kibblebits

@kibblebits@quokk.au

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon reads horror⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  I guess. I mean, he’s a pervert who wants to watch kids fuck. You know he jerked off after writing it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon reads horror⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t know. His books aren’t that great. His movie adaptations are just okay.

  He has some early work that was good and got a lot of attention. It was back in the prime days of horror novels. Right place right time. That’s all.

  With the right amount of cocaine I think you or I could probably give him a run for his money

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon reads horror⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  You get the logic… of… peeing or the middle school gang bang to defeat a monster?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon reads horror⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m certain someone did. At least he came on himself and not in a middle school child.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon reads horror⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  I think a lot of people never saw it coming. He was on a lot of drugs at the time.

  That said, in every single book he wrote, he has very elaborate scenes where a person urinates themselves. Every. Single. Book.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon reads horror⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  The book has child porn in it. A group fuck where they all fuck the girl.

  Not joking.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Illuminati are ending the world May 17 2027⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Stop, I can only get so erect.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨An 82-year-old YouTuber grandma was raided by police and SWATs during her live stream last night where she plays Minecraft to raise money for her grandsons cancer. Authorities brought 20 police cars⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  All cops are idiots.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨When a judge tells the jury to ‘forget XYZ,’ how can the jury possibly do that?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  If they don’t, and they say they aren’t, it is a mistrial.

  If they don’t, and they keep their mouth shut, then no one knows.

  Connected.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨When a judge tells the jury to ‘forget XYZ,’ how can the jury possibly do that?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  They have to. I mean legally they cannot consider that evidence. If they keep bringing it up in jury deliberations, and that gets reported, it would be a mistrial.

  However, you’re right in that it cannot be erased from a person’s mind… the phrase I’ve heard used is “ringing the bell” which is when a lawyer might mention a persons prior convictions, but that gets objected to and stricken. But the bell rung and the jury knows.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨When a judge tells the jury to ‘forget XYZ,’ how can the jury possibly do that?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  They don’t. But later in deliberations they cannot see it in a transcript. They are supposed to base everything on the evidence they have.

  So, if something is said that absolutely incriminates a person, but it’s thrown out on a technicality and little evidence remains… technically they should be not guilty.

  Conversely, if someone is being railroaded for a crime and the only evidence placing them half way across the world at the time is somehow thrown out…. They’d have to find them guilty.

  Could you? I could not.