Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Academic language

⁨1089⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/608bb2eb-bd37-4e08-a6a5-c76aaefb5660.jpeg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I love this sort of thing. Like NASA scientists calling an explosion a “rapid unscheduled disassembly.”

    source
    • SaintWacko@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Or a data breach an “emergent distributed backup”

      source
      • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Our data is federated

        source
      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Or ‘I dunno what was wrong, but banging it helped’ as ‘percussive maintenance’.

        source
    • marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      At the first days of planning their Moon landing, NASA came out with lithobraking for the times the capsule wouldn’t slow down enough.

      Then, some 20 and something years lather, when planing their Mars landers, they decided that no, lithobraking is a perfectly fine thing to do and the landers would use it by design.

      So be wary of rocket scientists making jokes.

      source
      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        for the record… the engineering behind that was quite sound.

        it’s their ability to use consistent units of measurements that’s in question.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Trashcan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        For anybody like mine who doesn’t know enough ancient greek… Lithos means rock…

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithobraking

        source
      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Well, if there’s no humans on board and the bots can take the impact, why not?

        source
      • Natanael@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        If you lithobreak into a low gravity object with enough momentum and at an angle you may return into orbit

        source
  • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    First time I’ve learnt what the past tense of yeet is.

    source
    • xthexder@l.sw0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Human language truely is a wonder to behold.

      source
      • 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        And to beyote

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Dasus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Academic language, bruh

      source
  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I wonder if the wording depends on the field.

    As a microbiologist, I would have phrased it like:

    • The sample was destroyed during handling and was not considered for further analysis.
    • The animal was not amenable to handling and was excluded from sample collection.
    source
  • jwelch55@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Is ‘yote’ the past tense of ‘yeet’? I assumed it’d be ‘yeeted’

    source
    • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      “Proper” conjugations are not totally settled, especially given its slang nature. Yeet does feel like it might be strong (stem-changing), though there’s really no authority on it. Interestingly, I found on googling that there is a version of the verb yeet stemming from Middle English verb yeten, which has two variations. The first meant “to address with the pronoun ye” (e.g., as opposed to thou) and had weak conjugations (i.e., yeeted/yeted). The other sense refered to pouring or moving liquids and could be either strong or weak (simple past: yet or yote, or yeted; participle: yote, yoten, yeted). So, looking for historical comparisons is also unhelpful.

      source
      • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That’s a very circumlocutious way of saying IDK, and I thank you for it.

        source
      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I like “yet” as a past tense because it sounds needlessly confusing.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      thecontentauthority.com/blog/yeeted-vs-yote

      source
      • snooggums@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        While “yeeted” may sound like the past tense of “yeet,” it is actually incorrect. The correct past tense of “yeet” is “yote.” Using “yeeted” instead of “yote” can make your writing sound awkward and unprofessional.

        This is the best thing I have read today, thank you!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • newnton@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I loved the random seemingly unrelated Huckleberry Finn quote in the middle of their definition of yote

        source
    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      the way language works, it’s just however people choose to use it. Use the version you think is best.

      personally i go for “yate” beause that sounds funny.

      source
    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Go for both with yoted

      source
  • Splatterphace@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is like bureauocratic poetry

    source
    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I like to think about it like a rap battle

      source
  • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You know you’ve made it when you can drop the pretense.

    source
  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    To live yote or not to live yote, that is the question

    source
    • Anticorp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      When did yeeted become yote?

      source
      • King_Bob_IV@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        No idea but I love it

        source
  • anarchy79@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yeet, yote, yutt.

    source