No idea why he thinks anyone will side with him on this. At least the 30% cut thing had some reason behind it no matter how thin.
idk
Submitted 2 hours ago by io@piefed.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
https://piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone/posts/WV/3R/WV3RkfP2bmtKFQy.webp
Comments
xbloodymajor@reddthat.com 2 hours ago
marighost@piefed.social 1 hour ago
The only people who will side with him are c-suite dipshits protecting corporate interests and AI/Tech bros lacking a grip on reality. Fuck you, Sweeney, you piece of shit.
fonix232@fedia.io 7 minutes ago
I'm generally pro-AI but I still think the disclosure is nice to have and should not be removed.
People have a right to informed decisions. If they want a product that had "no AI" in its making (although let's be honest, a game might not contain AI generated audiovisual assets, but a form of AI, even generative AI, is almost guaranteed to have been used during the creation of the game), they can vote with their wallets.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 hour ago
Rich guy doing rich guy things. They never expect reality to catch up with them until it does 🤷
markz@suppo.fi 49 minutes ago
So basically Tim Epic just wants to lie to consumers?
Epzillon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
Context?
belluck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
Epic Games CEO wants Steam to remove AI disclosures
Mim@lemmy.zip 5 minutes ago
Hahaha, dey gave da git da wrong finkin kap!