Walk_blesseD
@Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone
- a very silly girlie in her toxic femininity era (but like, in a I-support-women’s-wrongs kinda way)
- Butlerian jihadist (machines should not think!!;! BAD!!) (techbros plz face the wall 🥺)
- I do a little fedposting, as a treat
- anarchist (I need to believe a better world is possible)
- Comment on Has a woman ever orgasmed by subwoofer? 3 days ago:
No. Subwoofers don't have fingers.
- Comment on Milliamp-hours per hour 1 week ago:
I'm particularly fond of kWh per year tbh: E/t•t/t
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
Because I say so
Mate, you're cooked in the head. Your brain is the completely smooth, frictionless surface used in test questions in high school physics classes.
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
Observable characteristics don't determine sex, but this one chromosome that nobody even knew existed seventy years ago and that doesn't actually do a whole lot does
Bro really ate the L on that one 🤣🤣🤣
Cope, seethe, mald ya drongo
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
Lol back up your refutation with some facts, bozo
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
First, everybody should take note of the fact that you still haven't provided a source showing that trans women have any sort of across-the-board competitive advantage over cis women in sport. I can only presume that's because you don't have any. Pathetic. Moving on.
Claiming that the fact you're arguing from a "basic" understanding is somehow a point in your favour is some pigeon-shitting-on-the-chessboard-and-claiming-victory type shit, and you should feel embarrassed.
Sure, you personally are allowed to use a model of sex as determined by the presence or absence of a Y chromosome, but such a model is overly simplistic, and to act as though that's the only correct model that either society or science broadly operates on is completely disconnected from reality.
This should be painfully obvious to everybody, given that people have been determining sex since long before the discovery of DNA, nevermind sex chromosomes. Likewise, medical staff determine the sex of babies not by running DNA tests, but by visually examining the genitals, ie a primary sex characteristic.But furthermore, a Y-chromosome-as-sole-determinant-of-sex model is flawed for other reasons, too. For one thing, it's not the Y chromosome itself that causes male sex development, it's a specific gene that just usually happens to exist on it: the SRY gene. Someone can have a Y chromosome, but lacking the SRY gene will develop a female phenotype. Conversely, it's also possible for the SRY gene to attach itself to an X chromosome and cause someone lacking a Y chromosome to nevertheless follow a male pattern of sex development.
Now get this through your skull: the SRY gene doesn't actually do a whole lot, either—it mostly just instructs the gonads to develop into testes rather than ovaries, and it's the—you're not gonna believe this—sex hormones which the gonads go on to produce that cause the body to develop pretty much every primary and secondary sex characteristic down the line—barring insensitivities to them, of course, and it is in the actual materially observable sex characteristics, primary and secondary alike, that people are most likely to realise differences in sex, rather than in some chromosome we don't know is there or not until it's specifically tested for….
And gonads can be removed. Primary sex characteristics can be surgically altered. Exogenous sex hormones can become dominant in a person's endocrine system and can cause the development of new secondary sex characteristics.So relying on just the Y chromosome as a measure of sex comes across as really arbitrary and not functionally useful, given that it doesn't really do a whole lot. In fact, the only reason I can come up with as to why one might hyperfocus on the Y chromosome would be to be shitty to trans and intersex peolpe 🤷♀️
Also, given that not all red blood cells contain DNA, you're wrong again—it's also not written into every cell of a person's body 🤓👆
And finally, it's a blatant example of hypocrisy for you to say I'm equating tits and vocal tone to the essence of human sex (which is itself a wild misrepresentation of my argument) when you yourself did the exact same thing earlier with height, wingspan and lung capacity, which are all also secondary sex characteristics 🤣 make it make sense 🤣🤣You're clearly being intellectually dishonest here, because you know you haven't got a leg to stand on. Dickhead.
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
Yeah righto, you haven't got a clue what you're on about but because you're an entitled fuck with an opinion, you're just putting it out there as confidently as you can because you're hoping people will uncritically agree with it since it reaffirms their priors.
But you're wrong. Biological sex is malleable. The whole fucking point of sex hormones is to guide the development of sex characteristics. It's kinda in the name. Or did you think people's bodies somehow magically just do that by themselves during puberty and that sex hormones have nothing to do with it??? Are you stupid????
If what you're saying were true and trans women were, as you say, "biOlogiKalLy maLe," and had all the many advantages over cis women in sports that come with that, surely you'd feel confident in providing research that supports your conclusion specifically as regarding trans women instead of having to equivocate them with a completely different demographic—because tbh doing the latter and calling it a day just screams of intellectual cowardice.
And no, I'm not getting anything mixed up, you smug arsehole. Trans people do (broadly speaking—some don't but those aren't relevant to this discussion) change sex by undergoing various processes that alter their bodies' sex characteristics on a biological level, and you living in denial isn't gonna change that. I'm really curious as to what, specifically, you think determines sex.
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
But they're placed exactly where they should be? If they should be placed higher, that's where they'd be… seems like you're the one getting mad over a skill issue on other people's behalf tbh. It's weird.
You're acting as though Lia Thomas didn't have every right to compete as she did, despite fulfilling all the eligibility criteria that were in place at the time, so your argument at this stage seems equally applicable to all the cis women who outperformed her, too, but you're not whining for the benefit of all the poor womanses that were denied the opportunity to place higher than they did by them, are you?
- Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
Oi mate, you might wanna read the post again. You do understand that it's about trans women competing in women's sports, not about cis men competing in women's sports, right…? Because those aren't the same.
There's far more overlap between the physiolgical characteristics of transsexual females and cissexual females than there is between transsexual females and cissexual males, so by categorically conflating trans females with males you're really just showing off that you know sweet fuck all about this issue. - Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records 1 week ago:
It may not be an issue to you, but it's an issue to every woman whose ranking is lower as a result.
Really? "Every"? You asked every single one of them, did you? Or are you just talking out your arse on the behalf of hundreds of people you don't even know?
- Comment on Anon is feeling romantic 2 weeks ago:
👍
- Comment on Anon is feeling romantic 2 weeks ago:
> try dunking on someone online
> can't even use escape characters
> mfw - Comment on Anon is feeling romantic 2 weeks ago:
And I'm telling you that bro wasn't criticising shit so your point is completely irrelevant to this thread 🤷♀️
And as a punchline, it's way past its expiration date.
The fuck would you know about dates, anyway? Seeing as how you're clearly upset you don't get any 😎👉👉
- Comment on Anon is feeling romantic 2 weeks ago:
Damn, all I'm seeing here is hella moid coping and seething 💅
- Comment on Anon is feeling romantic 2 weeks ago:
Bro you are functionally illiterate. That wasn't a coherent criticism of a specific tendency within online feminism that dickhead made, it was a broad and concavebrained generalisation.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Bro thinks this is 2014 frfr
- Comment on Black Holes 3 weeks ago:
And you will worship him
- Comment on Black Holes 3 weeks ago:
The Beast and his armies shall rise from the pit and make war against God.
- Comment on mogbattle 3 weeks ago:
That baby is aura farming frfr
- Comment on Steam had already shown its true face, GOG and itch.io are fighting censorship alone. 4 weeks ago:
It's almost as though I said it's suspicious specifically because of the context you put yourself in by making that conflation.
- Comment on Steam had already shown its true face, GOG and itch.io are fighting censorship alone. 4 weeks ago:
NSFW,LGBTQIA+,Fauxcest,rapey,violent content
With a username like yours I'd be really fucking careful about conflating those things. Then again, I don't go putting "88" in mine, so what do I know?
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Hell nah lmao I got surgically sterilised at 22 (had most of my reproductive system cut out), and while my attitudes towards children have softened since then it's still the best decision I ever made.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Damn, lotta moid seething itt
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
No, this is Patrick!
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
What's the problem? Scared you'd prove your own claim wrong?
- Comment on Easy mistake to make 4 weeks ago:
Funnily enough, most of the butches I've encountered are bi 🤷♀️
- Comment on Bob Katter refuses to swear oath to King Charles 5 weeks ago:
- Comment on Bob Katter refuses to swear oath to King Charles 5 weeks ago:
Touché
- Comment on Bob Katter refuses to swear oath to King Charles 5 weeks ago:
Racism. The answer is racism.
- Comment on North Korea and South Korea isn't working. Let's try West Korea and East Korea instead. 5 weeks ago:
Again, you mean?
