Android phones for example
What prevents Linux from being installed on mobile devices?
Submitted 2 months ago by shadysus@lemmy.ca to [deleted]
Comments
sirico@feddit.uk 2 months ago
cabbage@piefed.social 2 months ago
More than anything, the problem is apps. I installed Ubuntu Touch on an old device I had lying around (after replacing the battery to bring it back to life), and I ended up liking it more than my daily driver. It worked, the interface was snappy (no pun intended), and there's a lot of solid design choices. I found myself trying to navigate with gestures on my android phone after.
However, I could not talk to my friends, who unfortunately use WhatsApp. I could not install my banking app. There's a bunch of small thorns in the side that makes changing difficult for most users - kind of like in the early days of desktop Linux.
As in the early days of desktop Linux, the solution might lie in a compatibility layer (like WINE). Android emulation within at least Ubuntu Touch has gotten quite good, I believe. Unfortunately my device is too old to support it.
Those interested should also check out Postmarket OS.
GNOME, a major desktop environment, is also moving towards all apps being designed for all types of devices. But as long as people can't use their banks, switching is hard.
Kelly@lemmy.world 2 months ago
More than anything, the problem is apps.
True, its a real chicken and egg situation. No one what to use a platform without decent app support but no one wants to develop for a platform without any users.
Gingernate@programming.dev 2 months ago
Do you have a link for what gnome is doing?
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 months ago
There was also the Nokia N900 which ran Maemo, which was much closer to a traditional Linux distribution to the point that it was fairly trivial to compile desktop Linux programs for it. Which could even be done on the phone itself, if you had a lot of time on your hands.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I’ve seen marathons with less running-on than that sentence-esque collection of letters.
ch00f@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Android OS runs a modified version of the Linux kernel.
superkret@feddit.org 2 months ago
And with Termux, you can run Linux on Android on Linux.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Shhhh…
we don’t speak of that.
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 months ago
The processors and peripherals aren't as uniform as they are on computers. Each SoC has a different set of components, which need drivers and custom set-up mechanics and they're often only shared between the chip designer and phone manufacturers. A lot of complicated reverse engineering is needed. And that's often not worth it as there are many different phones on the market and they're short-lived devices. So we end up in the current situation where we don't have the operating system foundation available to the community to build upon.
There is Linux on phones. A modified Linux kernel runs on every Android device. Just the userland is an entirely different one. And Linux isn't there yet with the desktop and apps. A lot of features are missing, power saving, delivering messages while sleeping and doing background tasks while saving power in the pocket... It's kind of a chicken and egg problem.
Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Nothing prevents you drom installing a linux os on an android phone, privided someone madw a rom for your device. It’s just not very useable due to proprietary drivers. Ubuntu touch exists for example, but on most phones you can’t even use the cellular antenna iirc
PonyOfWar@pawb.social 2 months ago
Nothing really. Someone else already wrote that Android is technically Linux. But you can also get “regular” Linux on mobile devices, it’s just a matter of using a distribution with mobile-friendly UI as well as getting driver support for the phone’s hardware. Ubuntu touch exists for example, but only works on a limited number of devices and even on supported devices it’s not really good enough for the average user yet.
axzxc1236@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Pratically no universal way of making Linux boot with ARM processors.
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 months ago
This is the key - no universal (i.e. No open standard) BIOS like on PCs.
We need a BIOS war for ARM, and since Android has it locked down, there’s no competition to push for it, unlike when DOS was trying to become the standard.
XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
In practice? Constantly changing hardware with soc vendors that publish nothing and device manufacturers that (have to) keep pushing out new models on a short cycle. Plus many of them have extra shenanigans to keep the bootloader locked so you can’t install a recovery (presuming you had a working one) so you could replace the os. There are some rare exceptions, but the hardware is rare and tedious and not many people can or will work on installable Linux on them.
If you just want to run some Linux userland, there’s ways to do that on top of android, though. Want to get to a Linux like system or run a program? Might be as close as installing a terminal or running adb shell.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Locked bootloaders can prevent that. Or proprietary hardware drivers can make it unworkable.
therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Android is Linux
bamfic@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Because all the linux distros for mobile are steaming piles of horse shit.
pelya@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You can install Linux on rooted phones using Linux Deploy, or you can install Linux-in-an-app such as Userland or Termux if you don’t have root.
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I guess I’m going to be that guy today. Android is Linux, and it’s installed on a lot of mobile devices already.
mkwt@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Another aspect to this is that Android is Linux, but it is not GNU / Linux. This is true both in the literal sense of not using GNU coreutils or glibc, and also in the broader sense.
What I mean by the “broader” sense:
To the application programmer Android Linux looks like a completely different ball game.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
You’ll see that’s not the question that was asked. And it’s okay not to give Stallman any more validation for his fame-grab.
JetpackJackson@feddit.org 2 months ago
And you can (sometimes) install something like PostmarketOS which is closer to the kind of linux people think about when they hear “Linux”
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
PostmarketOS isn’t “closer”… It fully is GNU/Linux.
sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Android is maintaining a fork of Linux kernel that has since diverged.
Its like saying MAC is UNIX, technically yes but not really
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 months ago
macOS is UNIX-based. Period. In fact, “[s]tarting with Leopard, macOS has been certified as compatible with the Single UNIX Specification version 3 (SUSv3).” Source
ricdeh@lemmy.world 2 months ago
macOS is definitely Unix. In the literal sense that it is actually certified (unlike FreeBSD, for example), and it is very much Unix-y under the hood.
stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 months ago
As far as I can tell literally everything (except for windows) is UNIX, it isn’t exactly a high bar to pass, it’s like saying all drinks are water based which is technically true but I’m not going to give a kid a wine box when I run out of juice boxes.
zante@lemmy.wtf 2 months ago
Linux is synonymous with open source and freedom and to some extent privacy.
android is synonymous with Google
I’m only guessing, but when people ask about a Linux tablet or phone, they actually want the former, rather than the later, even though android is a Linux derivative, as you rightly said.
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 months ago
FYI, Android is open source.