Okay but why does this look better than the actual thing though
Vintage
Submitted 1 month ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to [deleted]
https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/02d64cc0-4098-4d52-9043-5aae954b91dd.jpeg
Comments
garbagebagel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Colour! Silver is boring unless it’s a highlight.
werewolfborg@ttrpg.network 1 month ago
I’ve seen ones that were custom painted and they look significantly better. It doesn’t stop them from being dumpsters on wheels, but at least they look finished.
MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Uhhh we might not see the same thing
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
because humans actually like smooth curves, as it turns out
Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
More like 1988.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Clearly an 87
mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
Looks way cooler
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
That vehicle has already lasted longer, and been more useful, than any of the embarrassing new ones.
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Hi, is this available?
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes, are you still interested?
greybeard@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Obviously fake. You can’t buy a car that cheap.
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Hi, how many miles per gallon does it get?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Hi, how many
miles per gallongallons per mile does it get?FTFY.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ironic, gallons per mile is actually a more useful measure for high fuel efficiency vehicles because it directly represents fuel consumption. Differences in MPG are more misleading to intuition as MPG increases.
For example, upgrading from an 18mpg car to a 28mpg car saves more fuel than upgrading from a 34mpg car to a 50mpg car. It is easy to be misled that 34mpg -> 50mpg is more savings because it is an upgrade of 16mpg rather than only 10mpg.
nthavoc@lemmy.today 1 month ago
It gets 13 gallons per mile.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Miles, plural??
Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Smiles per gallon
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
More desirable than the new ones. Looks like it could withstand someone spitting on it.
gibmiser@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Lol I’ll take two
stewi1914@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
SIBERTRUCK
loomy@lemy.lol 1 month ago
worth it
random_character_a@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I recently bought a wearable device from Amazon with programmable esp32 s3 board. What I got was basically buying a cybertruck and getting this.
Valmond@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Esp32s are great, what was your expectations?
random_character_a@lemmy.world 1 month ago
My expectation was to get a product with esp32 s3 from 2020, not the 2016 version.
Just like the car in the picture gets you from A to B, I can work with that chip. It’s just a pain to strip and modify stuff designed for the S3 to get at least partially working on the chip I got. Luckily I don’t need every “bell and whistle”.
altphoto@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Probably lead acid batteries.
postnataldrip@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is fake.
Panel gaps are too consistent and it doesn’t look like anything has fallen off.
huquad@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Even survives car washes. Fake as hell
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Things were just built better back then
ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
Also, as cars designed by immature adults go, it might just look better than the real thing.
InFerNo@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Survivorship bias