I’m saving this and I’m going to use it so much
research
Submitted 6 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/c01c5036-4868-41cd-a1b0-85f3f5e26c0e.jpeg
Comments
Im_old@lemmy.world 6 months ago
lars@lemmy.sdf.org 6 months ago
Save yourself if you wish. They’ll say “well that just means that the peer-reviewed articles are in on it, too”. 🤦♂️
Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Dude. I completely forgot that Cillian Murphy was in Inception with DiCaprio!
Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
This post came back for you…to remind you of something you once knew…
fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
This could backfire so horribly when they take that as permission to let all their crazy out.
Sorgan71@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I’ve never seen a published paper on how to make meth. I gotta get that info from Bill, and his parents were siblings.
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
You must not have looked very thoroughly.
Here’s one which compares multiple synthetic routes and their impurity profiles: doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.fsisyn.2020.06.004
spiderwort@lemm.ee 6 months ago
To underline the point : research does not imply publishing. Did I get that right?
KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Youtube
Steve@startrek.website 6 months ago
Tiktok if you’re lucky
Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 months ago
Facebook most likely
Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The guy who set himself on fire actually had lots of proof.
Unfortunately the proof is just deranged connections
qaz@lemmy.world 6 months ago
My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan.
Well he certainly knows how to write a hook
Jasonw911@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Wow. That was a fascinating look into a paranoid mind.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 months ago
TRUTH SOCIAL ITS GOT TRUTH INNTHE NAME THATS HOW YOU KNOW ITS TRUE AND ITS BACKED BY THE MESSIAH TURNIP GODBBLESS STAY SAFE VOTE FOR PEDRO
sazey@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Like most published research isn’t unreproducible horseshit mostly there because of name dropping or dollars.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 months ago
Fwiw the reproducibility crisis isn’t because of “horseshit” science. There are a few examples of that for sure. But the vast majority of it is just good science that happens to be wrong. The scientific method doesn’t mean the wrong conclusion can be drawn, especially when for budgetary reasons sample sizes are relatively limited, or when the effect size being studied is small, or there are too many confounding variables.
That’s not a mark against the studies though. It’s just a mark in favour of attempting to reproduce studies and giving good funding to attempts to do so. And perhaps a mark against using one-off studies with small effect sizes to shape public policy or health advice.
sazey@lemmy.world 6 months ago
My critique was not aimed at the scientific method itself nor at constraints faced by researchers. I was aiming more towards the sneering attitude that published research is the only valid method of drawing a conclusion, especially at the person level.
troglodytis@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Correct, most published research is not unreproducible horseshit.
sazey@lemmy.world 6 months ago
So it is reproducible horseshit, got it.
Beebabe@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Im ashamed to say I get a visceral reaction from people misusing this word
spiderwort@lemm.ee 6 months ago
I researched the spelling of “research” for this reply.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 months ago
Slap a doi on it.
John_McMurray@lemmy.world 6 months ago
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research you should have done yours
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Tumblr
niktemadur@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Á la recherche du science perdú! Aka “The Sound Of Silence”.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 months ago
Wait, an accent on the U? I thought the participle of perdre was just perdu. Typo? Or does that accent actually have done significance here?
jxk@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
The correct phrase is « à la recherche de la science perdue »
niktemadur@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Oops, typo. My first language is Spanish, I assumed there was an accent at the end.
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I do love that flat earth documentary where the guy eventually proved the Earth is a sphere.
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
It goes further than that.
Sargent says something along the lines of, “We can’t tell people about this result. They’ll kill us.”
The entire film sets up the premise that NASA is hiding research about a flat earth. They are guarding the ice wall so people don’t see it.
Then they hide research showing the earth is round.
These people don’t care about science. They care about power.
It’s no accident that conspiracy theorists and conservatives have a considerable overlap.
meliaesc@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I’m incredibly high and cannot handle this 😂
spiderwort@lemm.ee 6 months ago
My cynicism is so automatic that I could never say what you just said and keep a straight face.