Ubisoft games have such a weird “design by committee” feel to it. Like they poll the internet every few weeks and make decisions off of that. New hot game has battle pass? WE HAVE BATTLE PASS.
They also seem to follow a checklist of mediocrity. Every game needs a dozen collectable items. Every game needs to have these types of quests. Every game has to have a massive open world. Every game needs a online component and live service. Every game needs a incredible hook, which then they Marvel-safe it to avoid offending online babies.
Their games come off with 7/10 energy. Ubisoft games don’t move the needle. They’re pretty adequate as a game. But when I have thousands of games to choose from every year… Ill pass.
bennel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I disagree. Ubisoft has been very consistently trash for a while.
BonerMan@ani.social 1 month ago
Not really, look at anno for example. Its just the big titles that are regarded as not good.
olicvb@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Yea, I mean Watchdogs 2, The Division, Steep, I know some friends loved For Honor and R6: Siege is amazing.
Seems people tend to see ubisoft as AC and FarCry only.
neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
1602 was the best Anno. Fight me.
icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Their current Monopoly game is infamously bad