I wish I could have half the confidence these people have talking about the things I actually know.
the internet
Submitted 8 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/0d545dca-6dd9-4a65-8874-5458760fed1e.jpeg
Comments
Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 8 months ago
Wrong: Why Experts Keep Failing Us and How to Know When Not to Trust Them by David H. Freedman
A book recommended by my second year psyc prof.
Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 8 months ago
How do we know that we can trust this author though? 🤔
GluWu@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Are they experts? I probably shouldn’t trust them.
OpenStars@startrek.website 8 months ago
Confidence and Knowledge are anti-correlated… so please, be proud of the extent of your ignorance:-).
force@lemmy.world 8 months ago
this isn’t necessarily true. people who have more knowledge or reasoning generally have higher confidence in their abilities than those with less, although people with less knowledge tend to have a higher disparity between their confidence and their actual performance. people with more knowledge still think they know more than the people with less knowledge, even though despite the higher confidence they still underestimated themselves.
BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 8 months ago
Same with covid.
moistclump@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It’s hard because… you don’t want to dismiss legitimate concerns from uneducated populations. But then there’s a flip side to that where… do you have to hear them out if they’re too far wrong. Maybe it’s less about education and more about someone’s self awareness of the limitations of their own knowledge and willingness to defer to experts. I don’t think you have to be educated to be self aware and curious, and also express things and be heard.
Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
Maybe it’s less about education and more about someone’s self awareness of the limitations of their own knowledge and willingness to defer to experts.
LonelyWendigo@lemmy.world 8 months ago
someone’s self awareness of the limitations of their own knowledge and willingness to defer to experts.
This is a cornerstone of ethics in engineering and many other discipline that I feel is being shouted down daily by a crowd that clearly never took a philosophy or ethics class. Even among engineers it seems to be an increasingly unpopular attitude. It seems to have become popular to praise the braggart and shun the ethical self aware.
bisby@lemmy.world 8 months ago
In my ethics in engineering class, we spent a lot of time talking about things like the Kansas City Hyatt Regency walkway collapsing. The takeaway for me was “Depending on what you are doing, people might die if you are too confidently doing things the wrong way.”
Most people, even a lot of engineers, don’t have lives on the line in their day to day. Things means that most people don’t have the “What if I am wrong about this and people die?” part of their brain firing 24/7. For most people, the “consequences of getting things wrong” means either a lecture from their boss, or literally nothing. When people never have to face consequences for being wrong, they feel very empowered to be wrong.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 months ago
Excuse me, but I’ve beaten all 3 Polybridge games. I think I know a thing or two about bridges. 😤
ivanafterall@kbin.social 8 months ago
Design the bridge as a collapsible ramp for cars to jump across and this never would have happened.
Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 8 months ago
Simply dangle several vertical road segments by a rope. It’s the strongest, most efficient design
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 months ago
Such a good game.
RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
Has “Dear Ashley” not been online during the start and height of the Covid-19 pandemic? It’s not an entirely new concept.
On the other hand, just because you got a title to your name doesn’t make you intelligent or apt to discuss a topic. I have seen many PhD students in my time as one, who shouldn’t have received a PhD in the end as they really weren’t very good at what they were doing. E.g. manual counting of things in images and using the only statistical test that gives you significance, those sort of things in Life Sciences…
BilboBargains@lemmy.world 8 months ago
💯% the title ought to be immaterial or at most a loose guide to credibility. We examine the measurements and observations and propose a hypothesis that doesn’t need to violate the laws of physics to explain what we saw. Anybody can do that but scientists and engineers are the obvious choice. Everyone else go look up the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 8 months ago
People are commenting on a comment about people arguing with insane people about a tradgedy
Moops@lemmy.world 8 months ago
And ya needed to engage because…?
Lighten up and live a little fam. We all just here having a little fun :) Join us in the merrymaking.
jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 8 months ago
Blood for the blood god! :D
Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I downvoted the post thought I should explain why. I’m trying but the internet mostly just seems depressing.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 months ago
the b8 worked, ha
Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Yes it did you caught a manatee in your haddock net :)
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Bridge engineer is a very specific kind of engineer and nobody who is licensed to be a bridge engineer is going to risk their license tothrow in their .02
aaaa@lemmy.world 8 months ago
What exactly are they arguing over? I probably shouldn’t ask, but I’ve been fortunate enough to not encounter any of this controversy on my social media
chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Probably whether or not the ship was loaded with jet fuel or something…
TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 8 months ago
My favorite thing about the jet fuel argument is that it’s actually true. It’s irrelevant, but it’s true.
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
Personally I’ve seen:
actually a terrorist attack that’s being covered up, which includes lots of the bridge and ship version of “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams”
rebuilding it will actually not be expensive because (some insane shit nobody has ever done before). Elon Musk got in on this one!
Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Let me guess, they’re going to make a tunnel instead. But instead of underground they’re going to but it above ground, suspended over the water supported by pillars.
cobysev@lemmy.world 8 months ago
A cargo ship lost power and couldn’t steer, ended up crashing into a bridge and took it down. Drivers were stopped from crossing in time, but there was a construction crew on the bridge who fell with it. Several reported dead.
Now Facebook warriors are arguing that it’s some sort of conspiracy.
Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I still don’t get the point of the OP.
Aren’t Conspiracy Theorists experts in theories of conspiracy?!
/s
WarmSoda@lemm.ee 8 months ago
My buddy brought the bridge up last week and just said yeah the shop crashed into it so what, what conspiracy theory is there?
And says oh no conspiracy theory… and then somehow started talking about racism.
So, I’m still clueless on the whole thing.
spookex@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Idk, wasn’t it reported that it was Indians piloting the ship? Probably something to do with that
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I think people are saying that the bridge shouldn’t have collapsed like that just from being hit by a barge and that there was some kind of structural defect in the bridge. The fact that investigators went straight to’ “maintenance was just fine to the ship” is sus.