I can’t help but think of this.
Actual nightmare material.
Every time I get an email about
Submitted 7 months ago by EpicStuff@lemmy.ca to [deleted]
https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/14af8b40-b3e2-4d25-a17f-8080aa6d234a.jpeg
Comments
db2@lemmy.world 7 months ago
NightAuthor@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I’m pretty sure this has that fancy transitioning glass, when you lock the door it goes opaque.
turbowafflz@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Hmm, what happens if there’s a power outage? Or is dark the default state and it needs power to be clear?
jaybone@lemmy.world 7 months ago
That’s what they want you to believe.
red_rising@lemmy.world 7 months ago
One persons nightmare is another persons fetish.
johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 7 months ago
This might be a prison.
Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 7 months ago
Just like those “we value your privacy” cookie banners that don’t give you the option to reject all. If they truly valued my privacy, they would give me that option instead of having me toggle off 500000 “partners” one by one in the hopes I accidentally skip one. Bastards.
spongebue@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Or just… Not have 500000 partners in the first place
unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
Bunch of sluts
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
I like the one that takes 30 seconds to deny all but accepts all instantly.
Most transparent dark pattern
ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 7 months ago
I just decide that any site doing that doesn’t really have anything meaningful to provide and has mostly copy-pasted content from actual resource-providing websites, with added SEO.
So I just close the site most of the time.So far it has paid off. I tend to find more sites that give information that was actually written by someone knowledgable about the field.
Thinking I should start making my own list, considering search engines are probably never going to make those easier to find.
blackn1ght@feddit.uk 7 months ago
Those aren’t compliant. The reject all needs to be as prominent as the accept all option without any additional clicks. So many sites get it wrong it’s insane!
Amir@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
So many sites get it wrong
If they get away with it, they very much got it right
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Don’t forget the cameras
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 7 months ago
But they’ll see me shirtless.
thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 months ago
And how much poop I get on my hands with my clumsy wipe
Omgarm@lemmy.world 7 months ago
If you sit the proper way around you can’t see other people anyway, so just pretend you’re alone.
JigglypuffSeenFromAbove@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Now there’s at least three of us: you, me and George Costanza.
RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 7 months ago
We value your privacy, we share your data with all of our 762 partners!
HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 months ago
It is honestly disgusting when they list the number of parties, especially when you see 100+ vendors on the “Legitimate purpose” toggle. Fuck off you have a legitimate purpose to my browsing.
jonasw@discuss.tchncs.de 7 months ago
“We value our customers privacy”
“Privacy is our top priority”
Hellstormy@lemmy.world 7 months ago
“We and our 895 partners value your privacy very much”
the_third@feddit.de 7 months ago
“We value our customers privacy”
I mean, I can imagine that. I’m sure they know the exact market value of every behavioral data point they can extract from me.
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 7 months ago
- where is doesn’t stand in the way of profit
J3K@kbin.social 7 months ago
“We value our customers' privacy - it's our main revenue stream!”
JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Why is there no paper or bidets…
velvetThunder@lemmy.zip 7 months ago
Enshitification, literally
lugal@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Asking the real questions…
Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 7 months ago
“it’s called being transparent. Oh no, not for us”
altima_neo@lemmy.zip 7 months ago
Lately, all Ive been getting are changes involving arbitration. Shit, I even got one from a fucking grocery store app.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
How it’s not illegal to bypass the friggin justice system…
onion@feddit.de 7 months ago
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I know this bathroom, they have the stalls, you sit down and your head peeks over the top of the walls. I guess they expected everyone to be very short? I’m not even six foot so I don’t know. I think of it as the social shitter.
WashedOver@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
There’s public washrooms like this in a mall in Seattle, or at least there was a few years back. Half height stalls. When one is sitting the walls only come up to your elbows. One of the most bizarre setups for a public bathroom I’ve seen in my travels.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
Poor Shaq if he ever has to use those
lastrogue@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Pray we do not update it again.
Mio@feddit.nu 7 months ago
Are they required by law or something to send those out? It is almost like needing to reconfirm your cookie in the webbrowser
synapse1278@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Transparency is key
asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I tend to always read these, both when I sign up and when there are changes. Idk if I ever felt that it changed significantly at all from what I expected originally. They are “updated” annually and when a new law passes so usually it is no change or something about the new law. Basically usually if you consented to the original privacy policy, updates are unlikely to have anything surprising and new to change your mind. I guess unless it went from none to some/a lot of shared data!
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
I respect when they summarize their changes at the top / in the update email
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Ive gotten 4 notifications from sammy sung advising me they have updated their TOS. never used to get those
molten@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Hey, at least they’re transparent.
pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 months ago
You’re right, that’s unrealistic.
If those stall dividers were fully opaque with a one-way mirror acting as the wall, that would be more like it.