Dark 😔
freedom after speech
Submitted 14 hours ago by did_you_find_violets@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3a736e0b-0da0-4690-9484-46aa1ca67b91.jpeg
Comments
Keepthoseeyeslockedonmine@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Wataba@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
Oh look, current UK policy.
Agent641@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Roight! Off ta gaol with ye lad!
agent_nycto@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
This should be more shitpost-y. Have you tried a deep-fried filter and some mlg images?
teslekova@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
Idi Amin was a funny guy. Shame about all the other stuff.
Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 hours ago
zbyte64@awful.systems 6 hours ago
I meam that’s how it was after the founding of the USA. See the sedition act.
nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 6 hours ago
Clearly Idi Amin read Animal Farm.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
Clearly not, since he was famously illiterate
ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 hours ago
Damn, you got me at the end there.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 hours ago
Spanish constitution defines freedom of speech as “no censorship”. You can’t stop someone from publishing something but you very much can make them legally responsible for what they publish. Libel and defamation are still illegal under freedom of speech, right?
evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Hopefully I can cunningham’s law a more intelligent response, but libel and defamation aren’t “illegal” as in the police will arrest you for it, it’s a civil violation, so the target of that libel would have to sue you for it.
Different countries have different bars for proving defamation. Famously, British media avoids calling drunk people drunk, and instead uses “tired and emotional” or similar, because if you say someone was drunk, but you can’t prove it, you are liable if they sue. Contrast that to the US, where if you sue someone for calling you drunk, you have to prove that they would know that they are lying.
Both methods are subject to abuse, but since suing costs money, it’s more often a weapon of the privileged, so I prefer the US method.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 hours ago
In Spain people were also prosecuted for threats and promoting terrorism. One raper was sentenced to prison for praising ETA and insulting the King but he escaped to Belgium which denied Spain extradition because insulting Spanish king is not a crime there.
Being prosecuted for insulting the King is of course stupid and this law should be changed but this and praising ETA are just more examples of this you can’t legally say in Spain. The law can’t prevent you from saying it but it can punish you afterwards.
Zwiebel@feddit.org 10 hours ago
Yes, free speech is just about beeing able to voice your political opinion
evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Not just political