Why do we use the term Ban when it's temporary? Why not the more accurate, Suspension?

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Steve@communick.news⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

To my mind, Ban has always meant permanent.
“You’re banned from this place! You’ll never be allowed in again!”

While I’ve always thought of Suspend as being temporary.
“You’re being suspended from school for 1 week, over fighting.”

Ban:

to prohibit especially by legal means
bar entry

Suspend:

to debar temporarily especially from a privilege, office, or function
a: to cause to stop temporarily
b: to set aside or make temporarily inoperative
to defer to a later time on specified conditions
to hold in an undetermined or undecided state awaiting further information

When I hear someone mention they were banned my reaction is: “Holy shit! WTF did you do to earn that!” Then I find out it was only for a day or three: “Oh… That’s not a Ban! That’s minor. Go touch grass. You’ll be fine.”

I’ve been banned from subreddits and communities a few times. At least once I never even noticed because it was so short.

How is it a Ban if I didn’t even notice?

Why did Ban in online forums and games, come to mean temporary?

Is it simply an example of the intensification of language? To make something mundane, seem more severe than it is?

Does it bother anyone else? Or am I alone here?

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Your definitions seem to explain it already.

A ban bars you from entry into a space. A temporary ban temporarily bars you from entry into a space. A Lemmy community in this instance is the space you are being barred from entering.

Either way you have been barred from entry, just some are short term, not all are permanent.

I think it is just semantics and you are overthinking it.

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  But the word for a temporary ban, is suspend, not ban.
  Every time I hear about a ban, I have to take a moment and remind myself and ask: “Do they mean ban or suspend?”
  
  It’s annoying. I’m hoping there’s a good reason for it.
  
  source
  - conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    They’re not synonymous.
    
    You don’t suspend a customer from a bar, temporarily or permanently. Suspension implies membership, or access being limited. Your membership to a club can be suspended. Your access to Walmart can’t be. You’re banned from the store, whether for a year or a lifetime. As there’s no barrier to entry, it doesn’t make sense to suspend the privilege of access.
    
    This is all ignoring that banning a person from a limited access club is also perfectly fine, because the definition of ban is applicable either way. There aren’t really many situations where suspension would be valid but ban wouldn’t. Maybe some small subset of privileges could be suspended where “ban” is a little weird, because general access is still permitted.
    
    But temporary ban makes perfect sense. (Ignoring that it’s been standard terminology for 30 years.)
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - can@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I’ve been temporarily banned in real life before. I had a sip of a friend’s drink at the campus bar while I was underage and they banned me for a year.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    A lot of bans are permanent. The word is used inclusively. At the moment you are banning someone, you may not especially care to reassure them it will only be temporary. No, it doesn’t bother me as it seems to bother you.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
kambusha@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Probably because “Ban” is shorter & easier to write

source
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Net terminology just changed over time.

It used to be, both in games and on forums, that a ‘ban’ typically implied that it was permanent, or for a considerable amount of time, like multiple weeks or a month or more, or until removed from a banlist.

If a ban was temporary, it would be qualified by clarifying that it was a temporary ban.

Otherwise, just using ‘ban’ almost always meant a permanent ban.

A ‘kick’, on the other hand, usually meant direct ejection from a game in the moment, and maybe 15 or 30 minutes of inability to rejoin, or an inability to rejoin that temporary session… though the terminology varied more from forum to forum.

Likewise, ‘pm’ (private message) became ‘dm’ (direct message).

‘Mods’ / ‘Modding’ / ‘Modder’, as in game mods, used to exclusively mean that you (and others, in a multiplayer game) were using or creating additional community content that altered game mechanics, almost always in a constructive way that added to the game experience for everyone.

‘Warez’ / ‘Cheats’ / ‘Hacks’ used to specifically refer to … things that are arguably, technically ‘Mods’, but manipulate your experience of the game to give you a (theoretically) covert series of advantages over the game such that competiton is now blatantly unfair.

Those terms are still used to mean that… but, as less and less games support modding, and more and more switched away from having server browsers to just having a ‘find match’ button… with a whole lot of those kinds of games, ‘Modding’ now just means cheating or hacking.

If you got to a GTA V game or community and say ‘I’m a modder’ they will interperet that as ‘I am a cheater’, not ‘I make and have made mods for one or many PC games.’

… All of these newer uses of the terms are still ‘correct’ in the sense that you can justify the meanings of the newer terms…

… but a lot of zoomers / casuals have little to no understanding of how the terminology changes are confusing to an older gamer who finds themselves in a community of younger folks.

source
- rappo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  You’ve got “Warez” wrong, it’s explicitly (and always has been) pirated software.
  
  source
  - sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Derp, you’re correct.
    
    source
- Kelly@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Amazing write up!
  
  Likewise, ‘pm’ (private message) became ‘dm’ (direct message).
  
  I’m pretty sure Discord is entirely responsible for that.
  
  They started calling private chats ‘direct messages’ even though basically every forum or what have you up till Discord called them ‘private chats’ or ‘private messages’.
  
  Twitter was calling them DMs in 2013, this was probably influencing the language while Discord was being designed ahead of its 2015 launch.
  
  source
  - sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Ah!
    
    I did not know that, as I have always despised, and never used Twitter.
    
    source
  - SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    They started calling them Direct Messages since they aren’t actually “private.” It was about false advertising, it’s not actually a private message, it isn’t encrypted.
    
    No one wanted a court case thrown at them where “private messages” were supposed to be private. They took private out of the name to protect themselves legally since there is nothing private about a direct message.
    
    source
- Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I’ve always felt like “ban” is more like a manual operarion, you’re banned until someone manually unbans you. While a kick or suspension expires on its own.
  
  source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Thank you! Your thorough and thoughtful response is a breath of fresh air.
  
  source
  - sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Autistic elder gamer (I’m 35 rofl) at your service lol.
    
    I reformatted my post and added a bit to it.
    
    But yeah… its not that the newer terms / usage of terms is like, objectively incorrect.
    
    It is that language is actually nowhere near as objective and unchanging as most people seem to think, and words have a whole bunch of connotations and implied meanings that most people don’t even realize they are taking for granted.
    
    source
gedaliyah@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
We also use “Block” when it’s really mute.

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Sort of. I thought that for a long time also, because that’s the way reddit worked for years.
  But some people didn’t like that people they blocked could still see and comment on their stuff without their knowledge. So it became a real block.
  
  source
GetOffMyLan@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Nothing in the definition of ban says it has to be permanent.

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Nothing implies it’s anything other than permanent. While Suspend explicitly defines itself as a temporary Ban.
  
  source
  - BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    No, it doesn’t imply anything, you’re inferring.
    
    Definitions are written to be clear. Anything beyond that is the reader’s inference.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
The difference between ban and suspend isn’t a temporal difference. Here’s the Cambridge dictionary definition of “suspend”:

to stop something from being active, either temporarily or permanently (see: dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/…/suspend)

Here’s the definition for “ban”:

to forbid (= refuse to allow) something, especially officially (see dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ban?q…)

The difference between the two is the subject: an active process or service can be suspended, but something specific (e.g. an action, object or person) can be banned. Ban also implies a more official act in order to punish someone or prevent something (Johnny was banned from entering the bus), whereas a suspension doesn’t necessarily have that ‘negative’ context (e.g. the bus service was suspended, which doesn’t imply this happened because the bus driver was drunk or something).

In a more Lemmy-specific context, you could say you suspended someone’s access to the platform, or that you banned them from the platform. Neither way of saying it implies anything about the duration. You can’t however really say you suspended someone from the platform, that doesn’t really work.

In this context, I think the direct implication that a ban is handed out because someone did something bad is a lot clearer than when you use the word suspension. Because of that I believe ban to be the more context-appropriate word here. Suspend does not carry that connotation as something can be suspended for a whole host of reasons, none of which have to be related to rule-breaking. For example, federation with another instance could be suspended temporarily until the other instance does (or doesn’t do) something that is required for technical reasons.

source
blackbelt352@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Online there’s basically 3 levels of ban, temp ban, ban, and permaban.

Temp ban, the offender is not allowed to interact temporarily usually for a set amount of time before its automatically lifted, they get put in timeout for a bit.

Ban, more permanent sibling of the temp ban, doesn’t automatically lift after a set amount of time, can be lifted manually by admin/mods, usually leaves one possible channel of comms open for the offender to make appeals to the admins/mods. They’ve been kicked out of the bar, they’re not allowed back, but maybe in a while management will soften their stance.

Permaban, you do not pass go, you do not collect 200, you’re permanently gone, no take backs, these are basically never undone and basically no one except for the highest level of admins can undo it. You dun fucked up, the bar’s management is beyond pissed at you and you will never ever be back again, bouncers have your photo and it is damn near on sight with them.

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  
  most people conflate temp ban and regular ban.
  
  Which is why I’m implying (and now flatly saying) a Temp Ban should be renamed to a Suspension. For clarity.
  
  source
  - blackbelt352@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    And what’s to stop people from still saying “I got banned” even when it’s called a suspension?
    
    This feels a lot like the “We have 15 different cable standards, let’s make a universal one!” creates new cable standard “We have 16 different cable standards now…” situation.
    
    Even if the language we currently use is slightly ambiguous, one or two questions clears up the ambiguity and still gets across the idea of “I can’t post right now.” And comparatively asking an extra question sounds a lot easier than reworking something culturally ingrained in our lexicon.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - xmunk@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I agree and in most services a temporary restriction of an account is called a suspension (though colloquially terms like “3 day ban” have become common).
    
    Banning usually involves deleting or locking the user out of the account in an irrevocable manner.
    
    source
Slotos@feddit.nl ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
“Permaban” is the word you’re looking for.

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I’m pretty sure Permaban only exists because people started using Ban as temporary.
  Permaban is redundant.
  
  source
kitnaht@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I dunno, I’m with you on this OP. Ban implies permanency, suspension implies temporary.

source
lemonmelon@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
A ban is imposed on a person or an action. It can be rescinded at any time, but remains in place until it is explicitly rescinded. An expiration can be included in the terms of the ban, which automatically rescinds the ban after a set duration. The base definition of “ban” implies nothing about duration. Without clarification, any assumption regarding duration is baseless. Such clarification can be direct, such as including a clear statement of the period for which the ban is in place during the issuance of the ban, or indirect, such as context clues regarding the severity of the infraction that led to the ban being issued.

A suspension is placed upon statuses, privileges, credentials, or the like. Suspension is, by nature, a transitory state. Examples include being suspended from a job pending investigation of behavior, having one’s club membership suspended until club dues are brought current, or having one’s login credentials suspended while one’s account appears to be compromised. The transitory nature of a suspension implies that it resolves upon completion (or inaction on) of a task related to the object of the suspension. Upon completion of the sub-task, status is either reinstated or terminated. In the previous examples: employment is terminated upon conclusion of an investigation that proves the employee acted inappropriately, club membership is reinstated once payment of the outstanding balance is verified, account credentials are reinstated with access limitations once the account owner proves they are in control of the account.

Suspension is a step along the path to termination or revocation, not to a ban. The two terms are not directly related in that way. There can be overlap, but they are not different degrees of the same concept.

source
Skates@feddit.nl ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

To my mind, Ban has always meant permanent.

Then explain perma-ban

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Perma-ban started being used because people began using Ban when meaning something temporary.
  
  source
Rentlar@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Ban just means you are not allowed to do something. You can add a qualifier to note how long it is but on its own, there is no implied timeframe. A permanent ban means it will not be lifted after a certain period of time.

A suspension means that you stop doing something but you could expect to restart. In most contexts this is on a temporary basis, but you can specify an “indefinite suspension”, which practically is the same as a permanent ban, but perhaps connotating greater chance to appeal it or some conditions that may occur at an indeterminate point that would lift the suspension.

source
- Steve@communick.news ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  
  there is no implied timeframe
  
  If it’s not implied that it ever ends, how long would it last? Forever seems the reasonable answer. And as far as I know that was the prevailing assumption until 20ish years ago. I’m asking how ant why that changed.
  
  source
  - Rentlar@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Right. Often times when something is banned, it is usually banned “until further notice” hence permanent or indeterminate length, but not always. It’s the qualifier that will specify whether a ban is temporary or not.
    
    The Prohibition Era was a time when alcohol was banned indefinitely, until it was repealed. Campfire bans generally are only during the season when the risk of fire is high or are disallowed during specific times of day, and those have been around for a while. Being grounded is a ban on going anywhere until a kid meets their parents’ wishes or after a certain time. Temporary parking restrictions for a special event or snow clearing have been around pre-internet and those are called parking bans. It’s not the ban itself that means permanent, even if there were a lot more uses of it meaning “until further notice”, than for a specific length. You could say that the usage of ban qualified with a specific time expiry is more common now than it did before, but I would argue it did exist in the past. Why that is, I could only guess.
    
    source
  - xmunk@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I think you misread their response. It’d be similar to ask “How long does a timeout last” - it depends on the time affixed to the state - timeouts have no inherently defined length.
    
    I think ban in the tech world was originally understood to be permanent - but in the real world ban has always had the flexibility to have an assigned term. As the internet has grown it seems that ban is gradually returning to being non-permanent though a lot of systems will still differentiate between a ban (permanent) and a suspension (temporary) - though, again, there are instances I’ve seen of “Account permanently Suspended.”
    
    source
    -> View More Comments