rappo
@rappo@lemmy.world
This is a remote user, information on this page may be incomplete. View at Source ↗
- Comment on If a game adds or changes content outside of extra add-ons like DLC (such as a free update) does that content have to be reviewed by ratings boards and risk changing the rating of the game? 10 months ago:
A few things:
- Many (most?) ratings these days are self-assessed by the developer/publisher.
- The review process has been heavily streamlined through IARC, so you can effectively get ESRB/PEGI/etc simultaneously. Governmental ratings (like GRAC in South Korea) still require you go through the government agency – but some stores like Epic or Oculus can effectively do this for you – and even then it’s still self-assessed.
- Some of the storefronts offer help with ratings, in a way doing what a publisher would do, if you self-publish. You take a quiz to determine ratings and ask questions before the rating boards even know you exist.
- Ratings boards don’t typically play the game. Sample screenshots and descriptions can be included in some submissions, especially if there’s a grey area or the submitter is inexperienced, but it’s often just apply and get your cert.
- Comment on Unity warns of likely layoffs following runtime fee decision 1 year ago:
HDRP will be coming to mobile
- Comment on If civilization continues to the year 9999, is the idea to go to year 10.000, or...? 1 year ago:
we should really update this to “After when some people thought Jesus was born but they fucked up by 4-6 years. Also why is there no year zero?”
AWSPTJWBBTFUB4YAWITNYZ doesn’t really roll off the tongue, though. Maybe it’s better if someone can translate that into Latin.