They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about
Omg
Submitted 1 month ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/5ec766c8-cce9-4386-bf13-b3ccac9061c8.jpeg
Comments
amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So true!
danekrae@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Indestructible, my ass.
Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
Wtf is wrong with people
brian@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
but they weren’t destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they’d have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.
pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Ah, the “stick vs.1000 us marines” conundrum
blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 month ago
It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.
darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Bonus fun fact: Stonehenge is not a true henge!
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Stonehenge did nothing wrong. Henge is the imposter here. Henge came by and just decided to define itself differently to discredit Stonehenge. Henge will never succeed in its sick plot.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 month ago
if we’re defining it by the ditch, then what is it?
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Oh my God, now we’re gatekeeping henges…
frog@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Based on the title for The Hill, is it even stone?
Saapas@piefed.zip 1 month ago
Oh damn you had already mentioned this!
Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.
Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 month ago
nearly indestructible
Yeah. Nearly. That’s why some got replaced with concrete to keep up appearances.
markz@suppo.fi 1 month ago
aLiEnS
Enzy@feddit.nu 1 month ago
Ah yes Rockhenge
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Basalt is pretty tough I hear
Mpatch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is
Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Barium salt? It’s got electrolytes.
plinky@hexbear.net 1 month ago
alien druid-engineers, foreseeing british hooliganism: yeah, can’t use sandstone here, folks. 👷♀️
Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 month ago
Why is a political website posting about Stonehenge…
fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Heritage is a political resource.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 month ago
…uh, your link is just to a stupid image.
Ravi@feddit.org 1 month ago
No it’s cake!
Danarchy@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it
BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
So much less destructible than Strawhenge or Woodhenge.
leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 1 month ago
50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.
lividweasel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then
pennomi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s exactly how I’ve always pronounced it, too.
Saapas@piefed.zip 1 month ago
Something I learned from QI
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge
Wolf314159@startrek.website 1 month ago
The article you keep linking disagrees.
An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.