I would love these for when I’m dealing with companies and sales people.
Dumb glasses
Submitted 2 weeks ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5d91f9b0-ac01-42b4-8256-e4dbdfcd5953.png
Comments
minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Do they record your voice also? Because they may violate some wire tap laws.
justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Depending on context and country filming ppl without their knowledge is already illegal.
beejboytyson@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Not in canada, just one person has to be in the know.
PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So is there a link that exists already? I’m interested in tattooing this to my jackets.
whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Sue them under CFAA for accessing a site they weren’t granted permission to access, brick their device and take their money
m3t00@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
exploit the exploits. or just lay there. white hats use exploits to fix machines. like locking the neighbor’s gate they left open. or steal their stuff. your call
MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
That’s more grey hat. White hats don’t do anything without explicit permission.
kamen@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s been a while since phones started asking for user confirmation to open a link from a QR code.
dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
I don’t care about being filmed in public. After all I’m in public, if I want privacy I’ll go somewhere else.
Obligatory fuck meta though.
Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 2 weeks ago
if I want privacy I’ll go somewhere else.
Because they absolutely could not just follow you.
dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
People could do that before meta glasses. I’m not talking about governments here. I’m talking about regular people and you have no illusion of privacy in public. Pretty common sense that.
imjustmsk@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I don’t know, but it would be wierd if someone’s stalking you in public though, So yea having all these footages that can be stitched together which says wherever you go…
(this is a stupid hyper hypothetical scenario I made up, not that meta would be interested to do all that work just to track a person)
dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
People could do that before bro. Phone, DSLR, etc.
You have no assumption of privacy in public. If this hypothetical stalker is following you then they’ll do that with or without meta glasses.
mrnobody@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
paranoid@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Risky click of the day!
For the curious, it’s a link to a petition to ban these glasses. And while I absolutely hate these glasses and want legislation limiting them in at least some capacity, I don’t know that it will be successful - it is perfectly legal to photograph and record people in public (where there is “no expectation of privacy”).
The fact that there is no indication when they are in use is concerning, and something there should be laws around (although, thinking it through a bit more, there’s no indicator on, say, a cellphone). The petition mentions audio consent laws, which is another potential avenue for legislation, but not all states have two party consent (where everyone involved in a recorded conversation knows it’s being recorded).
In my humble opinion, as some dude writing a comment on the internet, is that the best chance for legislation would be around connecting personal data with the data recorded by the glasses. The scenario I’m thinking of is something like “hey slopbot, what are the names and addresses of everyone I’ve seen today”. It would then link the recording to other public images of you, which would likely provide a name, and then search those people finder sites and get all of that, as well as your previous addresses, family members, phone numbers, arrest history, and a list of fears.
I hate all of this
mrnobody@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
Haha yeah my bad no context.
My concern and reason for signing was, my kid in hs said a guy in class was using them, joking about use for a test. Then someone commented if he was uploading pics of his gf yet (popular girl I assume)and I really grew concerned. I totally get kids joking around, but at the point of under age limit, where do you draw the line is the device is always recording data? You could make moderators unintentionally view CP to a degree.
Yes, “public” doesn’t immediately scream privacy, however, when i walk around the city, NOBODY knows who I am. They won’t remember my face, don’t know my name, address, etc. So, there’s privacy from humans since we don’t all wear name tags with our phone number or address.
Overhearing a conversion is one thing, but recording it is a whole other issue! What about self incrimination? What about no consent from being recorded? I think of a show, Impractical Jokers, where they do a lot of stuff in public, and sometimes faces are blurred likely bc that person didn’t consent. Why would these social media stuff be any different?!
Idk, I think It’s awful, and worse so since Zuck pushed back on the lawsuit to get gov regulation in social media and age verification. To me, they’re buying politicians left and right, so they’ll get their way, but it’s “security theater” action basically. Especially data harvesting! Nothing more.
RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I kinda want to glue a huge camera to a pair of goggles and paint a huge facebok/meta logo on it. Then i will walk around public places and go “what?” when people confront me.
farting_gorilla@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Sounds like something Dom Joly would do :)
Hiro8811@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Just print the Epstein list on the shirt
Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
My god hes disappeared
WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 weeks ago
Is goatse.cx still around? Have that in QR for the meta glasses.
fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I wonder if that QR code thing would work for the TSA/police cameras that are everywhere now?
Juliee@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That would be pretty cool.
Generally guys I am migrating to the countryside. I think that cities are cooked and this is just another confirmation.
acme401@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
They’re moving away because capitalism makes them unaffordable. It has very little to do with how easy it is to grow food or “live” in a city…
StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
These comments are a cesspit
libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
snook goggles
FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I saw these on the Canadian version of The Price is Right
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
why would you make smart glasses across process QR codes automatically? or even at all
Etterra@discuss.online 2 weeks ago
I want that shirt.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I mean hidden cameras have been a thing for many decades, if not a century. There’s nothing new here, zuckerberg pretending he invented something is an old cliche at this point too.
Nomad@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
In the stone age of qrcode scanners, the scanner would enter the phone number directly into the dial app. All you needed to do was hit dial. Very convenient… When we were young little shits we would print qrcodes containing the android factory reset dial codes because those didn’t need hitting dial to trigger.