LillyPip
@LillyPip@lemmy.ca
- Comment on Oh! 17 hours ago:
I did.
- Comment on Oh! 2 days ago:
I dunno – if someone said these exact words to me but sarcastically, that might actually work. Like, we might wind up having a conversation about how cringe this is, and so this line might work in a way.
- Comment on Pitching or catching? 4 days ago:
Dammit dad, go to bed.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
I think two major things are understanding platform standards and that what users say they want is often not what they need or what will work best for them.
Innovation is fine, but IUE and usability are often better served by following common platform standards (for general apps on the OS, not necessarily trying to match existing and often shitty enterprise software).
Also, it’s important to look for root causes when people ask for a specific feature. Many users focus on specific UI elements when they’re having issues, and in a complex system, it’s easy to wind up with bloat by solving the wrong problem. This is often how enterprise software becomes so unwieldy, with options and elements seemingly vomited all over the UI. What users think they want and what they need can be very different things.
Sorry if this is too general or basic. It’s hard to design a system that works for beginners and experts, and A/B testing a mix of users early with lofi prototypes helps a lot. For existing software, just watching users interact with it is massively helpful.
Is this what you meant? Happy to be more specific if I missed the mark.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Yeah, sometimes it really hurt.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Nothing that techy. I did include power users in tests, but their requests were usually for specific hotkeys or to have their favourite (and lesser used by most users) feature front and centre.
It can be difficult to balance a UI for inexperienced and powerful users, but watching them interact with prototypes and the actual software does help.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
As part of my career in software design, I used to run A/B testing and usability tests. This meant sitting with users and watching them use the software. Since IUE (initial user experience) was very important, this often included inexperienced users.
The data was absolutely worth it, and definitely improved my designs, but it took a lot of patience to watch people struggle and fail without intervening or saying anything that would affect the results. It was rewarding, but sometimes excruciating.
- Comment on THIS creative reply actually got them hired 1 week ago:
Now where’s my red stapler?!?
- Comment on ???? 1 week ago:
My son is almost 30. Is it too late?
- Comment on ???? 1 week ago:
Hamsters are cannibals.
It’s weird, I know, because they’re so cute. They are though,
- Comment on chad 3 weeks ago:
If you don’t sin, he died for nothing.
- Comment on chad 3 weeks ago:
Thanks, that was hell on mobile.
- Comment on Important information, everyone! 3 weeks ago:
Yeah. I’ve already passed the Socially Awkward station, and You’re Putting People Off was like 2 stops ago. Guess this is my stop.
- Comment on Superb cool 3 weeks ago:
I just watched a long form video on the difference between war and conflict, and how we can’t really call many animal conflicts ’war’.
And then how some animal conflicts, like ant and chimp wars really are war. It was pretty cool.
Since some dinosaurs species were around for a very long time, I wonder whether they did wage war? They had plenty of time to develop culture and more than enough to hate each other. Maybe war really never changes.
- Comment on Pretty fly little guy 5 weeks ago:
Uno dos tres quatro cinco cinco seis
- Comment on Then and now 1 month ago:
I can’t find the article now. It was either Vox, Forbes, or Hollywood Informer.
Now, all the top 30 pages of results come up with makeup artists speculating on what he’s doing to his hand to hide whatever bruising is happening there. I’m sorry, I wish I’d saved it.
- Comment on Then and now 1 month ago:
It is though. Only a bit, but you can’t get that orange even using the orange concealer he uses wrong.
Fun fact: it’s not spray tan. The real story is much sadder. It’s a certain brand of concealer he buys in bulk, because
Way back in his *the Apprentice * days, a talented makeup artist made him look far, far better on camera than he looked in the mirror, and he asked her how she made him look so good.
According to an interview she later gave, she explained her whole routine. It seems he stopped listening after her fist few sentences, though, because from then on he began buying the first step she used (a certain orange concealer) and just slathering it all over his face as the one and only step.
Some of his previous maids have confirmed this, and some have said he goes through shirts like no one else because the concealer stains like crazy. It’s not meant to be used that way, you’re supposed to use it sparingly underneath foundation, powder, etc. he uses it alone and in copious amounts.
Spray tan or bronzer would at least make some sense. The real story is worse.
He is that inattentive and stupid.
- Comment on Then and now 1 month ago:
They’re all basically the same. Narcissistic dragons.
- Comment on Then and now 1 month ago:
The bottom one. He’s pretty orange, but the contrast was clearly boosted to make him look even more orange than usual.
- Comment on Then and now 1 month ago:
I get that this image has been manipulated to make him look worse, but not by much.
It’s insane he doesn’t see how bad he looks. In normal pictures he looks like a reverse orange raccoon, and he thinks that’s a good look.
Like, it’s so sad nobody in his circle can tell him how bad he always looks. They blaze him to the point he thinks he’s fucking Adonis.
Absolutely sad. And even more sad that the rest of us see how sad this is. If much rather see reality and be poor than look like a sad clown on the world stage.
I’d feel very bad for him and others like him (Elon, several celebrities) than seriously not know how I look like an utter buffoon in front of everyone.
- Comment on Apparently they are actually for birds??? 1 month ago:
‘Perfectly capable’.
Look, it works, okay? Survival if the fittest is a misinterpreted; it’s survival of the fittest enough.
Have we tried just dropping out babies on city asphalt with a few sticks? Maybe we’re overdoing things.
- Comment on Apparently they are actually for birds??? 1 month ago:
Nobody sees him eating other muppets, so 100% ambush predator.
No one knows what happens when the lights go off on Sesame Street.
I assume it’s like My Friendly Neighbourhood, and Big Bird is the apex predator. Sometimes muppets just… vanish.
- Comment on Apparently they are actually for birds??? 1 month ago:
Hey man, all ducks are beautiful.
*disclaimer: I do NOT want to see your dick. Do not DM me your ….
Oh no, I think I bollocksed this. Comment.
- Comment on Apparently they are actually for birds??? 1 month ago:
Sounds like a skill issue.
- Comment on 🎶🎶🎶 1 month ago:
Earliest I have is from 2017, 15 years after. It would be fun to see the original if it still exists.
- Comment on 🎶🎶🎶 1 month ago:
Oh my god, it’s been 22 years.
This meme can buy alcohol now.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
I stopped giving a fuck way back when the choice was between that and killing myself.
That was the only way my nerdy girl self could live beyond 12 years old.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Oof. My 10 year old girl soul hurts just from the thumbnail.
- Comment on Did you do this at your highschool? 1 month ago:
Was this in the US? Sounds like a good way to be shot, scaring people and looking like you’re not human.
- Comment on Fuckin gooners 1 month ago:
To be fair, you don’t always need to rely on fan mods for this. Apparently, Rockstar spent an absurd amount of time and attention getting the jiggle physics on horse testicles just right.