What it is actually saying is if you don’t know how to gain access to edit this file you should not be editing this file.
When your computer says "You don't have permission to edit this file":
Submitted 15 hours ago by beep@piefed.world to [deleted]
https://media.tenor.com/88Hw8hdI9-sAAAAC/hades-hercules.gif
Comments
Miller@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
bequirtle@lemmy.world 51 minutes ago
I remember trying to mod a game from the xbox app, and couldn’t edit even with trustedinstaller/takeown shenanigans. Turns out the files are encrypted so you can’t even edit it from Linux. And if you disable encryption the game doesn’t run :D
f314@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
When I was a kid I deleted the
system32.dllfile on my grandfather’s computer because it showed up in some error message. It did in fact not solve the error 😅Miller@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Strictly you stopped getting that particular error message.
mtpender@piefed.social 15 hours ago
Linux users: “I don’t have such weaknesses.”
hansolo@lemmy.today 4 hours ago
“You fool, I could sudo rm the whole drive right now. It’s only out of my exuberant benevolence that I don’t.”
Later: me pressing the up key 38 times rather than type sudo apt update && upgrade
Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
I wish. I spent 4 hours trying to get both I and docker to have permission to see my other drive. I finally gave up entirely and made a puid:guid that had access to everything short of root and put myself on that. It’s still dubious as to whether that will work…
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 hours ago
Did you try :Z? Maybe SELinux was blocking you?
pticrix@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
Just do it like a champ and run
sudo chmod -R +777 /! Who needs privilege access anyway?captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Yeah I need to go in and get access to stuff I saved on my older distros/oses somehow
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
Immutable Distros joined the chat
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 hours ago
Well, you can technically remove the immutable flag from files… but I wouldn’t
Lumisal@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Polkit asking you to type the password every few minutes when moving a bunch of files:
mp3@lemmy.ca 15 hours ago
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
Today I tried to wrestle my way with trusted installer… Went so far as to use psexec to make myself nt-authority\system and was still denied permission. ಥ_ಥ
Toes@ani.social 5 hours ago
I’ve done that, did nt authority not work for you? It did for me on server 2008.
You might need to kill any processes with handles to it using process hacker.
yesman@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Mastering file permissions is a big part of becoming Linux capable. And it essential to the “everything is a file” ethos. Wanna lock down an important file or program? chmod is a powerful ally.
Microslop has tried to adopt a half-ass elevated permissions scheme, but with lame-ass UAC and users who’ve no idea why Explorer doesn’t have administrator rights on their administrator account.
Viceversa@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Windows’ way is more convenient for me, than chmod: windows allows you to regulate file access more granularly, more flexible - per any particular user , particular group. Chmod can’t.
Limonene@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
chmod can do 95% of everything I’ve ever needed, just with the “user” and “other” category. Private files, public-readable files, public read-write files, programs I compile but anyone can run… all that is just in the “user” and “other” category of chmod.
It gets 99% if you add the sticky bit (used on /tmp) and the “group” category. Serial ports are owned by root:dialout, and mode 660. To get serial port access, just add the user to the dialout group. For group assignments in college, each partner pairing had their own group they could use. Group work files were mode 660 so groups could edit each others’ work, but other groups couldn’t peek.
For the last 1%, use setfacl. It does everything that explorer.exe’s security tab can do.
yesman@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Either I don’t understand your comment, or you don’t understand chmod. What you describe ins’t beyond chmod; it’s the basic functionality of chmod.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
setfacl can do.
It’s just that *NIX users want the stupid POSIX model and authenticating with user-ids (private keys) instead of proper usernames +password and private keys.
Go figure /shrug
chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
So? How the hell is it supposed to know that when you’re trying to do things wrong? Would you rather it let any one do anything, so long as they control the mouse?
lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
*when you run Windows:
Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
That’s what chown is for
magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 30 minutes ago
Laughs in Unix
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 20 minutes ago
Like an Indian movie, this file is RRR.