It’s the lighting.
Comment on What a nice blue and black dress.
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 14 hours ago
I always saw blue and black, no idea how anyone could see it as white and gold unless they were colorblind tbh
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 hours ago
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
What’a always bothered me is, the lighting in the original is so ridiculously blown out that it MUST be blue and black! It could only be white and gold under very dark lighting which is clearly not the case. Unless maybe people are thinking the front is in shadow…?
teslekova@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Yep, I thought the front was in shadow, so I always saw gold and white.
tomi000@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Crazy, its almost as if color perception is individual and dependent on lighting and surroundings. Obviously only your perception of reality is the “real” one.
Lojcs@piefed.social 12 hours ago
Blue and gold maybe, but white and gold doesn’t even make sense to me. For a white dress to look blue it needs to be under blue light, which would cause the gold highlights to be dark with a blue sheen. The missing blue sheen indicates that either it’s gold under natural lighting or black under yellowish lighting.
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I am not colourblind afaik and I could not for the llife pf me see it as blue and black. The lighting just made no sense fpr that to be the case.
Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
thats because the OG** photo** (left) it is gold lace on a “white dress” (with a blue tint lighting effect etc) while IRL the dress is black & blue. right side is the edited OP photo. the difference is ‘night and day’ and if these all look the same i’ve got some news for you. … Image
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I know I wa stalking about the OG photo. Though to be honest even the edited one does not look completely blue and black to me. I know the dress is blue and black in reality.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Ok this confirms my suspicion! In order for it to be white and gold you’d need to see the dress as in shadow. I always assumed it was in light because the image was lile blown out max lighting, but if you then assume that since it’s backlit the dress is in shadow and there isn’t significant front lighting, it could actually be white and gold. This theory has been nagging at me for YEARS and you just solved it, thank you!
lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Okay, something weird just happened to me… When I sent my last comment, I couldn’t perceive it as anything but white and gold… Now, out of nowhere, i can’t perceive it as anything but blue and black… Why? How? What just happened?
lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
I don’t think that’s it. I can’t perceive the original image as anything but white and gold. I tried to convince my brain about the lighting situation, but I don’t think it has helped.
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
No problem. I know the true colour but looking at the actual image I cannot force myself to see it as blue and black. It always looks white and gold even though that makes no sense if you analyse the image even slightly. It has to be in the light but my brains just refuses to see it that way.
realitista@lemmus.org 14 hours ago
I’m mildly colorblind and it’s just too dark for me to make out. It could be white, blue, etc. But the black part doesn’t look solid enough to be black either. I just think the camera failed to properly get a read at that lighting level .
ace_garp@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
That is what I am seeing now too, same as the first time I saw this.
However, when it got posted to Lemmy ~7months ago I could switch it between colours.
I posted then, about how to do it. Something like defocussing your eyes, and then looking at the sunny part on the right-side, to switch to white&gold.
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 5 hours ago
In 11 years, I’m still unable to see white and gold
ace_garp@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Turns out his is a fine shitpost.
Posting a saturated picture that is only a black and blue dress, rather than the orig picture.
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 4 hours ago
That’s the one I’m talking about
tae_glas@slrpnk.net 13 hours ago
the original photo was much more faded than the one posted here, so people’s colour perception depended on how yellow/blue they perceived the photo’s light to be tinted, and how bright/dark their screens were.
…wikimedia.org/…/960px-Wikipe-tan_wearing_The_Dre…
ptu@sopuli.xyz 8 minutes ago
That one is easy, on the left is black and blue and on the right white and gold
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 5 hours ago
I’ve seen the original one back when it was first popular, still couldn’t understand the white and gold people
papalonian@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I’ve always been able to see both colors of the dress by changing the size of the image, so the phenomenon “made sense” to me, but I legitimately have no idea how that image is supposed to explain it lol. There’s two different colored dresses with seemingly random parts highlighted with different colored boxes… are they supposed to look the same in the highlighted area or something?
Godnroc@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
The connected boxes show that the same color appears on both sides; however, the colored boxes provide context based on the lighting which is further reenforced by the rest of the dress outside the box.
Technology Connections did a video about brown that has the same color of orange on a background that cycles between white and black and the color of orange seems to shift to brown or orange depending on the background.
Windex007@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Id never seen this image before but it’s the clearest and most intuitive illustration of the effect I’ve seen.