They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about
Omg
Submitted 2 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/5ec766c8-cce9-4386-bf13-b3ccac9061c8.jpeg
Comments
amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 months ago
amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 2 months ago
So true!
danekrae@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Indestructible, my ass.
Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 months ago
Wtf is wrong with people
brian@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
but they weren’t destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they’d have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.
pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
Ah, the “stick vs.1000 us marines” conundrum
blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 months ago
It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.
darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Bonus fun fact: Stonehenge is not a true henge!
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
Stonehenge did nothing wrong. Henge is the imposter here. Henge came by and just decided to define itself differently to discredit Stonehenge. Henge will never succeed in its sick plot.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 months ago
if we’re defining it by the ditch, then what is it?
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Oh my God, now we’re gatekeeping henges…
frog@feddit.uk 2 months ago
Based on the title for The Hill, is it even stone?
Saapas@piefed.zip 2 months ago
Oh damn you had already mentioned this!
Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.
Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 month ago
nearly indestructible
Yeah. Nearly. That’s why some got replaced with concrete to keep up appearances.
markz@suppo.fi 2 months ago
aLiEnS
Enzy@feddit.nu 1 month ago
Ah yes Rockhenge
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Basalt is pretty tough I hear
Mpatch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is
Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Barium salt? It’s got electrolytes.
plinky@hexbear.net 2 months ago
alien druid-engineers, foreseeing british hooliganism: yeah, can’t use sandstone here, folks. 👷♀️
Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 month ago
Why is a political website posting about Stonehenge…
fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Heritage is a political resource.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 months ago
…uh, your link is just to a stupid image.
Ravi@feddit.org 2 months ago
No it’s cake!
Danarchy@lemmy.nz 2 months ago
Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it
BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
So much less destructible than Strawhenge or Woodhenge.
leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 2 months ago
50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.
lividweasel@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then
pennomi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s exactly how I’ve always pronounced it, too.
Saapas@piefed.zip 2 months ago
Something I learned from QI
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge
Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 months ago
The article you keep linking disagrees.
An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.