I went into IT with an open mind and was prepared for that scene. Kept thinking that it probably made a lot of sense since many King fans had said it had a very beautiful reason behind it.
Then I get to it. And it’s just stupid. Genuinely stupid.
The kids are scared of forgetting each other, because that is the power of IT. It makes people forget as they grow up.
So they want to do something meaningful to remember each other. And Bev is like: y’all can fuck me.
And I am over here like: how are the boys supposed to remember each other if they only fuck you? If that scene was supposed to make a lick of sense, the kids would have an orgy with each other and not just the boys lining up to have sex with one girl.
I can go along with weird and uncomfortable ideas in books if they make sense. In this case, it made no sense. But people either seem to defend it because they just go along with the premise or they defend King because he was high or some shit.
I’m not defending bad storytelling. IT has a lot of cool concepts in it and no one can write about small communities like King can, but I’m not gonna pretend like the kids having sex is some clever narrative device. It’s very, very stupid.
I also think the Turtle is goofy af.
goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Hey now, let’s be clear. Stephen King did not have the clown defeated by a bunch of outcast youths gangbanging in a sewer. That’s just patently incorrect. Every single part. No, he had the ancient terror disguised as a clown temporarily banished by summoning an ancient turtle from the dawn of time and engaging It in a battle of wills. Anyone that’s actually read the book knows the outcast youth sewer gangbang happens after that and actually has no bearing on the plot whatsoever. Stephen King’s not some freak writing a book where the entire plot hinges on a bunch of traumatized kids screwing each other to save the world, no; he’s a perfectly normal guy writing about a bunch of traumatized kids screwing each other for no reason at all. Bet you feel real silly now, huh?
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
What the fuck are you on about? Nothing you said is remotely true, this is a gross misinterpretation of the events depicted in the book.
It’s not a gangbang, it’s a train. They go one after the other.
massive_bereavement@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
I thought that in order to be a train they should be connected to each other.
gurty@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
And this was the stuff he got published. I’d dread to read his drafts and unreleased material from that era.
abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Was there not some time traveling component? Like their future selves had to find each other again and come back ti their childhoods. I thought that was what made the “children having sex” part not as triggering as it sounds,because they were actually adults. Mind you, it’s been years since I read the book. I might be misremembering things.
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
So … adult-minds having sex with children’s bodies?
That makes it worse!
paranoia@feddit.dk 2 weeks ago
No, it is even more bizarre. They have sex because the group is lost in the sewer and apparently this makes them know where they are, somehow, so they can leave, which they then do. It adds literally nothing to the plot, apart from really shoddy symbolism of growing up.
NoosFraba@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Sounds like sense8 but your kid self hitches a ride or something. What the what Stephen
pohart@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Well if that’s in there, 12 year old me definitely missed it.
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
I remember it being for the need to destroy their innocence.
Since that attracts these clowns.
JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network 3 weeks ago
It was actually closer to needing to restore the power of friendship
unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Is this a copypasta
goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
not yet