I never understood that either. It seems like the steam production is an extra step.
Comment on Reactor goes brrr
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
I’ve always found it slightly funny that nuclear power is technically just a fancy steam engine.
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 month ago
Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So my general understanding is that you can use a magnet to create an electrical current. Its like it pushes the electrons, like a paddle pushing water. So they coil a bunch of wire around a magnet and rotate the magnet, which moves the electrons in the wire and that gets you electrical power. But you need something to push that magnet around, so you attach that to a big ass fan and use steam to push the fan. That’s your turbine. Nuclear power is just using a hot rock to make the steam. Hydroelectric power uses a river to push the turbine. Wind power is doing the same thing, just uhhh, with wind.
Vespair@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Jesus christ this comment deserves a noble prize. Incredibly succinct explanation of something I didn’t get before.
Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Honestly, fantastic explanation!
someguy3@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s pretty much the only pathway to make heat spin a turbine.
booly@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Well, efficiently, at least.
You can always heat up a hot air balloon and have it yank a system of pulleys, but you’re gonna lose a lot of energy that way.
gens@programming.dev 1 month ago
Turning heat into mechanical or chemical or electric energy directly is really hard, you know.
It’s funny that you can get more energy from gas by using it to heat water and using a steam turbine to drive whatever. It’s just not always practical.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I’m not really sure how else you’d do it. The energy we can get out of fission is in the form of heat, and steam isn’t as compressible as just gas and it’s easy to make with just heat. Combine that with electromagnetism giving you electricity by spinning some magnets around some coils, and there you go.
It’s probably possible to get some air hot enough and do some fancy convection work to get it to spin a rotor, but that’s going to be really inefficient.
You could also use the heat to make materials glow and put a solar panel nearby, but that’s also going to be pretty inefficient.
ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Get beta radiation and then put the electrons directly into the wires.
Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s just taking advantage of the change in matter state. H2O expands ~16,000 times it’s size when it boils from liquid water to gaseous steam. That increase in size means it wants to go somewhere else, we just control where it goes and it’s relief valve happens to be going through a spinning wheel with magnets on it, inducing currents in the coils of wire around the wheel.
Yes it’s way more complicated than that, but it’s the best way we have of turning heat into electricity, so it’s what we use. With the primary exception of solar, nearly every form of power production is using heat energy to indirectly spin a wheel.
Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I swear Nuclear Reactors were designed by a chemist with a grudge against a physicist and engineer.
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Almost all power source that generate electricity are fancy steam engines.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Wait, it’s all steam engines?
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
👩🚀🔫👩🚀🔫 always has been
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 month ago
Never got this meme honestly, I should figure it out sometime 🔫🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Hydro, wind, solar, and wave/tide energy capture are not.
The crazy part is photovoltaics are the only power source that doesn’t spin something to make electricity. Truly an outlier.
vaionko@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Except the ones that are. (Concentrated solar power)
boonhet@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Internal combustion engine based generators aren’t fancy steam engines either - however, they have a lot in common still. It’s still just a way to move around a shaft.
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Not entirely true, there is the thermoelectric generator too. Though it’s not too practical
gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
There’s one more outlier though which is Electrochemical cell, like galvanic element or voltaic pile
It was used around 1800 as a major electricity source, but I guess it quickly became uneconomical in 1866 or sth when the dynamo was invented.
Disclaimer: I haven’t studied the history of electricity generation, I just happened to read the history of electricity article on Wikipedia once.
Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Which requires them to output DC rather than AC, so they require inverters to change it to AC. It’s handier for battery storage though.
A7thStone@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Hydro is the most fancy steam engine since it waits for the water to recondense to make power.
someguy3@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Condensed steam.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Has anyone tried using cold steam yet?
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Wait so does that make wind power more or less fancy than hydro?
evidences@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Air is a fluid, it’s hydrodynamics all the way down.