Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Maybe AI won't be taking all of our jobs after all?

⁨1418⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨FlyingSquid@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44220be6-b2b8-486e-bc02-b81220d0e5ea.jpeg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Adequately_Insane@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If I had a penny for every “this new stuff will never work” and then it did, I could probably afford nice dinner.

    source
    • cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Maybe a nice cake for dessert too, with an extra dollop of fear.

      source
      • Shadywack@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        And butger frosting

        source
    • DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      “Everything that can be invented has been invented” - Charles H. Duell, 1899.

      [the origins of that quote are a bit sketchy but I’ll just ignore that cause its a funny quote]

      source
    • Shadywack@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I can say something similar, if I had a penny for every time the next big thing was pronounced and hyped, but didn’t take off, I could probably afford a Rivian.

      source
      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        All I can think of is the segway.

        source
    • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This “ai” isn’t going away, there’s too much profit to chase and corporate knows it.

      source
      • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I mean it’s not even new. The last decade we mostly just called it machine learning and this type of work has been going on longer than that. It only feels new because we’re putting generative tools in people’s hands. It’s already proven itself, it’s already replacing jobs.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • net00@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    egs

    source
  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Demiicious

    source
  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    ah yes, using a highly specialized AI intended for image generation to create something that is usually in text form. truly a good judge of the quality of AI…

    source
    • ilikecoffee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Who said literally anything about Dall-e’s quality? We’re just laughing at the results because they’re funny.

      source
      • TheBurlapBandit@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        "Maybe AI won't be taking all of our jobs after all?"

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Rolldach@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As far as I see it, the AI decided to label the ingredients

      source
    • Downcount@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Only an AI would say this.

      source
  • sour@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    tofu

    source
  • Default_Defect@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Some tech bro will attempt to make this cake and will tell someone it was better than anything some uppity WOKE human baker could have made, regardless of how bad it turned out.

    source
    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You can literally taste the fear.

      source
  • bappity@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    butger

    source
  • Cannacheques@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Turns out that AI can’t make cakes or do recipes lol

    source
    • nyoooom@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      ChatGPT can totally make a cake recipe tho, without even telling you about how their great uncle used to make that recipe when they would come back for holidays

      source
    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      No, Dall-e 3, an AI known for creating brilliant pictures, but isn’t trained on general intelligence nor cooking, is the one creating bad recipes.

      source
      • Cannacheques@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Is stable diffusion still around?

        source
  • Slartibartfass@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Safran macht den Kuchen gehl

    source
  • Stormygeddon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Everything is labeled butter except the butter. I feel that there is an “I can’t believe it’s not butter” joke in there.

    source
  • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    My spouse is now mocking me because I giggled in front of a picture of ingredients. “Ooooh funny… ingredients… oh … oh … oh…”

    source
  • OpenStars@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You can use an electric beater instead of a wire whisk. It makes it extra chewy. :-P

    source
    • Hotdogman@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Electric potper

      source
      • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        You can’t use the electric potper if you’re using egs.

        source
  • mechoman444@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Vedk is something my grandmother used to add into her pound cake when I was a kid. Really set itself apart from the rest!

    source
  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This looks like the Dr. Seuss on an acid trip cake recipe.

    source
  • Tetsuo@jlai.lu ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    No melk :(

    source
    • Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      *Cries in Dutch*

      source
    • Nacktmull@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Even worse, no malk!

      source
      • MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        no malk!

        de Koijn?

        source
  • I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This seems hella fake. These are not the kind of errors AI generators make.

    source
    • Lennnny@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Nah it’s really bad at labeled diagrams. It knows what words to put on, and now to make it look good, but it doesn’t know how to actually map things well.

      Here’s an image with the prompt “old lady’s bungalow”

      source
      • Orbituary@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Don’t you mean “Bungadlon?”

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Grass@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I haven’t been able to get it to print labels on each thing like that, but dall-e definitely has difficulty spelling, or even using real letters. Sometimes when I don’t even ask for text it just prints part of the prompt somewhere in the image in the style of a live laugh love decal, but with at least one word spelled wrong or corrupted.

      source
    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s really funny but I share your skepticism. At least the labels appear to be edited in after the fact, they’re way too clear and similar and not messy enough to be real, unless there’s something new with DallE-3 I guess.

      source
      • Serdan@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Dalle 3 is quite good at text

        source
  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    vedk, miilk. Sounds like an IKEA inspired cake to me

    source
  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
                       IIIIIIILK
           IIIIIIII
     IIIIII
MIIII

    Oh yes, Omega Mart Milk

    source
  • Shadywack@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You pass butter!

    Oh my god…

    Yeah welcome to the club

    source
    • rustbuckett@lemmings.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I think you mean butger.

      source
  • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    So many jokes. Including:

    …Around the corner fudge is made!

    …And sediment shaped sediment.

    source
  • KredeSeraf@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That egg is going to birth some cosmic horror nonsense.

    source
  • xptiger@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    not yet right now,

    hilarious by those outputs.

    But still, sooner maybe, as long as AI keeps learning and improving and advancing, it may come true sadly.

    source
    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I think LLMs will be fundamentally unable to do certain things because of how they function. They’re only as good as what they’re trained on, and with how fast and loose companies have been with that, they’ll have formed patterns based on incorrect information.

      Fundamentally, it doesn’t know what it generates. If I ask for a citation, it’ll likely give me a result that seems legit, but doesn’t actually exist.

      source
    • jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      There are certain ways in which the AI seems to plateau short of the desired usefulness in some ways. If the output is supposed to be verbatim specific to the point a machine could consume it, it tends to have these sorts of mistakes. It shines at doing a better job in ingesting direction and data that is ‘messy’ and processing it and spitting it back at a human for a human to similarly have to be capable of correcting ‘messy’ input, though with it doing a lot of the heavy lifting to be influenced by more data.

      This is a huge chunk of huge utility, but for very specific things and things that really require expertise, there seems to be an enduring need for human review. However, the volume of people needed may be dramatically reduced.

      Similar to other areas of computing. Back in the 1930s, an animated film might take 1500 to make it happen. Now fewer than a tenth of that could easily turn out better quality with all the computer assistance. We’ve grown our ambitions and to make a similarly ‘blockbuster’ scale production which is insanely more detailed and thoroughly animated we still are talking about less than half the staff.

      It seems that AI will be another step in that direction of reducing required staff to acheive better than current expectations, but not entirely displacing them. Becomes extra challenging, since the impacts may be felt across so many industries all at once, with no clear area to soak up the potential reduced labor demand.

      source
  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    A dash of potper will spice up any dish

    source
  • SwellowTheSun@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Sugar and butter and flour and mother

    source