gedaliyah
@gedaliyah@lemmy.world
- Comment on Harsh 2 days ago:
“If you miss, you end up among the stars.”
OH DEAR LORD WE ARE OUT OF FUEL AND OXYGEN IT’S SO COLD SO COLD
- Comment on When a person gains weight and keeps the weight on for a long time, is that old fat in your body, or does the fat get replaced over time? 5 days ago:
The number of fat cells don’t really change in your body. The individual cells grow and shrink.
- Submitted 1 week ago to videos@lemmy.world | 4 comments
- Comment on Why are podcasters/vloggers suddenly holding tiny mics? 1 week ago:
- Comment on Works every time 1 week ago:
Do I have to ask them? Can I just wait to see if they bring it up? Or at least text them?
- Comment on 1 week ago:
The Appalachian Trail is about 2000 miles and a lot if people walk that. Worth a Google search. There are documentaries, memoirs, plenty of before/after photos, etc.
- Comment on Who the fuck needs an x axis anyway 2 weeks ago:
Also remember that we only had diagnostic tools for adult autism beginning in the 1980s.
The rise of autism diagnosis does not necessarily equal a rise in autism.
- Comment on Who the fuck needs an x axis anyway 2 weeks ago:
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
- Comment on [META] Community discussion regarding AI & clickbait 2 weeks ago:
Oops, fair enough!
- Comment on How do you introduce the Fediverse to other people? 2 weeks ago:
It’s also a good idea to share content without additional context whenever possible. Just send them a link to an interesting post. The more people get used to seeing interesting content on Lemmy, Masto, etc., the more likely they are to think it’s not “weird” and maybe make an account to comment on something.
- Comment on How do you introduce the Fediverse to other people? 2 weeks ago:
“Imagine if social media were run by the people who use it instead of corporations selling ads through engagement at all costs.”
- Comment on [META] Community discussion regarding AI & clickbait 2 weeks ago:
I’m not sure if this helps but there is an extension called DeArrow which automatically fixes obnoxious titles and thumbnails. There may be a way to use that in this community, ask users to refer to it when necessary.
- Comment on I baked eye ball cookies for Halloween 2 weeks ago:
You used too much milk
- Comment on Mom!!!! Can we pls??? 3 weeks ago:
“No, honey we have superfluids at home.”
The superfluid at home: A grainy still image of superfluid helium
- Comment on I AM NOT A TOY 3 weeks ago:
It’s not even October yet
- Comment on No thanks 3 weeks ago:
Cmon bro, just one more datum. That’s all we need. One little piece of data and that’s it. Cmon, please?
- Comment on Confidence 5 weeks ago:
Humans are just off-brand octopuses.
- Comment on No brainer 5 weeks ago:
“Doctor, please help me! I have a terrible pain in my side.”
“It’s just gas. Trust me.”
- Comment on No brainer 5 weeks ago:
Seeing inside empty containers is way more useful than it seems.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Yes, it depends a lot on the jurisdiction where you live. In general where permitted, it involves a process of legally establishing your wishes, receiving qualified counseling, and then obtaining the “means” to use according to your designated plan.
- Comment on Title 1 month ago:
- Comment on YOU HAVE NO POWER HERE 1 month ago:
✅ Discount number of limbs
✅ Cheaply made eyeballs
✅ Held together with a bunch of inflexible bones
Wait, am I just an off-band octopus?
Damn.
- Comment on Ready or not! 1 month ago:
“Delicious.”
- Comment on Now I finally get it 1 month ago:
The word ילד would be insufficient. It does not include נער, or עלם, which would be the more likely scenario (not to mention עול, which would be unthinkable). זכר is the more obvious choice.
- Comment on Now I finally get it 1 month ago:
No, you are correct.
If it meant men, it would use the same word twice (like the mediocre translation above). It specifically uses a different word to indicate a different meaning. איש at the beginning of the verse, and זכר in the second part of the verse.
Legitimate scholars all agree that this is not referring to the type of gay relationships that generally exist today. They disagree only with the exact meaning that was intended.
- Comment on Debatable 1 month ago:
The debate: can a high-and-tight also have bangs
- Comment on Incident 1 month ago:
I can’t be completely surprised that Miss Emely has trouble with spelling.
- Comment on Incident 1 month ago:
- Submitted 1 month ago to [deleted] | 43 comments
- Comment on Vibe check! 1 month ago:
Beer in a top hat for me
