Okay but why does this look better than the actual thing though
Vintage
Submitted 5 days ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to [deleted]
https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/02d64cc0-4098-4d52-9043-5aae954b91dd.jpeg
Comments
garbagebagel@lemmy.world 5 days ago
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Colour! Silver is boring unless it’s a highlight.
werewolfborg@ttrpg.network 5 days ago
I’ve seen ones that were custom painted and they look significantly better. It doesn’t stop them from being dumpsters on wheels, but at least they look finished.
MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
Uhhh we might not see the same thing
Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
More like 1988.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Clearly an 87
mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 5 days ago
Looks way cooler
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 days ago
greybeard@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Obviously fake. You can’t buy a car that cheap.
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
That vehicle has already lasted longer, and been more useful, than any of the embarrassing new ones.
Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Hi, is this available?
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Yes, are you still interested?
over_clox@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Hi, how many miles per gallon does it get?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 days ago
Hi, how many
miles per gallongallons per mile does it get?FTFY.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Ironic, gallons per mile is actually a more useful measure for high fuel efficiency vehicles because it directly represents fuel consumption. Differences in MPG are more misleading to intuition as MPG increases.
For example, upgrading from an 18mpg car to a 28mpg car saves more fuel than upgrading from a 34mpg car to a 50mpg car. It is easy to be misled that 34mpg -> 50mpg is more savings because it is an upgrade of 16mpg rather than only 10mpg.
nthavoc@lemmy.today 5 days ago
It gets 13 gallons per mile.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 days ago
Miles, plural??
Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
Smiles per gallon
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 5 days ago
More desirable than the new ones. Looks like it could withstand someone spitting on it.
gibmiser@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Lol I’ll take two
stewi1914@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
SIBERTRUCK
loomy@lemy.lol 5 days ago
worth it
random_character_a@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I recently bought a wearable device from Amazon with programmable esp32 s3 board. What I got was basically buying a cybertruck and getting this.
Valmond@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Esp32s are great, what was your expectations?
random_character_a@lemmy.world 5 days ago
My expectation was to get a product with esp32 s3 from 2020, not the 2016 version.
Just like the car in the picture gets you from A to B, I can work with that chip. It’s just a pain to strip and modify stuff designed for the S3 to get at least partially working on the chip I got. Luckily I don’t need every “bell and whistle”.
altphoto@lemmy.today 5 days ago
Probably lead acid batteries.
postnataldrip@lemmy.world 5 days ago
This is fake.
Panel gaps are too consistent and it doesn’t look like anything has fallen off.
huquad@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
Even survives car washes. Fake as hell
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Things were just built better back then
ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 5 days ago
Also, as cars designed by immature adults go, it might just look better than the real thing.
InFerNo@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
Survivorship bias