First time I’ve learnt what the past tense of yeet is.
Academic language
Submitted 10 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/608bb2eb-bd37-4e08-a6a5-c76aaefb5660.jpeg
Comments
damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Dasus@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Academic language, bruh
Contramuffin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I wonder if the wording depends on the field.
As a microbiologist, I would have phrased it like:
- The sample was destroyed during handling and was not considered for further analysis.
- The animal was not amenable to handling and was excluded from sample collection.
jwelch55@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Is ‘yote’ the past tense of ‘yeet’? I assumed it’d be ‘yeeted’
ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 10 months ago
“Proper” conjugations are not totally settled, especially given its slang nature. Yeet does feel like it might be strong (stem-changing), though there’s really no authority on it. Interestingly, I found on googling that there is a version of the verb yeet stemming from Middle English verb yeten, which has two variations. The first meant “to address with the pronoun ye” (e.g., as opposed to thou) and had weak conjugations (i.e., yeeted/yeted). The other sense refered to pouring or moving liquids and could be either strong or weak (simple past: yet or yote, or yeted; participle: yote, yoten, yeted). So, looking for historical comparisons is also unhelpful.
not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 10 months ago
That’s a very circumlocutious way of saying IDK, and I thank you for it.
Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I like “yet” as a past tense because it sounds needlessly confusing.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 months ago
snooggums@midwest.social 10 months ago
While “yeeted” may sound like the past tense of “yeet,” it is actually incorrect. The correct past tense of “yeet” is “yote.” Using “yeeted” instead of “yote” can make your writing sound awkward and unprofessional.
This is the best thing I have read today, thank you!
newnton@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
I loved the random seemingly unrelated Huckleberry Finn quote in the middle of their definition of yote
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
the way language works, it’s just however people choose to use it. Use the version you think is best.
personally i go for “yate” beause that sounds funny.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Go for both with yoted
Splatterphace@lemm.ee 10 months ago
This is like bureauocratic poetry
fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 months ago
I like to think about it like a rap battle
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 months ago
You know you’ve made it when you can drop the pretense.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
To
liveyote or not toliveyote, that is the questionAnticorp@lemmy.world 10 months ago
When did yeeted become yote?
King_Bob_IV@startrek.website 10 months ago
No idea but I love it
anarchy79@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yeet, yote, yutt.
ilinamorato@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I love this sort of thing. Like NASA scientists calling an explosion a “rapid unscheduled disassembly.”
SaintWacko@midwest.social 10 months ago
Or a data breach an “emergent distributed backup”
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Our data is federated
LillyPip@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Or ‘I dunno what was wrong, but banging it helped’ as ‘percussive maintenance’.
marcos@lemmy.world 10 months ago
At the first days of planning their Moon landing, NASA came out with lithobraking for the times the capsule wouldn’t slow down enough.
Then, some 20 and something years lather, when planing their Mars landers, they decided that no, lithobraking is a perfectly fine thing to do and the landers would use it by design.
So be wary of rocket scientists making jokes.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 months ago
for the record… the engineering behind that was quite sound.
it’s their ability to use consistent units of measurements that’s in question.
Trashcan@lemmy.world 10 months ago
For anybody like mine who doesn’t know enough ancient greek… Lithos means rock…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithobraking
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Well, if there’s no humans on board and the bots can take the impact, why not?
Natanael@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
If you lithobreak into a low gravity object with enough momentum and at an angle you may return into orbit