Comment on Civilization 7 developers Firaxis have laid off an unspecified number of workers, 2K confirm
Olap@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Anyone actually playing 7? I know of no one personally, and I’ve played them all religiously
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 month ago
MBech@feddit.dk 1 month ago
That’s about as expected. As a big fan of civ, it just looked like a worse version of 6, which was a worse version of 5.
Only reason for the bigger playercount of 6 i because of Sean Bean’s incredible narration.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I bet proportionally more DRM-free buyers play 5 and 4 too.
SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Just want a version that is strategic-view only
warm@kbin.earth 1 month ago
You can play Unciv on mobile I guess, I don't see why you would want a strategic view only though? Nothing stopping you just using that mode exclusively yourself.
pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Honestly that’s just how Civ has been for the past few releases, most people don’t get it until the typical set of 2 major expansion packs come out and eventually go on sale. The base price of the full package has always been crazy high.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 month ago
We will see. 'Cause for all Civ 6’s (and every Civ’s) controversy, this feels different… It’s like people have forgotten 7.
Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Nah, 4 is still the best.
comador@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Beyond the Sword with Leonard Nemoy narrating of course.
Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
There are also a bunch of mods, including the total conversion ones.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well they removed the ability to play as “A civilization” in the game called “Civilization” so yeah everyone I know has swore off it.
lmagitem@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Yes and no. If you want to play China you can play as the various Chinese incarnations from beginning to end.
warm@kbin.earth 1 month ago
Nah, 5 is still the goat.
Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Yeah, I like it. It's definitely an unfinished product and lacking a lot of content and polish atm, but it's got the bones of a good game. Absolutely not worth the current asking price tho
Bademantel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean why play an unfinished game? The radical changes sound interesting to me but it needs at least two add-ons to flourish, the same old story as with 5 and 6. I can wait and pick up the complete experience for half the price if that ever sees the light of day after the layoffs.
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I played through exactly one full game, and it just felt… pointless, I guess? Like I was just clicking through turns to get to the end and none of it mattered. Then it told me I’d lost and was like “K” and then played Civ VI for a bit.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Naw, 5 and 6 are where it is at.
Nelots@piefed.zip 1 month ago
Nah, 2 was the series peak.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Nah, I didn’t even bother. I only play 5 & 6.
iMastari@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Naw, 1 was the GOAT. The full game, no DLC, one price.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I gave up after the 20th bug I encountered. (Yes I kept track.)
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It shipped with Denuvo and I don’t pay for malware. It’s the first Civ game I haven’t bought at launch. I’m including the original.
Ugurcan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It doesn’t have Hot Seat either. I instantly refunded when I realized that. How the hell a Civ game have multiplayer but not hot seat?
Prathas@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Might it get added later, hopefully?
Ugurcan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I won’t buy promises anymore, sorry.