming popular could be whole new fields of research in sociology and psychology.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Associated conditions included psychotic disorders (41 %), psychotic depression (24 %), bipolar disorder (18 %), and Cotard’s syndrome (12 %).
You’re hung up on wanting one specific mental disorder. Mental health is a complex topic. People with many disorders can be drawn to the ‘furry’ group for varying reasons.
You’re drawing the same link to if someone consumes X media they will likely engage in X action.
Neuroplasticity most strongly effects sexual attraction during puberty, however the things we spend time experiencing continue to have effects on that for at least the bulk of our lives. It has nothing to do with video games or rock music making children worship the devil. You’re conflating actual neuroscience with scare tactics you see on TV.
You seem defensive, and while I don’t mind discussion I have no interest in taking the time to write a dissertation for a social media response. You don’t understand my dislike. That’s alright. You don’t have to. Everyone in the world has their own point of view on all sorts of things. Being honest about that is just being honest about a basic fact of the human condition. It doesn’t mean someone’s calling for others who do a thing they dislike to be burned alive.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Which is still weird but not morally wrong, so there’s nothing wrong with letting them be.
There’s a huge difference between honestly saying you don’t like a given thing and hunting the people who do that thing down to force them to stop it or die. People on the internet have started to think simply voicing an opinion they don’t like is hate and persecution and intolerance. It screams of never having dealt with genuine intolerance.
I love when people wear clearly racist shirts, because that lets me know from a distance this isn’t a person I want to associate with. They’re allowed to have their asshole opinions. They’re not allowed to attack me or try to drive me out of town because of them.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Which mental illnesses?
Here’s a good starter article.
I’m not taking about flat out porn, just the sexualized images. Panty shots of characters clearly drawn to look like children, anthropomorphized animals with huge human breasts, etc.
Would you subscribe to the idea that playing violent video games, listening to heavy metal or watching violent movies makes people engage in violence?
No reasonable person does. However sexual attraction is a thing that very definitely can be influenced and change over time. If you go through your teen years where your biochemistry is pushing you towards sex and you see lots of sexualized animation or furry art then you’re going to end up much more likely drawn to that than if it’s something you never see until you’re in your 30s.
If you spend 10 years only able to access one specific niche of porn that you don’t like and you ‘make do’ with it, by the end of that time it might be the thing you’re most drawn to.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Even without actual animals I still see it as likely a group that people with certain mental illnesses are attracted to that encourages them to sexualize imaginary animals. It doesn’t seem like there is any healthy outcome from that. At best it’s encouraging sexual attraction to something that doesn’t exist, and at worst those things that don’t exist look like a cross between humans who do exist and animals who do exist and that could cause people to fall on the wrong size of that actual animals part.
The pedophile and animal art are two big things people are often going to encounter on the internet. Sexualized animated images of children and animals, and children-animals are far from uncommon. Neither of them seem like things that could be healthy. The sort of thing that should be discouraged and not encouraged.
I met a 20 something year old in prison who had molested one of his relatives. When he was out after that sentence his parole officer checked his phone and found videos of him fucking the family dog. He went back to prison for that. It would be much more surprising to find out he’d never seen any of that ‘art’ than to find out he had a big stash of it.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Even without actual animals I still see it as likely a group that people with certain mental illnesses are attracted to that encourages them to sexualize imaginary animals. It doesn’t seem like there is any healthy outcome from that. At best it’s encouraging sexual attraction to something that doesn’t exist, and at worst those things that don’t exist look like a cross between humans who do exist and animals who do exist and that could cause people to fall on the wrong size of that actual animals part.
I met a 20 something year old in prison who had molested one of his relatives. When he was out after that sentence his parole officer checked his phone and found videos of him fucking the family dog. It would be much more surprising to find out he’d never seen any of that ‘art’ than to find out he had a big stash of it.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
It’s extremely difficult to conclusively prove a thing doesn’t exist.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Furries don’t engage in non consensual acts by and large.
You asked “in your estimation, what’s okay/Kink and whats not?” right up there. I was answering that question. I never connected furries to it at all.
I’m not railing against it. It doesn’t make me uncomfortable. It’s at odds with my values and morals. It seems sort of like seeing people eat dog meat or something. A sexual desire for imaginary beings based on animals is weird as all hell to me. I’m not the one who chose to use animals. They did. When someone is a fan of sexualized images of vaguely human shaped animals that connects itself to zoophilia, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to do that.
There’s a big difference between giving your honest opinion on a thing and actively hating a thing. And a difference again between that and being intolerant and falling to violence against those who don’t see the world and the things in it in the same light that you do.
- Comment on 📛Killdozers, Rollout!📛 2 weeks ago:
This makes me remember a guy I was lucky enough to meet who had killed 2 people who had Hello Kitty tattooed on one of his cheeks and a swastika on the other. Somehow this seems like the sort of thing he’d enjoy.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
I don’t really have a list of sexual kinks I’m a fan of ant not a fan of. Anything forcibly involving non-consenting participants, whether they’re aware of that fact or not, I definitely see as being wrong.
There are over 8 billion people in the world with tens of thousands of combinations of cultures, ethnicities, religions, regional histories, and socioeconomic backgrounds. We’re not all going to agree on the morality of anything. Too many people online have decided to see simple honesty about that from people who feel differently about things than they go as hatred.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
I’ve seen old writings that say much the same about black people. Just because it’s written down something is evil doesn’t make that true. I haven’t met many Wendigos, so I reserve my right to judge them until I do.
I’d see a human searching for Wendigos to rape and upon not finding a handy orifice carving one with a hunting knife to stick his dick in as being a clear and obvious evil. I have met humans like that. I’m very willing to judge them.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Everyone in the world is never going to condone or be a fan of anything everyone else in the world does.
People who get off to anthropomorphized animals seem to have something wrong with their minds. I’m not going to lie about that or act as though I don’t see it that way. There’s a massive distinction between being honest that you don’t understand or like a thing and it doesn’t fit your values and world view, and trying to whip up a mob to kill people who do that thing.
The fall-back to comparing anyone who dislikes anything to racists or homophobes known for intolerant violence is lazy.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
It’s not really your fault, just an example of unconscious bias racism. You’re conditioned to assume the Wendigo is the scary monster and the human the innocent victim.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
The text in the image seems to strongly indicate the person was looking for a Wendigo, for sex. It seems the Wendigo had been minding it’s own business until the weird pervert arrived.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
I made my own a while back. Nothing is ever going to convince me that wanting to have sex with roughly human shaped animals is any less creepy and wrong than if they were saying the same about kids.
Some of them do. The whole anime girl clearly designed to look and act 10 who it’s “ok” to sexualize because she’s really thousands of years old. WINKWINK
Coming up with imaginary scenarios where it’s suddenly moral to have sex with kids or sheep is super weird and creepy.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Nothing says the Wendigo attacked. This guy seems to be hunting them to cut them open and rape the knife wound. That’s definitely high up on the list of unusual and horrifying comments.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Right. I’m known for being combative by things like asking people not to use slurs or having opinions you don’t like. You can just go on the block list. It’s a simple way to deal with not wanting to deal with smug shits who feel justified in insulting others.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
It’s ironic that you’re calling me “interpersonally immature” while you’re the one insulting me for no apparant reason.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
Nah, no bait. I don’t make people sad for fun. It’s honestly just creepy as fuck. I made an unpopular opinion post on it a while back.
- Comment on Uh-Oh 2 weeks ago:
No, I’m against raping both malevolent spirits and animals. Humans too, actually.