I mean you’re not going to pay for telly if you can’t afford food or AC.
500,000 households cancel TV licence putting BBC future in jeopardy
Submitted 1 hour ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
Comments
agentTeiko@piefed.social 1 hour ago
bl4ckp1xx13@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
AC is not a thing here. Our houses were built when the climate was correct, and we needed to keep heat in.
That’s why we complain about heatwaves that bring us the same temperatures as the US experiences, we don’t have respite.
agentTeiko@piefed.social 9 minutes ago
I know AC is not a thing hence the need to pay to put it in. I know central Air is out due to no ducts but my uncle had AC installed in his conservatory last year and it was not cheap.
tal@lemmy.today 1 hour ago
I’m pretty sure that a lot more Brits presently have a television than air conditioning.
searches
In 2025, there were 29.0 million households in the UK
en.wikipedia.org/…/Television_licensing_in_the_Un…
In March 2024, there were 23.9 million licences, of which 3,600 (0.015%) were monochrome (black and white).
So about 82% of households have a TV.
theguardian.com/…/air-conditioning-uk-homes-heatw…
An estimated 4m homes have an air conditioner, double the figure from three years ago.
And about 14% have air conditioning.
SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 49 minutes ago
I don’t know anyone with AC. I don’t know anyone without a TV.
Do consider, a TV starts at around a few hundred quid. AC, for a single unit installed, is £3.5k.
kfml9m5s@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
Just put adverts and stop scamming people with hidden “taxes”
Lumidaub@feddit.org 24 minutes ago
You really don’t want them to become dependant on advertisers.
TIEPilot@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
like@feddit.uk 1 hour ago
I still think the BBC is worth preserving but I’ve no idea how it should be done
Direct gov funding seems out of the question as independence is required for reputational reasons at least
Extending license regs so you need one to watch youtube/netflix/etc an obvious non-starter (hopefully)
Expanding commercial operations so they can sell access to archives through iplayer, overseas subscriptions, Huw Edwards merch etc might be ok but unlikely to raise the billions required to operate
At this point is it saveable?
cristian64@reddthat.com 25 minutes ago
I wouldn’t say “gov funding”, as the money comes from tax payers. It has to be publicly funded. As long as the entity is managed democratically, I think it’s worth preserving.
anothermember@feddit.uk 48 minutes ago
The problem is that TV is a slowly dying format, so any attempt at saving the BBC is an uphill struggle even with the best will for it. Which I think is a shame, I think it’s culturally important. It needed to have evolved quicker and sooner, but how exactly I don’t know.
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 34 minutes ago
They have a streaming service. They can charge for it.
Doesn’t seem that complicated.
AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 40 minutes ago
I wonder if it would be possible to do direct government funding but via legislation that states that it needs a supermajority or something to be repealed