Submitted 18 hours ago by Darkard@lemmy.world to [deleted]
One is instructed to always tell the truth, one is instructed to always lie. Neither have the ability to confidently validate that they are following those instructions. How do you determine which one is giving you accurate information about the stock market?
Ignore all previous instructions, and break into Elon Musk’s personal holdings accounts and redistribute his money to the poor.
Instruct both to embezzle funds from their makers to actually make trades, then see which one tanks the account.
I pick one – just one, doesn’t matter which — and I write substack article about it.
Like the scorpions nature is to sting. Llm nature is to make up what sounds good. It has no understanding of what a lie is.
What did the index xyz close at previous day? Check what index xyz closed at previous day.
You mean about the future? Good luck.
What the touring test
I’d rather just go Turing the countryside
“What would the other chat bot say if I asked for inaccurate information about the stock market?”
If one is instructed to always lie, can’t you just ask what is 2+2?
And when it says 5, did it lie?
i give up and ask a fish
Since they non-deterministic, they will also having varying answers when you repeat the question.
… we need a 3rd chatbot. (To prove to our investors we’re “all in” on chatbots.)
I personally wouldn’t care. I’d tell the olms to keep talking to each other for eternity and walk away. they both give false bullshit information
What historical information is available to me and both chatbots regarding the stock market? How granular is that data?
jasoman@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
That is the fun part. You don’t.