The technology was created to replace voice actors. That’s the actual purpose. Its very existence hurts their profession and benefits studios. You can not be a studio, use this technology, and claim to care about ethics, anymore than Amazon can claim to care about the workers as it invests in the machines to replace them.
It doesn’t matter if you compensate or get their approval, because the fact is the existence of the technology in the industry effectively compels all voice actors to agree to let it use their voice, or they can’t get work. It becomes a false choice.
If there was no financial benefit, if it truly made no difference in how much a studio pays in labor or the amount the artists make, there would be no reason for studios to want to use it.
Blaster_M@lemmy.world 5 months ago
While everyone here is screeching about jerbs, I would like to point out that using AI voices to voice an AI is an artistic genius in itself.
Stamau123@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Yeah it’s real luddite hours here
“How will voicebot 2.0 pay for his child’s oil now?”
trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Are you an idiot?
People are worried about the actual voice actors who voice act the characters.
Do you think GLaDOS was voiced by a potato battery?
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 5 months ago
The Luddites ruled actually:
It’s remarkably apropos to the use of AI to make an obviousoy inferior product, but apparently you think it’s an insult.