mechoman444
@mechoman444@lemmy.world
I am live.
- Comment on Man on a mission 2 weeks ago:
I don’t think you even know what those words mean. 😂
There is nothing more dangerous than a stupid person who thinks they’re smart.
- Comment on Man on a mission 2 weeks ago:
I don’t think anyone really likes you. I imagine you serve some function in society, so people who work with you tolerate you to some extent. But like you? I doubt it very much.
And this whole “incel” narrative you’re pulling out of thin air is genuinely impressive in its absurdity. Please, I encourage you to continue digging your own sexist hole.
There’s nothing strange about this exchange, you’re just not used to someone calling you out directly. I assume you’re more accustomed to surrounding yourself with yes-men… or yes-women. Yes-people? I’m not sure.
Maybe in another life you would have fit right in with figures like Putin… or Trump.
- Comment on Man on a mission 2 weeks ago:
You have a very clear and consistent pattern in your responses. I’m not going to dig through your comments again to pull specific examples of where you opposed the porn ban.
My point is your hypocrisy, it’s been consistent from your very first comment in this exchange.
You repeatedly place blame on men for a wide range of issues, while going out of your way to emphasize that you’re not from the United States. Then you pivot into ongoing gender-based talking points, which come across as an attempt to justify what is, frankly, a weak position. There are more women than men globally, yet you still default to framing men as the problem in nearly every context.
Which brings us back to the core issue: people generally don’t like you.
More importantly, it seems like you intentionally provoke these kinds of exchanges because you enjoy this type of discourse.
Another user called you insufferable. I agree.
- Comment on Man on a mission 2 weeks ago:
Right. But you do care about other things like them banning step-bro porn in the UK. That is something you’re apparently ok with.
So which is it? When they’re against something they’re good but if they’re doing something you don’t like they’re libs?
You do realize that the same people banning the porn that you dislike are the same people that don’t like transgenders either.
- Comment on Man on a mission 2 weeks ago:
I’m pretty sure if we took a look at all the people down voting you some of them will be women. (Or any other gender other than men)
- Comment on Man on a mission 2 weeks ago:
No no. This is why people don’t like you.
- Comment on Big if true 🚨 3 weeks ago:
And it will be available on steam!
- Comment on Wake up sheeple 3 weeks ago:
It’s not just Americanas. Many prominent flat Earthers come out of England.
- Comment on How come some Corporation or some Business don't sponsor a protest? Like McDonald's sponsoring that No Kings protest. Or a hotel giving free room and board to protestors and so on? 3 weeks ago:
Large brands, like MacDonalds, avoid controversy because their business model depends on appealing to the widest possible audience. Their goal is to keep people consuming whether that means buying products, eating, or staying at their establishments.
Supporting movements like “No Kings” or any form of protest risks alienating a significant portion of potential customers.
There is no upside to taking a stance. Only risk to the bottom line.
- Comment on No bitey my horsey [TW: a spöder eating dinner] 3 weeks ago:
Not the first time spider got a free meal from op!
Spider: thanks bro! 🫡
- Comment on Wimp Lo Trump 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on average red state university 3 weeks ago:
Ya. That doesn’t work either. What does work is doing the exact same thing they do. Get a sign write on it “Christianity is bullshit. Prove me wrong” and stand there.
Don’t look at him, don’t engage. When he does finally say something tell him that he’s oppressing your beliefs and he deserves to burn in everlasting hellfire…
- Comment on Why is 'Philippines' spelled with a PH, but 'Filipino' is spelled with an F? 4 weeks ago:
Exactly!
- Comment on Why is 'Philippines' spelled with a PH, but 'Filipino' is spelled with an F? 4 weeks ago:
Because the English language is rife with tradition that makes the language intentionally more complicated.
I have postulated for years that you can just get rid of ph from the language entirely and it will make absolutely no difference in how we say the words.
- Comment on Zen 5 weeks ago:
Great movie btw.
- Comment on 7 words you can’t say, then and now 5 weeks ago:
Apparently just not right now.
- Comment on WHERE THE FUCK IS THE CURSOR? 1 month ago:
spamming ctrl
- Comment on If you found out your cousin was a billionaire (non-famous) and the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, how would you react? Would you be mad he didn’t tell you? 1 month ago:
Exactly. I totally agree.
I think a really good way to avoid crap like this is to make a rule not allowing hypotheticals on the sub.
- Comment on If you found out your cousin was a billionaire (non-famous) and the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, how would you react? Would you be mad he didn’t tell you? 1 month ago:
No, as a matter of fact, the subject of this particular post fits the sub exactly. It is a stupid question.
It is incredibly stupid. There is no real way to answer it, and any answer would be superficial because it is such a massive hypothetical that the answer itself does not actually matter.
Although, as stated above, it technically fits the sub, it violates the spirit of what this is supposed to be.
- Comment on If you found out your cousin was a billionaire (non-famous) and the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, how would you react? Would you be mad he didn’t tell you? 1 month ago:
This sub needs better moderation.
- Comment on where? 1 month ago:
That is the only clear choice.
- Comment on The difference is real 1 month ago:
It is incredible to me how they’re willing to bend and break so many rules and laws of this country, including the most fundamental tenets of our constitution. But indicting the president is the one thing they’re not going to do. That’s the one law that is sacred above all else.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 month ago:
Correct… 🧐
- Comment on IYKYK 1 month ago:
The reason I responded at all was because I looked up what he was talking about because anytime someone makes a wild claim supported by a poor source it tends to raise a few red flags.
I don’t mince words and I don’t play it soft.
It is a clear sign of the times when clear pushback on a wild ass claim is met with “your comment is so extreme.” It should be so as to ensure the validity of what I’m trying to say.
If there was more “extreme” out there my country wouldn’t be the utter maga shit hole it is now.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 month ago:
In addition to my first comment response.
What you’re calling “extreme” is simply direct pushback without the usual padding people have come to expect. That padding, hedging, soft language, pretending both sides might have a point, is exactly why misinformation keeps spreading unchecked. It creates the illusion that facts are negotiable.
Now, if the goal is to gently reassure everyone and avoid discomfort, then yes, a softer tone would be more appropriate. But that approach routinely fails to correct anything. It prioritizes feelings over accuracy.
If the goal is to actually challenge bad information in a way that’s unambiguous and difficult to misinterpret, then a firmer tone is not only justified, it’s necessary. You don’t have to like the delivery. But dismissing it as “extreme” avoids engaging with the actual issue, whether the claim being challenged holds up. If it doesn’t, then tone becomes a secondary concern.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 month ago:
Every single retail store in the known first world does this. They have cameras in their stores that record video and audio. They collate data about sales and if you have an account they’ll link it to your name.
I don’t know what part of the world you’re from but here in the states we have a chain called Kroger and if you want discounts you got to put your phone number into their system. That tracks everything that you do for marketing purposes.
This has been going on since the dawn of retail.
What the person above is describing isn’t that.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 month ago:
You’re mixing a real issue with a bunch of claims you can’t back up.
Yes, Home Depot uses Flock ALPR cameras. That part is true. They scan license plates and log vehicles in parking lots. And yes, that data can be shared with local law enforcement. That’s all documented.
But “tracking you” like some kind of live surveillance grid? Not really. It’s point-in-time plate reads. It can be aggregated into movement patterns, which is where the privacy concern actually exists, but that’s not the same thing as constant tracking.
Now the bigger problem, where are you getting that they “sell the data to advertisers or highest bidders”? There’s no credible reporting supporting that. Flock’s entire business model is selling the system and access, not dumping raw data on the open market. If you have a source, post it.
Same with “given to cops and feds for free.” It’s not that simple. Local police can access or integrate with these systems, sure. And federal agencies might get data indirectly through them. But that’s very different from Home Depot just handing it out freely to anyone with a badge.
So yeah, there’s a legitimate surveillance concern here. But when you start throwing in unsupported claims, it just weakens the argument. If you’ve got actual sources for the “advertisers” or “highest bidders” part, let’s see them. Otherwise, you’re overstating it.
What the privacy statement actually says
Where Do We Collect It From?
Directly from you or the devices you use to access digital services, such as websites, mobile applications, and applications for connected devices.
Other customers that may provide us with your information to recommend a product or service, ship products to you, or list you as a recipient of products or services.
Companies that provide services on our behalf (e.g., installers and others that may communicate with you about products or projects).
Security and fraud prevention services that help us confirm that transactions are valid and otherwise help us protect our assets and you.
Marketing companies that help us learn about our customers and the devices they use to access digital content.
Companies that supplement our customer records with additional information.
Shipping providers that update address information.
Social media platforms.
Advertising companies and content publishers that present you with our ads.
Payment and transaction processors.
Communications and mailing vendors.
The signals emitted by your mobile devices when you travel through our stores
I don’t like you or what you do. I’ve seen your posts before, and you keep making declarative claims backed by weak sources that don’t actually explain anything. On top of that, you’re clearly making things up and framing it as some grand conspiracy about people being tracked.
Yes, tracking exists to a degree, but you strip out all nuance and turn it into fear-mongering. It’s not useful, it’s not informative, and it’s not a service to anyone. Just stop.
- Comment on If I were to go out steal 34 cars. And charged with 34 felonies. One per each car. Could I not use the presidents case in defense of my own? Why or why not? 1 month ago:
You’re right, I was overgeneralizing.
I assumed most legal systems relied on precedent, but that’s not accurate globally. The majority of countries follow civil law systems, like France and Germany, where precedent isn’t binding in the same way.
Where I was coming from is that many of the largest and most economically influential countries like the United States, United Kingdom, and India do use precedent-based systems, which probably skewed my perception. So yeah, globally I was wrong, but I can see why I thought that.
- Comment on If I were to go out steal 34 cars. And charged with 34 felonies. One per each car. Could I not use the presidents case in defense of my own? Why or why not? 1 month ago:
Your argument and answer: U.S. law, and most other modern judicial systems, rely on something called precedent. If a judge makes a ruling that creates such precedent, another judge handling a similar case cannot simply ignore it.
There was no new ruling in any of the cases Donald Trump was involved in; therefore, no new precedent was established.
When it comes to sentencing, a judge can and oftentimes does, have leeway to impose punishment as leniently or as harshly as they see fit.
If you commit a crime and are convicted, you could argue at sentencing that, since Trump received leniency, you should also receive a similarly light sentence. Unfortunately when it comes to sentencing a court is not obligated to take into consideration how other criminals were sentenced.
- Comment on Why are public school teachers so underpaid in the US? 1 month ago:
Simple. Education isn’t the goal. The US doesn’t need well informed and educated people. They need drones that’ll follow orders from the oligarchs.
They need workers ok with $7.25 an hour. Work 6 days a week then church on Sunday.
