plot twist: it’s a Jenny Nicholson video
When somebody backs up their argument with a 90-minute video
Submitted 2 months ago by zarkanian@sh.itjust.works to memes@sopuli.xyz
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/da1b8ebe-b786-43fa-a2d9-6f4684c96327.jpeg
Comments
cerement@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
veroxii@aussie.zone 2 months ago
Fuck it, I’m in!
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I watched/listened to her rant about some Star Wars hotel that I didn’t know existed, while it existed, for 4 hours! Wish I had gone to Disneyland while she was a guide.
sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Sometimes I back up my argument with wntire books lmao. Its not usually for the person I am arguing with. Its for the people who see the argument and are curious
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
You should be able to explicate your own argument, though. “Read this book” isn’t convincing on its own.
sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Oh for sure, I don’t just say, “you’re wrong read this book” lol.
queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Yeah, you need to take specific portions of the book to support your argument. I won’t just say “read Fanon” but will give a a specific example from the book in addition to the more general example of the entire work, plus encourage them to read more.
dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 months ago
Einstein said if you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it.
Also drag likes your name.
kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Agree with that 100 % I have a degree in Philosophy and that’s a reoccurring dynamic I saw with people trying to baffle with bullshit rather than make a cogent argument
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I would’ve loved to hear him explain general relativity to an elementary school kid. No bowling ball on trampoline nonsense either!
morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Honestly such a power move
towerful@programming.dev 2 months ago
Just point to the dictionary. “Draw your own conclusions, bro”
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
This is my reaction anytime I Google virtually anything. Stop fucking recommending videos, Google. We’re not fucking interested.
Tja@programming.dev 2 months ago
You are not fucking interested. We, as Google’s customer base, want everything in video format because we are allergic to reading. If it pisses off 1% of users (which is ten of millions of people), so be it, still profit.
orcrist@lemm.ee 2 months ago
If only there were a way to search specifically for videos. That would be convenient.
vithigar@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I’m with you. This shift over the last decade or so to everything being in video essay format is infuriating. Especially when I’m trying to look up instructions for something that could just be a five item bulleted list or a single image but instead is stretched out into a ten minute video.
There have actually been a few times I’ve given up on finding some piece of information or instructions I wanted because I could only find video sources.
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 months ago
There are also the SEO sites, you search for how to write a file in python and you get 20 pages about file writing and why that is used, the history of python and more until you, maybe, get the simple one liner you forgot about.
And I use an ad blocker.
I know it’s so google thinks I’m enjoying myself on that site because I stay there “longer”, and thus thinks it’s a good site, but would it be so hard to have a search engine just straight out exclude large sites? I mean it does clearly not work well.
Fuck, exclude all “dynamic” ones too. Back to pure html! 😺
intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 months ago
A reference should contain a timestamp or a page number. That’s always been the standard for citations. You don’t just reference a book.
Also, whatever claim from the original material supports your argument should be quoted or paraphrased by you in your argument.
Citations aren’t the same as bibliography. A citation is just in case a person doesn’t trust your claim that “A said X”; they can follow your citation to check if that’s true.
Bibliography is further reading, if a person wants to know more about what you’re saying.
kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Oh hell yes! I also feel that people who can’t summarise their argument likely don’t understand it
intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Amen. That’s often what I say to them: if you can’t describe the argument you didn’t understand it.
Sabata11792@ani.social 2 months ago
Did we just discover a fundamental force of the internet?
db2@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s brutal.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 months ago
me when people say i’m not allowed to exist in a leftist space unless i’ve read all of these five books on theory cover to cover
Juice@midwest.social 2 months ago
As someone who has read those 5 books, and the next 5, and the next 5 and so on, those people never go away. I still recommend those books but in my experience they’re almost always in-group signalling and not coming up with a new synthesis of the material as understood through their own unique experiences as a worker. Actually those people will be the first to tell you that experience doesn’t matter its actually their experience reading books that matters.
“The traditions of dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the minds of the living.” is as true for the left as it is any other tradition.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Been there. Skimmed four fucking Youtube links. Reported back to explain in detail why the other guy was wrong about all of them. Didn’t work.
This is why enforced civility is a failure of moderation. People need the ability to say, “fuck off.” Not just “I strongly disagree and question your motives and blah blah blah.” We must be able to communicate: this is stupid, you’re being an asshole, polite consideration would be lending undue legitimacy.
Otherwise any stupid asshole can blather on about whatever and demand to be treated like they have a point. Mods who don’t remove those people pre-emptively don’t understand their role. Mods who actively protect those people are bastards.
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I love everthing about this.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 months ago
Perfect response.
someguy3@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I got a YouTube link to a 30 minute mumbler.
Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 months ago
This shit happens far too often. Between the YouTube links that “prove” their bullshit, to the thousand-word copypasta essay that doesn’t contain a single original thought.
Yeah. I’m not doing that.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Or, worse, the essay doesn’t support their argument at all. Because they didn’t actually read it in the first place.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’ve had people link articles to me for their argument that actually substantiated mine.
barsquid@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I see we have all independently encountered the same individuals.
HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
Your loss, you would just have to educate yourself on basic shit, here’s a short one for your attention span.
Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 months ago
You know links are shown in thumbnails, right?
MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Only video that’s ever made sense to me.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yeah that’s right, disregard the rock solid evidence they laid out!! /s
Wooki@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Professional whinging is so hard