Metric allows you to convert between length volume and mass in your head. Someone smarter than me could probably take a reasonable estimate of how long a kettle will take to boil just by knowing it’s wattage and estimating its volume.
You’re right that “pounds” may have e been a practical measurement back when people didn’t have calibrated and everyone’s hand weighed a pound. However, that advantage ceased once everyone standardised those measurements.
A metre is equally divisible by 50, 25, 20, 10, 5, and 2. There arr numerous advantages to a base 10 system.
lauha@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Metric is just as great for everyday life as imperial units.
While I agree in principle, I also enjoy the chaos that imperial system causes when you try adding up 1 1/8 inches + 5 27/32 inches + 7 3/64 inches instead of just using decimal numbers.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
This is what the metricians say to feel better about themselves, but they never mean it.
“Oh yes, I’ll have a 236.588 milliliters of tea, thank you for offering”
“The kids are out playing in the back 0.914 meters”
“Doctor, I think I broke my left 30.48 centimeters”
Do you see how silly you would sound if you didn’t use imperial?
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
I was co confused until I got the joke lol
aMockTie@piefed.world 10 hours ago
1/8 = 4/32 3/16 = 6/32 4 + 6 + 27 = 37 37/32 = 1 5/32 1 + 5 + 7 + 1 = 14 Total: 14 5/32
I wouldn’t call it chaos, it’s a straightforward algorithm:
This works for every measurement because the denominator is always a power of 2.
With that said I absolutely prefer metric.
tempest@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
In practice you would just use decimal inches. Doesn’t really make it better but you can machine something without ever seeing a fraction if you want to since everything will be in thousandths of an inch.
aMockTie@piefed.world 10 hours ago
Maybe in your particular industry, but I reckon most people using imperial units aren’t using measuring devices with decimal inches or needing the precision of .0001”
JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 12 hours ago
Having done my share of automotive and carpentry work, I’ve never in my life had to go down to 64ths. 32nds is the smallest fraction I’ve ever had to use and the amount of times I’ve had to get that small could probably be counted on one hand.
mkwt@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
In US machine shops if they’re getting down to that level of measurement, they’ll switch over to milli-inches.
Yes, milli-inches are an actual unit in use.
lauha@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Are you saying adding 8ths, 16ths and 32nds is trivial and having 64th in my example made it unrealistic?
JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
I’m saying that if you knew what you were talking about you wouldn’t be working in 64ths in the first place. You picked 64ths because “hurr sure Americans dumb” and you know it.
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
If someone were adding those figures they would switch to decimal. I built furniture for 2 years, 64ths are almost never used over thousands of an inch. If you need to be finer than 32nds you use thou. And that pretty much only for wood. Machine shop I worked in used thou exclusively.
starik@lemmy.today 11 hours ago
Which is called a “mil”, a name that has never caused confusion
lauha@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
While in theory it is like that, I as a non english speaker have come across people trying to add up inch fractions more time than I remember.
taiyang@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Wheeeeeeee fractions!
But after multiplying, 8 + 54 + 3 over 64 is just clean fun, you end up with 14 1/64 inches and wanna die because you accidentally cut the material at 14 inches and now your whole day is ruined.