I never understood that either. It seems like the steam production is an extra step.
Comment on Reactor goes brrr
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
I’ve always found it slightly funny that nuclear power is technically just a fancy steam engine.
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 weeks ago
Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So my general understanding is that you can use a magnet to create an electrical current. Its like it pushes the electrons, like a paddle pushing water. So they coil a bunch of wire around a magnet and rotate the magnet, which moves the electrons in the wire and that gets you electrical power. But you need something to push that magnet around, so you attach that to a big ass fan and use steam to push the fan. That’s your turbine. Nuclear power is just using a hot rock to make the steam. Hydroelectric power uses a river to push the turbine. Wind power is doing the same thing, just uhhh, with wind.
Vespair@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
Jesus christ this comment deserves a noble prize. Incredibly succinct explanation of something I didn’t get before.
Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Honestly, fantastic explanation!
someguy3@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s pretty much the only pathway to make heat spin a turbine.
booly@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Well, efficiently, at least.
You can always heat up a hot air balloon and have it yank a system of pulleys, but you’re gonna lose a lot of energy that way.
gens@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Turning heat into mechanical or chemical or electric energy directly is really hard, you know.
It’s funny that you can get more energy from gas by using it to heat water and using a steam turbine to drive whatever. It’s just not always practical.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I’m not really sure how else you’d do it. The energy we can get out of fission is in the form of heat, and steam isn’t as compressible as just gas and it’s easy to make with just heat. Combine that with electromagnetism giving you electricity by spinning some magnets around some coils, and there you go.
It’s probably possible to get some air hot enough and do some fancy convection work to get it to spin a rotor, but that’s going to be really inefficient.
You could also use the heat to make materials glow and put a solar panel nearby, but that’s also going to be pretty inefficient.
ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Get beta radiation and then put the electrons directly into the wires.
Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s just taking advantage of the change in matter state. H2O expands ~16,000 times it’s size when it boils from liquid water to gaseous steam. That increase in size means it wants to go somewhere else, we just control where it goes and it’s relief valve happens to be going through a spinning wheel with magnets on it, inducing currents in the coils of wire around the wheel.
Yes it’s way more complicated than that, but it’s the best way we have of turning heat into electricity, so it’s what we use. With the primary exception of solar, nearly every form of power production is using heat energy to indirectly spin a wheel.
Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I swear Nuclear Reactors were designed by a chemist with a grudge against a physicist and engineer.
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Almost all power source that generate electricity are fancy steam engines.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Wait, it’s all steam engines?
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
👩🚀🔫👩🚀🔫 always has been
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 weeks ago
Never got this meme honestly, I should figure it out sometime 🔫🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Hydro, wind, solar, and wave/tide energy capture are not.
The crazy part is photovoltaics are the only power source that doesn’t spin something to make electricity. Truly an outlier.
vaionko@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Except the ones that are. (Concentrated solar power)
boonhet@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
Internal combustion engine based generators aren’t fancy steam engines either - however, they have a lot in common still. It’s still just a way to move around a shaft.
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Not entirely true, there is the thermoelectric generator too. Though it’s not too practical
gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
There’s one more outlier though which is Electrochemical cell, like galvanic element or voltaic pile
It was used around 1800 as a major electricity source, but I guess it quickly became uneconomical in 1866 or sth when the dynamo was invented.
Disclaimer: I haven’t studied the history of electricity generation, I just happened to read the history of electricity article on Wikipedia once.
Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Which requires them to output DC rather than AC, so they require inverters to change it to AC. It’s handier for battery storage though.
A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Hydro is the most fancy steam engine since it waits for the water to recondense to make power.
someguy3@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Condensed steam.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
Has anyone tried using cold steam yet?
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Wait so does that make wind power more or less fancy than hydro?
evidences@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Air is a fluid, it’s hydrodynamics all the way down.