Simpsons did it!
“Well, frankly, test scores like Larry’s would call for a very generous contribution. For example, a score of 400 would require a donation of new football uniforms, 300, a new dormitory, and in Larry’s case, we would need an international airport.”
RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’d be ok with anonymous donations if they were truly anonymous both publicly and to the management of the institution receiving the money.
Maybe this is something that the government could facilitate - pool these resources, then help distribute them where they are needed. Almost like how taxes work.
Maintains uncomfortable eye contact with the camera
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 months ago
If anyone is aware of the source, it’s not anonymous, it’s undisclosed.
MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Agreed, literal anonymous, way cool. Undisclosed, much less so.
abbadon420@lemm.ee 2 months ago
The tweet speaks of “dark money”. I like that term better. It feels worse
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
I work for a nonprofit and “anonymous donor” definitely means “c-suite folks know who it came from”
norimee@lemmy.world 2 months ago
This exactly. If you really want to stay anonymous then use a middleman and do it anonymous to the recipient as well.
Everyone involved with the institution, students, parents who pay tuition, teachers, authorities who financially support the institution (…) have a right to know in whose pocket they are.
rain_worl@lemmy.world 2 months ago
do like onion routing, use two middlemen, i guess you’d literally use locks, sorta like that encryption analogy
hate2bme@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Just like they do social security? The government is terrible at the distribution of money.
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Elaborate?
RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
They seem to be pretty good at making sure the military has all the finding they need
vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
The program that lifted millions of seniors out of poverty. That money.