That doesn’t work anyway, since based on wheat variety, growing season, and grinding method, different flours have different information density.
Einstein-Landauer culinary units
Submitted 1 day ago by green_copper@kbin.earth to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/1747152201-20250513.webp
Comments
blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 day ago
ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
They have an international prototype sack of flour in an old missile silo in Kansas. Ultimately that’s what all the measurements are relative to
CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 23 hours ago
Except the “Room Temperature” room. The Room is located in Greendale.
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 23 hours ago
I like to read bedtime stories to my wheat, so it learns more and has higher information density
Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
Sounds like the culinary world would benefit from having a measurement system that accounts for these factors.
nyctre@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
We usually just look at the protein values on the package xD
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 hours ago
Wouldn’t this make the units temperature-dependent?
Landauer limit is one kTln2 per bit of information, so at 300K about 4 zeptojoule per bit.
dividing by c² we get 46 micro-quectogram per bit, so 46 yoctogram per terabit. 369 yoctogram per terabyte.
the Author wants half a septillion terabytes, 0.5•10²⁴ terabytes, half a yotta-terabyte.
That makes 184 grams.Since I don’t know what on earth “a cup of flour” is, I can’t judge if the comic character proposes a reasonable conversion, but 0.2kg seems like a reasonable amount to use in cooking.
For baking I would rather have my units temperature dependent than density dependent (I can compact my flour or work with water or nuts, all having different densities, but my room temperature will always be roughly 300).
I condone einstein-landauer units.zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 22 hours ago
184 grams is a touch high for “a cup of flour”, but I’m not gonna check your math, and the comic probably wanted to use “close enough” round-ish numbers. The weight of a cup of flour is usually somewhere between 120g and 145g, going by the conversions used by major baking recipe publishers like King Arthur, Cooks Illustrated, Washington Post, New York Times, etc.
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 hours ago
I fear their apartment is at -50°C and this is a cry for help.
At least I am relieved to know that even acclaimed authors native to the cup-measurement system don’t know what “a cup of flour is”.
I’ll be off baking my pannenkoek with 150g of flour then.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 hours ago
Mass, not weight! Only because we’re being technical already.
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 hours ago
I figured it out. Typed the ln2 into my text and then forgot it in the calculator.
Great, I’ma redo alll my numbers then rq
HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 hours ago
Information is physical? I’m gonna need a source on that one.
cholesterol@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
The idea is that information must have a physical representation. But I don’t know how that would lead to a standardized mass of a byte.
vithigar@lemmy.ca 5 hours ago
No, you missed the point. See @milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee’s comment and link to Landauer’s Principle, the namesake of which is literally named in the title of the comic.
TL;DR: Storing information requires a change in entropy. A change in entropy requires a change in energy. There must be a minimum non-zero amount of energy required for a given quantity of information. Energy is mass due to mass-energy equivalence. ∴ information has mass.
milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 15 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle
Also see Redjard’s comment to this post
kameecoding@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
i will Physically bitchslap you then you can deduce yourself the information about whether your face hurts or not, ayy lmao.
At least that’s how I choose to interpret this new information
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
I’d give a source but it’s physically in my house and it’s heavy
Mastershelf@lemmy.one 1 day ago
The real problem is measuring flour by volume instead of mass.
Lucien@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Solve both by measuring with moles
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 23 hours ago
are other burrowing animals also ok?
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Except that moles would only work for counting granules of ground flour, as there is no “flour” molecule. Also, you’d need to have a very accurate measurement of the average mass of a single granule (or you’d need a packing efficiency coefficient and an average granule radius, otherwise you’d have to literally count them. Also, a mole of flour granules would be INSANELY large. 6.02*10^23 of anything larger than a macromolecule is no joke. At this point, since you’d have to weigh it or measure its volume anyway (unless you feel like counting microscopic flour particles for the next few trillion years), you might as well just use grams.
imgcat@lemmy.ml 22 hours ago
Made even worse by mixing cups, spoons, pints, gallons and their crazy ratios
WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 day ago
Hundred sextillion terabytes. Yeah, everybody of calling it hungry sex bites in minutes.
Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Oh sure, throw a fit — just wait until you want to convert those units to kilojoules!
Who’s laughing now, tablespoons?!
Sedathems@mander.xyz 1 day ago
I have absolutely no understanding of whatever is said here
DahGangalang@infosec.pub 23 hours ago
Metric appears to end at 10^30, but even then, I think the better way to phrase that number would be 5,000 quetta-bytes
Tera = 10^12; Septillion = 10^21 Source
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 hours ago
*500 000 quettabytes
*Sextillion = 10²¹ ( = Zetta)I’d recommend wikipedia here, your source seems to have taken 3 years to update their table and their image is still outdated.
They likely didn’t use quetta because it was only added 3 years ago, and is still not widely known. Or maybe it sounded better.
DahGangalang@infosec.pub 12 hours ago
Derp, that’s what happens when you have to bounce between too many pages on mobile.
Thanks for the pointer!
Zip2@feddit.uk 16 hours ago
Still a more acceptable measurement than “1 cup”.
VoterFrog@lemmy.world 32 minutes ago
The whole point of cups is that you can buy an ingredient by the gallon and it’s very likely that you can double or halve the recipe to your heart’s content and eventually use up the entire package with no waste.