And they expect you to do this for free?
Dreams come true
Submitted 7 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/68d71476-298c-4cc9-8de8-295c0f9c6ee6.jpeg
Comments
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 months ago
Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
thejml@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Nah, they get “Exposure”!
/s
Rolando@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
For profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
And yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 7 months ago
[deleted]Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
Maybe check the other comments.
Granite@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Feed the LLM with LLM generated books. No resentment at all!
gibmiser@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Jfc that’s gross
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
Honestly sometimes I feel like I’m the only one on Lemmy who likes AI
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 7 months ago
AI absolutely has its benefits, but it’s impossible to deny the ethical dilemma in forcing writers to feed their work to a machine that will end up churning out a half assed version that also likely has some misinformation in it.
Jaderick@lemmy.world 7 months ago
And will likely take their professions
coffee_whatever@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Remember! It’s not AI hallucinations, it’s simply bullshit!
lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 months ago
AI as a technology is fascinating and can be extremely useful, especially in places like the medical field. AI as a product in its current state is nothing more than dystopian plagiarism.
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 months ago
The company I work for recently rolled up copilot and is have been a mixed bag of reactions, the less savvy user were first blowed up by the demonstration but then got exasperated when it didn’t worked as they tough (one of them uploaded an excel file and asked to some analysis it couldn’t do, and came to me to complain about it), but for me, and my team had worked great. I’ve been uploading some of my python and SQL scripts and asking for refactoring and adding comments, or uploading my SQL script and some example I found on stackoverflow and asking for it to apply the example method on my script.
I said to everyone that if they don’t know shit, the AI isn’t not going to help a lot, but if you have at least the basic, the AI would help you a lot.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
even just on simple stuff I asked it to generate a description on something like
if x then set z to null
and it returned
“this will set z to null if x is true or false”
like easy to edit, but you have to pay attention.
AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 7 months ago
I like AI. But I’m not sure I like the way we use it if it’s only to meet shareholders’ expectations or to be a tool for greedy people. What is your opinion concerning the way we seem to use AI in academic research?
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
Found the black and white only guy.
Etterra@lemmy.world 7 months ago
So what you’re saying is, don’t beat the targets because fuck those guys. Understood.
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Soylent Green is a lie anyway. Your need to “soylentify” half they population to feed the other half every year if it would be there only source of calories.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 months ago
No, the point is that they’re just recycling the dissidents they were going to murder anyway.
AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de 7 months ago
What’s the academic terminology for “go pound sand”?
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
How many of these books will just be totally garbage nonsense just so they could fulfill a rearranged quota.
Now the LLM are filled with a good amount of nonsense.
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 7 months ago
Just use the llm to make the books that the llm then uses, what could go wrong?
runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 months ago
Someone’s probably already coined the term, but I’m going to call it LLM inbreeding.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 months ago
It can only go right because corporations must be punished for trying to replace people with machines.
poplargrove@lemmy.world 7 months ago
That would be terrible because they are both some of the best academic publishers in the humanities.