They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about
Omg
Submitted 2 days ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/5ec766c8-cce9-4386-bf13-b3ccac9061c8.jpeg
Comments
amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 days ago
amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So true!
danekrae@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Indestructible, my ass.
Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 days ago
Wtf is wrong with people
brian@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
but they weren’t destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they’d have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.
pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Ah, the “stick vs.1000 us marines” conundrum
blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 days ago
It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.
darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Bonus fun fact: Stonehenge is not a true henge!
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Stonehenge did nothing wrong. Henge is the imposter here. Henge came by and just decided to define itself differently to discredit Stonehenge. Henge will never succeed in its sick plot.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 days ago
if we’re defining it by the ditch, then what is it?
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Oh my God, now we’re gatekeeping henges…
frog@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Based on the title for The Hill, is it even stone?
Saapas@piefed.zip 2 days ago
Oh damn you had already mentioned this!
Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.
Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 day ago
nearly indestructible
Yeah. Nearly. That’s why some got replaced with concrete to keep up appearances.
Enzy@feddit.nu 1 day ago
Ah yes Rockhenge
markz@suppo.fi 2 days ago
aLiEnS
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Basalt is pretty tough I hear
Mpatch@lemmy.world 1 day ago
As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is
Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Barium salt? It’s got electrolytes.
Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Why is a political website posting about Stonehenge…
fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Heritage is a political resource.
plinky@hexbear.net 2 days ago
alien druid-engineers, foreseeing british hooliganism: yeah, can’t use sandstone here, folks. 👷♀️
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 days ago
…uh, your link is just to a stupid image.
Ravi@feddit.org 2 days ago
No it’s cake!
Danarchy@lemmy.nz 2 days ago
Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it
leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 2 days ago
50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.
lividweasel@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then
pennomi@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That’s exactly how I’ve always pronounced it, too.
Saapas@piefed.zip 2 days ago
Something I learned from QI
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge
Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 days ago
The article you keep linking disagrees.
An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.